G F Stegmann1, L Bester1. 1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dose and route of administration on the sedative-hypnotic effects of midazolam. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study ANIMALS: Six indigenous, African bred goats. METHODS: Pilot studies indicated that the optimum dose of midazolam for producing sedation was 0.6 mg kg-1 for intramuscular (IM) injection, while the optimum intravenous (IV) doses causing hypnosis without, and with loss of palpebral reflexes were 0.6 mg kg-1 and 1.2 mg kg-1, respectively. These doses and routes of administration were compared with a saline placebo in a randomized block design in the main experiment, and the sedative-hypnotic effects evaluated according to pre-determined scales. RESULTS: Intramuscular midazolam produced sedation with or without sternal recumbency in all animals with the peak effect occurring 20 minutes after administration. The scores for IM sedation with midazolam were significantly different (p < 0.05) from placebo. Intravenous midazolam at 0.6 mg kg-1 resulted in hypnosis, and at 1.2 mg kg-1 increased reflex suppression was observed. The maximum scores for hypnosis at both doses were obtained 5 minutes after IV injection. The mean (± SD) duration of lateral recumbency was 10.8 (± 3.8) minutes after IV midazolam (0.6 mg kg-1) compared to 20 (± 5.2) minutes after midazolam at 1.2 mg kg-1. Compared to baseline, the heart rate increased significantly (p < 0.05) after high dose IV midazolam. CONCLUSION: Intramuscular midazolam (0.6 mg kg-1) produced maximum sedation 20 minutes after injection. Intravenous injection produced maximum hypnosis within 5 minutes. Increasing the IV dose from 0.6 to 1.2 mg kg-1 resulted in increased reflex suppression and duration of hypnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For a profound effect with rapid onset midazolam should be given IV in doses between 0.6 and 1.2 mg kg-1.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dose and route of administration on the sedative-hypnotic effects of midazolam. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study ANIMALS: Six indigenous, African bred goats. METHODS: Pilot studies indicated that the optimum dose of midazolam for producing sedation was 0.6 mg kg-1 for intramuscular (IM) injection, while the optimum intravenous (IV) doses causing hypnosis without, and with loss of palpebral reflexes were 0.6 mg kg-1 and 1.2 mg kg-1, respectively. These doses and routes of administration were compared with a saline placebo in a randomized block design in the main experiment, and the sedative-hypnotic effects evaluated according to pre-determined scales. RESULTS: Intramuscular midazolam produced sedation with or without sternal recumbency in all animals with the peak effect occurring 20 minutes after administration. The scores for IM sedation with midazolam were significantly different (p < 0.05) from placebo. Intravenous midazolam at 0.6 mg kg-1 resulted in hypnosis, and at 1.2 mg kg-1 increased reflex suppression was observed. The maximum scores for hypnosis at both doses were obtained 5 minutes after IV injection. The mean (± SD) duration of lateral recumbency was 10.8 (± 3.8) minutes after IV midazolam (0.6 mg kg-1) compared to 20 (± 5.2) minutes after midazolam at 1.2 mg kg-1. Compared to baseline, the heart rate increased significantly (p < 0.05) after high dose IV midazolam. CONCLUSION: Intramuscular midazolam (0.6 mg kg-1) produced maximum sedation 20 minutes after injection. Intravenous injection produced maximum hypnosis within 5 minutes. Increasing the IV dose from 0.6 to 1.2 mg kg-1 resulted in increased reflex suppression and duration of hypnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For a profound effect with rapid onset midazolam should be given IV in doses between 0.6 and 1.2 mg kg-1.
Authors: Adian Izwan; Edward P Snelling; Roger S Seymour; Leith C R Meyer; Andrea Fuller; Anna Haw; Duncan Mitchell; Anthony P Farrell; Mary-Ann Costello; Shane K Maloney Journal: J Comp Physiol B Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 2.200
Authors: Edward P Snelling; Roger S Seymour; J E F Green; Leith C R Meyer; Andrea Fuller; Anna Haw; Duncan Mitchell; Anthony P Farrell; Mary-Ann Costello; Adian Izwan; Margaret Badenhorst; Shane K Maloney Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2016-09-01
Authors: Odette O; Bradley T Simon; Lisa S Ebner; Ignacio Lizarraga; Xiaocun Sun; Sherry K Cox Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 0.897
Authors: Verónica Vieitez; Ignacio Álvarez Gómez de Segura; Víctor López Rámis; Massimo Santella; Luis Javier Ezquerra Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 2.741