Tianne Numan1, Arjen J C Slooter2, Arendina W van der Kooi2, Annemieke M L Hoekman2, Willem J L Suyker3, Cornelis J Stam4, Edwin van Dellen5. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: t.numan-2@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight in the underlying mechanism of reduced levels of consciousness due to hypoactive delirium versus recovery from anesthesia, we studied functional connectivity and network topology using electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: EEG recordings were performed in age and sex-matched patients with hypoactive delirium (n=18), patients recovering from anesthesia (n=20), and non-delirious control patients (n=20), all after cardiac surgery. Functional and directed connectivity were studied with phase lag index and directed phase transfer entropy. Network topology was characterized using the minimum spanning tree (MST). A random forest classifier was calculated based on all measures to obtain discriminative ability between the three groups. RESULTS: Non-delirious control subjects showed a back-to-front information flow, which was lost during hypoactive delirium (p=0.01) and recovery from anesthesia (p<0.01). The recovery from anesthesia group had more integrated network in the delta band compared to non-delirious controls. In contrast, hypoactive delirium showed a less integrated network in the alpha band. High accuracy for discrimination between hypoactive delirious patients and controls (86%) and recovery from anesthesia and controls (95%) were found. Accuracy for discrimination between hypoactive delirium and recovery from anesthesia was 73%. CONCLUSION: Loss of functional and directed connectivity were observed in both hypoactive delirium and recovery from anesthesia, which might be related to the reduced level of consciousness in both states. These states could be distinguished in topology, which was a less integrated network during hypoactive delirium. SIGNIFICANCE: Functional and directed connectivity are similarly disturbed during a reduced level of consciousness due to hypoactive delirium and sedatives, however topology was differently affected.
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight in the underlying mechanism of reduced levels of consciousness due to hypoactive delirium versus recovery from anesthesia, we studied functional connectivity and network topology using electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: EEG recordings were performed in age and sex-matched patients with hypoactive delirium (n=18), patients recovering from anesthesia (n=20), and non-delirious control patients (n=20), all after cardiac surgery. Functional and directed connectivity were studied with phase lag index and directed phase transfer entropy. Network topology was characterized using the minimum spanning tree (MST). A random forest classifier was calculated based on all measures to obtain discriminative ability between the three groups. RESULTS:Non-delirious control subjects showed a back-to-front information flow, which was lost during hypoactive delirium (p=0.01) and recovery from anesthesia (p<0.01). The recovery from anesthesia group had more integrated network in the delta band compared to non-delirious controls. In contrast, hypoactive delirium showed a less integrated network in the alpha band. High accuracy for discrimination between hypoactive deliriouspatients and controls (86%) and recovery from anesthesia and controls (95%) were found. Accuracy for discrimination between hypoactive delirium and recovery from anesthesia was 73%. CONCLUSION: Loss of functional and directed connectivity were observed in both hypoactive delirium and recovery from anesthesia, which might be related to the reduced level of consciousness in both states. These states could be distinguished in topology, which was a less integrated network during hypoactive delirium. SIGNIFICANCE: Functional and directed connectivity are similarly disturbed during a reduced level of consciousness due to hypoactive delirium and sedatives, however topology was differently affected.
Authors: Elizabeth Mahanna-Gabrielli; Katie J Schenning; Lars I Eriksson; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Clinton B Wright; Deborah J Culley; Lis Evered; David A Scott; Nae Yah Wang; Charles H Brown; Esther Oh; Patrick Purdon; Sharon Inouye; Miles Berger; Robert A Whittington; Catherine C Price; Stacie Deiner Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Ziyad W Sultan; Elizabeth R Jaeckel; Bryan M Krause; Sean M Grady; Caitlin A Murphy; Robert D Sanders; Matthew I Banks Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Jo Ellen Wilson; Matthew F Mart; Colm Cunningham; Yahya Shehabi; Timothy D Girard; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Arjen J C Slooter; E Wesley Ely Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Robert Fleischmann; Steffi Traenkner; Antje Kraft; Sein Schmidt; Stephan J Schreiber; Stephan A Brandt Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-01-07
Authors: S J T van Montfort; E van Dellen; C J Stam; A H Ahmad; L J Mentink; C W Kraan; A Zalesky; A J C Slooter Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Simone J T van Montfort; Edwin van Dellen; Aletta M R van den Bosch; Willem M Otte; Maya J L Schutte; Soo-Hee Choi; Tae-Sub Chung; Sunghyon Kyeong; Arjen J C Slooter; Jae-Jin Kim Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: S J T van Montfort; A J C Slooter; I M J Kant; R R van der Leur; C Spies; J de Bresser; T D Witkamp; J Hendrikse; E van Dellen Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.881