Literature DB >> 2840372

Comparative study on the in vitro and in vivo activities of seven low-molecular-weight heparins.

J Fareed1, J M Walenga, D Hoppensteadt, X Huan, A Racanelli.   

Abstract

Different low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins are produced by fractionation, enzymatic and chemical methods. Although the manufacturer's assigned molecular weights of these agents are similar (around 5,000 daltons), they exhibit considerable molecular structural heterogeneity due to the variations in the manufacturing process. In vitro standardization of these LMW heparins produces highly variable results due to the variability of assay specificity. In a comparative study with seven LMW heparins, differences were found in molecular weight distribution, antifactor Xa activity, antifactor IIa activity, Heptest activity, USP potency, platelet interactions, protamine and platelet factor 4 neutralization and charge density ratios. Relative antithrombotic actions varied between the seven agents and the ratio of the intravenous:subcutaneous effects were inconsistent with expected results based on in vitro properties or observed ex vivo effects. These products were not bioequivalent in equigravimetric or equipharmacopeial dosages (antifactor Xa, USP). Although the intravenous bioavailability was proportional to the potency for an individual agent, the subcutaneous bioavailability of the same agent showed differences from that of the intravenous regimen. In addition, significant differences between the bleeding profiles of these agents were noted in both intravenous and subcutaneous routes. The bleeding profiles did not correlate well with the relative proportion of the antifactor Xa component. However, some relationship to the bleeding effect was observed with the antifactor IIa and activated-partial-thromboplastin-time activities. These LMW heparins produced different effects on platelets as studied in the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and platelet activation systems. These observations suggest that the individual composition of each LMW heparin determines its in vivo behavior which may account for the different safety/efficacy ratios observed in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2840372     DOI: 10.1159/000215861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemostasis        ISSN: 0301-0147


  9 in total

1.  Differential interactions of heparin and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans with the selectins. Implications for the use of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins as therapeutic agents.

Authors:  A Koenig; K Norgard-Sumnicht; R Linhardt; A Varki
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Heparin and enoxaparin enhance endotoxin-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in human monocytes.

Authors:  M Heinzelmann; M Miller; A Platz; L E Gordon; D O Herzig; H C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Inhibition of coagulation and platelet adhesion to extracellular matrix by unfractionated heparin and a low molecular weight heparin.

Authors:  K Krupinski; M Basic-Micic; E Lindhoff; H K Breddin
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1990-11

4.  Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, inhibits platelet-dependent prothrombinase assembly and activity by factor-Xa neutralization.

Authors:  F A Spencer; S P Ball; Q Zhang; L Liu; S Benoit; R C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Low molecular weight heparins. An objective overview.

Authors:  D Hoppensteadt; J M Walenga; J Fareed
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Parnaparin. A review of its pharmacology, and clinical application in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and other vascular disorders.

Authors:  J E Frampton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Rational design of low-molecular weight heparins with improved in vivo activity.

Authors:  Mallik Sundaram; Yiwei Qi; Zachary Shriver; Dongfang Liu; Ganlin Zhao; Ganesh Venkataraman; Robert Langer; Ram Sasisekharan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of enoxaparin : implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jawed Fareed; Debra Hoppensteadt; Jeanine Walenga; Omer Iqbal; Qing Ma; Walter Jeske; Taqdees Sheikh
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model to Predict the Effects of Commonly Used Anticoagulants on the Human Coagulation Network.

Authors:  S Hartmann; K Biliouris; L J Lesko; U Nowak-Göttl; M N Trame
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.