Sheila Isanaka1,2,3, Stephen R Kodish4, Fatou Berthé5, Ian Alley3, Fabienne Nackers3, Kerstin E Hanson6, Rebecca F Grais2,3. 1. Departments of Nutrition and sheila.isanaka@epicentre.msf.org. 2. Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; and. 3. Epicentre and. 4. Departments of Nutrition and. 5. Epicentre Niger, and. 6. Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Paris, Paris, France.
Abstract
Background: Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective, but program coverage remains low. Treatment models that maintain high levels of clinical effectiveness but allow for increased coverage are still needed. A reduced schedule of follow-up, in which children receive clinical follow-up and therapeutic foods on a monthly rather than weekly basis, may be one alternative.Objective: We aimed to describe the safety and feasibility of a monthly distribution of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) in the treatment of uncomplicated SAM, in terms of clinical response to treatment and household RUTF use.Design: We conducted a nonrandomized pilot intervention study in which 115 children eligible for outpatient treatment of SAM were provided a monthly ration of RUTF. Anthropometric measurements were taken weekly for 4 wk to monitor treatment response. Unannounced household spot checks were conducted over 4 wk to assess household use of RUTF and storage practices. Results: Adequate weight and midupper arm circumference (MUAC) gain were found throughout the 4-wk follow-up period. Observed mean ± SD weight gain from admission was 9.8 ± 6.8 g · kg-1 · d-1 in week 1 and 4.2 ± 2.1 g · kg-1 · d-1 by week 4. Unplanned household spot checks found an average surplus of RUTF sachets compared with the number expected based on the date of distribution and recommended dosing throughout the 4 wk of follow-up. The frequency at which more than the recommended dose was used (i.e., deviance of >2 sachets between available and expected stocks) was 4% and 22% of households visited in week 1 and week 4, respectively. Conclusion: Adequate treatment response and RUTF use in the outpatient treatment of SAM was maintained over 4 wk of follow-up with a monthly schedule of RUTF distribution. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02994212.
Background: Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective, but program coverage remains low. Treatment models that maintain high levels of clinical effectiveness but allow for increased coverage are still needed. A reduced schedule of follow-up, in which children receive clinical follow-up and therapeutic foods on a monthly rather than weekly basis, may be one alternative.Objective: We aimed to describe the safety and feasibility of a monthly distribution of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) in the treatment of uncomplicated SAM, in terms of clinical response to treatment and household RUTF use.Design: We conducted a nonrandomized pilot intervention study in which 115 children eligible for outpatient treatment of SAM were provided a monthly ration of RUTF. Anthropometric measurements were taken weekly for 4 wk to monitor treatment response. Unannounced household spot checks were conducted over 4 wk to assess household use of RUTF and storage practices. Results: Adequate weight and midupper arm circumference (MUAC) gain were found throughout the 4-wk follow-up period. Observed mean ± SD weight gain from admission was 9.8 ± 6.8 g · kg-1 · d-1 in week 1 and 4.2 ± 2.1 g · kg-1 · d-1 by week 4. Unplanned household spot checks found an average surplus of RUTF sachets compared with the number expected based on the date of distribution and recommended dosing throughout the 4 wk of follow-up. The frequency at which more than the recommended dose was used (i.e., deviance of >2 sachets between available and expected stocks) was 4% and 22% of households visited in week 1 and week 4, respectively. Conclusion: Adequate treatment response and RUTF use in the outpatient treatment of SAM was maintained over 4 wk of follow-up with a monthly schedule of RUTF distribution. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02994212.
Authors: Josh M Colston; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Lawrence H Moulton; Maribel Paredes Olortegui; Peter S Kosek; Dixner Rengifo Trigoso; Mery Siguas Salas; Francesca Schiaffino; Ruthly François; Fahmina Fardus-Reid; Jonathan R Swann; Margaret N Kosek Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2019-11-15
Authors: Matt D T Hitchings; Fatou Berthé; Philip Aruna; Ibrahim Shehu; Muhammed Ali Hamza; Siméon Nanama; Chizoba Steve-Edemba; Rebecca F Grais; Sheila Isanaka Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 11.069