Literature DB >> 28403414

A national survey of videolaryngoscopy in the United Kingdom.

T M Cook, F E Kelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: There are increasing numbers of videolaryngoscopes marketed and increasing interest in the technology. The Difficult Airway Society's 2015 guidelines recommend that videolaryngoscopes should be immediately available at all times and that all anaesthetists should be trained and skilled in their use. METHODS.: An electronic survey was sent to all UK National Health Service hospitals to examine availability, use, and attitudes to videolaryngoscopy, and closed in January 2014. RESULTS.: The return rate was 67%. Videolaryngoscopy was available in 91% of operating theatres, ∼50% of intensive care units (ICUs) and obstetric theatres, with lower availability in emergency departments (EDs), paediatric anaesthesia, and independent sector hospitals. The most widely available devices were the Airtraq, the GlideScope, and C-MAC. Approximately one in seven respondents reported availability of videolaryngoscopy in all clinical areas. Most departments imposed restrictions on videolaryngoscopy use, especially the ICU and ED. Device selection was only infrequently based on published literature or formal trial. Structured introduction of videolaryngoscopy into practice was uncommon. Penetration of videolaryngoscopy was highly variable; fewer than a third reported widespread use or enthusiasm, although this increased where the C-MAC and GlideScope were widely available. CONCLUSIONS.: Videolaryngoscopy is available in most hospitals' main operating departments, but in fewer than half of other locations. There is marked variation in device, methods of introduction, usage, and clinical adoption. Most hospitals need to change practice to comply with current guidelines. Selection and implementation vary widely.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway; anaesthesia; equipment; training; videolaryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28403414     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Managing the difficult airway: A survey of doctors with different seniority in China.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Liu; Yong Wang; Ming Zhong; Yu-Hui Li; Huan Gao; Jian-Feng Zhang; Wu-Hua Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Howle; Desire Onwochei; Siew-Ling Harrison; Neel Desai
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 3.  Airway Leads and Airway Response Teams: Improving Delivery of Safer Airway Management?

Authors:  Carolyn Smith; Alistair F McNarry
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  A national survey of videolaryngoscopes and alternative intubation devices in Hungary.

Authors:  Bálint Nagy; Szilárd Rendeki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Airway management equipment and practice: time to optimise institutional, team, and personal preparedness.

Authors:  Matthew Gibbins; Fiona E Kelly; Tim M Cook
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate condition: a randomised crossover simulation research study of the interaction between two algorithms.

Authors:  Thomas Ott; Jascha Stracke; Susanna Sellin; Marc Kriege; Gerrit Toenges; Carsten Lott; Sebastian Kuhn; Kristin Engelhard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Role of videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult airway in adults: A survey.

Authors:  A H Shruthi; Deevish Dinakara; Y R Chandrika
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 8.  Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go?

Authors:  Pascale Avery; Sarah Morton; James Raitt; Hans Morten Lossius; David Lockey
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  The golden era of videolaryngoscopy: costs we should consider.

Authors:  Geun Joo Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-26

10.  Nationwide survey on training and device utilization during tracheal intubation in French intensive care units.

Authors:  M Martin; P Decamps; A Seguin; C Garret; L Crosby; O Zambon; A F Miailhe; E Canet; J Reignier; J B Lascarrou
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.