Literature DB >> 28402521

Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

Nilüfer Irem Tunçer1, Ayça Arman-Özçirpici1, Bahar Füsun Oduncuoglu2, Jülide Sedef Göçmen3, Alpdogan Kantarci4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Piezoelectric surgery is a newly introduced technique for rapid tooth movement. However, the efficiency of this technique has not been investigated on en-masse retraction cases yet.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of piezosurgery technique in accelerating miniscrew supported en-masse retraction and study the biological tissue response. In addition, to show if this technique induces a difference in dental, skeletal and soft tissue changes on lateral cephalograms, and in canine and molar rotations, besides intercanine and intermolar widths on dental casts. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a randomized, single-centred, parallel-group, controlled trial, requiring upper right and left first premolar extractions on 30 patients above the minimum age of 14 years at the beginning of retraction.
INTERVENTIONS: Piezosurgery-assisted versus conventional en-masse retraction anchored from miniscrews placed between second premolars and first molars, bilaterally. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was the en-masse retraction rate. Secondary outcomes were gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume and GCF content of receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (RANKL), changes regarding cephalometric and dental cast variables, and miniscrew success rates. RANDOMIZATION: Accomplished with opaque, sealed envelopes. BLINDING: Applicable for data assessment only. RECRUITMENT: Commenced in February 2013 and ended in October 2014.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the study and divided into 2 groups of piezosurgery (n = 16) and control (n = 15). After 9.3 months of follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups for neither retraction rates (P = 0.958) nor GCF parameters (P > 0.05). Changes in lateral cephalometric and dental cast variables, and miniscrew success rates did not show significant differences either.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, piezosurgery technique was found to be ineffective in accelerating en-masse retraction, and promoting a difference in the studied GCF parameters, skeletal and dental variables. REGISTRATION: The trial was not registered. PROTOCOL: The full protocol of this PhD thesis study can be accessed from tez.yok.gov.tr. FUNDING: This work was supported by Başkent University Research Fund. No conflict of interest was declared.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28402521     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Is Piezocision effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samer Mheissen; Haris Khan; Shadi Samawi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Efficacy and safety of piezocision in accelerating maxillary anterior teeth en-masse retraction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yichen Xu; Liming Yu; Xianqin Tong; Yuhui Wang; Yuanyuan Li; Jie Pan; Yanjing Yang; Yuehua Liu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 3.  A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Daniel Jaramillo-Bedoya; Gustavo Villegas-Giraldo; Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Diana Milena Ramírez-Ossa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Effect of piezocision on molar intrusion in open-bite treatment using a modified MEAW technique.

Authors:  Hanife Nuray Yilmaz; Evin Alakus; Buket Erdem; Nazan Kucukkeles
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction.

Authors:  Abdulkarim A Hatrom; Khalid H Zawawi; Reem M Al-Ali; Hanadi M Sabban; Talal M Zahid; Ghassan A Al-Turki; Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Effects of piezocision in orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review of comparative studies.

Authors:  Daniel-Santos-Fonseca Figueiredo; Ricardo-Gontijo Houara; Larissa-Salgado-da Mata-Cid Pinto; Amanda-Rafaela Diniz; Vânia-Eloisa de Araújo; Lehana Thabane; Rodrigo-Villamarim Soares; Dauro-Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-11-01

7.  Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hanin Nizar Khlef; Mohammad Younis Hajeer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Effect of piezocision procedure in levelling and alignment stage of fixed orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharmin Sultana; Norma Ab Rahman; Siti Lailatul Akmar Zainuddin; Basaruddin Ahmad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Khaled Wafaie; Mumen Z Rizk; Mohammed Almuzian; Rami Sosly; David R Bearn
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Comparison of piezocision and discision methods in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Mustafa Cihan Yavuz; Oguzhan Sunar; Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk; Alpdogan Kantarcı
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.