| Literature DB >> 28402443 |
Fang Chen1, Mingqiang Shen1, Dongfeng Zeng1,2, Cheng Wang1, Song Wang1, Shilei Chen1, Yong Tang1, Mengjia Hu1, Mo Chen1, Yongping Su1, Xinze Ran1, Yang Xu1, Junping Wang1.
Abstract
Thrombocytopenia is an important cause of hemorrhage and death after radiation injury, but the pathogenesis of radiation-induced thrombocytopenia has not been fully characterized. Here, we investigated the influence of radiation-induced endothelial cell injury on platelet regeneration. We found that human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) underwent a high rate of apoptosis, accompanied by a significant reduction in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at 96 h after radiation. Subsequent investigations revealed that radiation injury lowered the ability of HUVECs to attract migrating megakaryocytes (MKs). Moreover, the adhesion of MKs to HUVECs was markedly reduced when HUVECs were exposed to radiation, accompanied by a decreased production of platelets by MKs. In vivo study showed that VEGF treatment significantly promoted the migration of MKs into the vascular niche and accelerated platelet recovery in irradiated mice. Our studies demonstrate that endothelial cell injury contributes to the slow recovery of platelets after radiation, which provides a deeper insight into the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia induced by radiation.Entities:
Keywords: VEGF; endothelial cell; megakaryocyte; platelet; radiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28402443 PMCID: PMC5570070 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiat Res ISSN: 0449-3060 Impact factor: 2.724
Fig. 1.Radiation induced the morphologic alteration and apoptosis in HUVECs. HUVEC monolayers were exposed to 5 Gy radiation and incubated at 37°C for 96 h. (A) Changes in HUVEC morphology were detected by phase contrast imaging. (B) HUVEC morphology alterations were observed with SEM. (C) Apoptosis in irradiated HUVECs was analyzed by the Annexin V, FITC kit. (D) Histogram showing the mean apoptosis rate for each group. **P < 0.01 vs HUVEC.
Fig. 2.Decreased expression and secretion of VEGF in HUVECs after radiation. HUVEC monolayers were irradiated with 5 Gy radiation and incubated at 37°C for 96 h. (A) The mRNA levels of VEGF were analyzed by qRT-PCR. **P < 0.01 vs HUVEC. (B) VEGF secretion was quantified by ELISA at 96 h after 5 Gy radiation. *P < 0.05 vs HUVEC. (C) The expression of VEGF in HUVEC lysates were determined by western blot, and anti-GAPDH was used as an internal standard. (D) Relative protein expression for each group was analyzed by Image J software. **P < 0.01 vs HUVEC.
Fig. 3.Radiation-induced HUVEC injury weakened the adhesion, migration, and platelet production of MKs. (A) The adhesion of MKs was photographed by phase contrast imaging. (B) The mean fluorescence intensity of adherent MKs was examined using an M2 microplate reader. **P < 0.01 vs MKs + HUVEC. (C) MKs that migrated through transwell were stained with crystal violet and examined under a microscope. (D) The average number of migrated cells from four random fields were counted for each group. **P < 0.01 MKs vs MKs + HUVEC, **P < 0.01 MKs+HUVEC vs MKs + HUVEC-5 Gy, **P < 0.01 MKs+HUVEC-5 Gy vs MKs + HUVEC-5 Gy + VEGF. (E) CD34+ cells were cultured for 13 days and co-cultured with irradiated HUVEC monolayers. The platelets were stained with APC-CD42b, FITC-CD41 and PI and were detected by flow cytometer. (F) The expression of platelets derived from MKs in each group. **P < 0.01 MKs vs MKs + HUVEC, **P < 0.01 MKs vs MKs + HUVEC, **P < 0.01 MKs + HUVEC vs MKs + HUVEC-5 Gy, **P < 0.01 MKs + HUVEC-5 Gy vs MKs + HUVEC-5 Gy + VEGF.
Fig. 4.VEGF administration enhanced platelet recovery in mice with thrombocytopenia. (A) Groups of 10 male BALB/c mice were injected intravenously with VEGF at Day 4 post–5 Gy TBI for 7 successive days. (B) Changes in the platelets counts in tail vein blood of mice in each group. **P < 0.01 vs Control, *P < 0.05 vs Control. (C) H&E stain of bone marrow in the mice. MK: megakaryocyte S: vascular sinusoid. (D) A quantification of the distance between MKs and vascular sinus of different groups was compared. **P < 0.01 vs Control.