Literature DB >> 28401612

Codiversification of gastrointestinal microbiota and phylogeny in passerines is not explained by ecological divergence.

Lucie Kropáčková1, Martin Těšický1, Tomáš Albrecht1,2, Jan Kubovčiak1, Dagmar Čížková2, Oldřich Tomášek1,2, Jean-François Martin3, Lukáš Bobek2, Tereza Králová2, Petr Procházka2, Jakub Kreisinger1.   

Abstract

Vertebrate gut microbiota (GM) is comprised of a taxonomically diverse consortium of symbiotic and commensal microorganisms that have a pronounced effect on host physiology, immune system function and health status. Despite much research on interactions between hosts and their GM, the factors affecting inter- and intraspecific GM variation in wild populations are still poorly known. We analysed data on faecal microbiota composition in 51 passerine species (319 individuals) using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA (V3-V4 variable region). Despite pronounced interindividual variation, GM composition exhibited significant differences at the interspecific level, accounting for approximately 20%-30% of total GM variation. We also observed a significant correlation between GM composition divergence and host's phylogenetic divergence, with strength of correlation higher than that of GM vs. ecological or life history traits and geographic variation. The effect of host's phylogeny on GM composition was significant, even after statistical control for these confounding factors. Hence, our data do not support codiversification of GM and passerine phylogeny solely as a by-product of their ecological divergence. Furthermore, our findings do not support that GM vs. host's phylogeny codiversification is driven primarily through trans-generational GM transfer as the GM vs. phylogeny correlation does not increase with higher sequence similarity used when delimiting operational taxonomic units. Instead, we hypothesize that the GM vs. phylogeny correlation may arise as a consequence of interspecific divergence of genes that directly or indirectly modulate composition of GM.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  birds; cophylogeny; metagenomics; microbiome; neutral/adaptive evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401612     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  30 in total

Review 1.  Primate microbiomes over time: Longitudinal answers to standing questions in microbiome research.

Authors:  Johannes R Björk; Mauna Dasari; Laura Grieneisen; Elizabeth A Archie
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  A bird's-eye view of phylosymbiosis: weak signatures of phylosymbiosis among all 15 species of cranes.

Authors:  Brian K Trevelline; Jahree Sosa; Barry K Hartup; Kevin D Kohl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  An introduction to phylosymbiosis.

Authors:  Shen Jean Lim; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Investigation on the characteristics of gut microbiota in critically endangered blue-crowned laughingthrush (Garrulax courtoisi).

Authors:  Cong Wang; Jiawei Li; Yuwei Cheng; Hongbo Tang; Yanpeng Xiong; Yongfei Wu; Luping Wang; Daoqiang Liu; Jianhua Huang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Species-specific but not phylosymbiotic gut microbiomes of New Guinean passerine birds are shaped by diet and flight-associated gut modifications.

Authors:  Kasun H Bodawatta; Bonny Koane; Gibson Maiah; Katerina Sam; Michael Poulsen; Knud A Jønsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Variation between the oral and faecal microbiota in a free-living passerine bird, the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Lucie Kropáčková; Hana Pechmanová; Michal Vinkler; Jana Svobodová; Hana Velová; Martin Těšičký; Jean-François Martin; Jakub Kreisinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of gizzard and intestinal microbiota of wild neotropical birds.

Authors:  M Alexandra García-Amado; Hakdong Shin; Virginia Sanz; Miguel Lentino; L Margarita Martínez; Monica Contreras; Fabian Michelangeli; María Gloria Domínguez-Bello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interspecific comparison of the fecal microbiota structure in three Arctic migratory bird species.

Authors:  Hyunjun Cho; Won Young Lee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multi-level comparisons of cloacal, skin, feather and nest-associated microbiota suggest considerable influence of horizontal acquisition on the microbiota assembly of sympatric woodlarks and skylarks.

Authors:  H Pieter J van Veelen; Joana Falcao Salles; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Oral and vaginal microbiota in selected field mice of the genus Apodemus: a wild population study.

Authors:  Jakub Kreisinger; Pavel Stopka; Tereza Matějková; Petra Hájková; Romana Stopková; Michal Stanko; Jean-François Martin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.