Literature DB >> 28402500

Evaluation of the AID carbapenemase line probe assay for rapid detection and identification of carbapenemase genes in Gram-negative bacilli.

Guido V Bloemberg1, Andrea Braun-Kiewnick1, Jan Tedrup1, Carla Meijerink1, Elena Durer1, Claudia Ritter1, Peter M Keller1, Michael Hombach1.   

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the AID carbapenemase line probe assay (LPA) for the detection and identification of carbapenem resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) using bacterial cultures and DNA extracts directly from patient urine samples.
Methods: The AID carbapenemase LPA detects 13 different carbapenemase genes. Test probe accuracy was verified for using clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates harbouring bla KPC , bla VIM , bla NDM , bla GIM , bla AIM , bla SPM , bla IMP and bla OXA-48 and a well-characterized set of Escherichia coli DH5α strains transformed with the vector plasmid pUC57- kan harbouring bla BIC , bla SIM , bla DIM , bla IMI-3 , bla IMI-1 and bla NMC-A . Sensitivity and specificity was determined by testing 151 clinical GNB strains previously characterized for the production of carbapenemase activity and carbapenemase genes. Direct detection of carbapenemase genes using the LPA was determined using 299 clinical urine specimens. Analytical sensitivity for detection in urine was determined by testing serial dilutions of bla KPC and bla NDM in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.
Results: All carbapenemase gene probes showed 100% accuracy without cross-reactions. Sensitivity and specificity of the LPA using clinical isolates was 100% for each. Analytical sensitivity for detection of bla KPC and bla NDM in urine was 10 1 -10 2 cfu. The LPA detected carbapenemase genes in 20 urines, which were confirmed in 12 samples by conventional multiplex PCR. Remarkably, 0 of the 20 urines grew carbapenemase-suspicious GNB applying EUCAST recommendations. Conclusions: The AID carbapenemase LPA is an accurate, sensitive and easy-to-use test for the detection and identification of carbapenemase genes, which can readily be implemented in any diagnostic laboratory.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28402500     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Global Ascendency of OXA-48-Type Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Johann D D Pitout; Gisele Peirano; Marleen M Kock; Kathy-Anne Strydom; Yasufumi Matsumura
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yu Feng; Guangmin Tang; Fu Qiao; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Comparison of two commercial carbapenemase gene confirmatory assays in multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii-complex.

Authors:  Stephan Rösner; Kevin Gehlweiler; Uta Küsters; Mathias Kolbert; Kirsten Hübner; Niels Pfennigwerth; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of a lateral flow immunoassay to detect CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) directly from positive blood cultures for its potential use in Antimicrobial Stewardship programs.

Authors:  E Cendejas-Bueno; M P Romero-Gómez; I Falces-Romero; A Aranda-Diaz; D García-Ballesteros; J Mingorance; J García-Rodríguez
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.515

Review 5.  Identification and Antibiotic-Susceptibility Profiling of Infectious Bacterial Agents: A Review of Current and Future Trends.

Authors:  Gaetano Maugeri; Iana Lychko; Rita Sobral; Ana C A Roque
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The effect of varying multidrug-resistence (MDR) definitions on rates of MDR gram-negative rods.

Authors:  Aline Wolfensberger; Stefan P Kuster; Martina Marchesi; Reinhard Zbinden; Michael Hombach
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.887

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.