| Literature DB >> 28401459 |
Bhuban Mohan Panda1,2, Urmil J Mehta3, Sulekha Hazra3.
Abstract
Semecarpus anacardium L. is a tree species which produces secondary metabolites of medicinal importance. Roots of the plant have been traditionally used in folk medicines. Different strains of Agrobacterium rhizogenes (A4, ATCC15834 and LBA 9402) were used for induction of hairy roots in in vitro grown tissues of the plant. Hairy root initiation was observed after 25-30 days of infection. Optimum transformation frequency of 61% was achieved on leaf explants with ATCC15834 strain. Infection time of 30 min resulted in greater transformation frequency compared to 10 and 20 min, respectively. The hairy roots cultured in growth regulator-free semi-solid woody plant medium differentiated into callus. Whole shoots infected with ATCC 15834 were found to produce more transformants upon co-cultivation for 4 (65%) and 5 (67%) days. Induction of hairy roots in stem explants infected with ATCC 15834 was lower (52%) compared to leaves (62%) after 4 days of co-cultivation. In A4 and LBA9402 strains transformation efficiency was 49 ± 2.8% and 36 ± 5.7% in shoots after 4 days of co-cultivation. Transformation frequency was higher in ATCC15834 strain, irrespective of explants. The hairy roots of S. anacardium elongated slowly upon transfer to half-strength liquid medium. After 3-4 passages in liquid medium slender hairy roots started differentiating which were separated from the original explants. Visible growth of the roots was observed in hormone-free liquid medium after 2-3 months of culturing. Polymerase chain reaction with gene-specific primers from rol A, B and C genes confirms the positive transformation events.Entities:
Keywords: Hairy root culture; In vitro culture; Semecarpus anacardium; Transformation; rol genes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28401459 PMCID: PMC5388658 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-0608-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Effect of infection time on transformation frequency (%) of A. rhizogenes ATCC15834 with leaves as explants
| Days of co-cultivation | Transformation frequency (%) (mean ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time duration of infection | |||
| 10 min | 20 min | 30 min | |
| 1 | 00 ± 00 (135) | 00 (115) | 00 ± 00 (130) |
| 2 | 00 ± 00 (125) | 23 ± 1.4 (106) | 35 ± 2.12 (140) |
| 3 | 00 ± 00 (98) | 28 ± 4.12 (106) | 49 ± 3.5 (128) |
| 4 | 7 ± 00 (122) | 39 ± 2.5 (123) | 61 ± 2.8 (110) |
| 5 | 00 ± 00 (140) | 25 ± 2.8 (90) | 53 ± 2.12 (95) |
| 6 | 00 ± 00 (102) | 15 ± 2.12 (145) | 42 ± 4.2 (145) |
| 7 | 00 ± 00 (110) | 7 ± 1.4 (120) | 29 ± 2.12 (116) |
| ANOVA | – | Sig 1% | Sig 1% |
Figures in parenthesis () indicates number of replicates
Fig. 1Induction of hairy roots in different explants. a Control leaf explants in half-strength WPM medium without any root development after 8 weeks of culturing in antibiotic-incorporated medium. b Induction of root in leaves infected with A. rhizogenes after 3–4 weeks of culturing in half-strength WPM medium containing antibiotics. c Initiation of hairy root-like structure originating from the mid rib region of leaf explants in half-strength WPM medium containing antibiotics. d Cluster of roots with fine root hairs arising from the leaf explants in half-strength WPM medium containing antibiotic; the base of the roots are associated with callus. e Thin slender roots with root hairs developed from the clusters of roots on culturing in GR-free half-strength WPM medium. f Cluster of hairy roots showing growth and elongation from leaf explants infected with A. rhizogenes cultured in half-strength WPM medium. g Initiation and growth of hairy roots from stem explants cultured in half-strength WPM medium. h Hairy roots in stem explants originate mostly from leaves attached to shoot explants infected with A. rhizogenes in half-strength WPM medium. i Emergence of hairy roots from the mid rib region of leaf explants attached to shoot
Effects of co-cultivation duration and bacterial strains on transformation frequency (%) of different explants
| Bacterial strains | Transformation frequency (%) (mean ± SD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days of co-cultivation | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Leaf explants | |||||||
| Control | 00 ± 00 (96) | 00 ± 00 (112) | 00 ± 00 (110) | 00 ± 00 (133) | 00 ± 00 (123) | 00 ± 00 (98) | 00 ± 00 (129) |
| A4 | 00 ± 00 (98) | 32.5 ± 11 (120) | 47 ± 8.9 (123) | 58.5 ± 5 (128) | 46.5 ± 9 (112) | 30 ± 4.24 (120) | 27 ± 4.3 (142) |
| ATCC15834 | 00 ± 00 (96) | 30 ± 4 (116) | 51.5 ± 2.2 (148) | 61.5 ± 2 (132) | 53 ± 2 (134) | 40 ± 2.82 (143) | 28 ± 2.8 (114) |
| LBA9402 | 00 ± 00 (98) | 31 ± 11 (125) | 41.5 ± 11 (120) | 41.5 ± 12 (147) | 35.5 ± 4 (125) | 31 ± 9.19 (150) | 23 ± 9.89 (114) |
| ANOVA | NS | Sig 5% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | |
| Stem explants | |||||||
| Control | 00 ± 00 (96) | 00 ± 00 (106) | 00 ± 00 (112) | 00 ± 00 (132) | 00 ± 00 (95) | 00 ± 00 (96) | 00 ± 00 (124) |
| A4 | 00 ± 00 (90) | 31 ± 18 (103) | 32.5 ± 11 (113) | 45 ± 7 (134) | 52 ± 3 (96) | 40 ± 3 (95) | 39 ± 1.4 (123) |
| ATCC15834 | 00 ± 00 (93) | 35 ± 3 (123) | 43.5 ± 4 (120) | 52 ± 3 (122) | 60 ± 9 (103) | 44 ± 3 (116) | 37 ± 5.6 (143) |
| LBA9402 | 00 ± 00 (92) | 32 ± 10 (121) | 29.5 ± 12 (94) | 39 ± 2 (110) | 42 ± 1 (107) | 35 ± 4 (112) | 29 ± 8.4 (134) |
| ANOVA | NS | Sig 5% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | |
| Shoot explants | |||||||
| Control | 00 ± 00 (112) | 00 ± 00 (116) | 00 ± 00 (128) | 00 ± 00 (134) | 00 ± 00 (102) | 00 ± 00 (122) | 00 ± 00 (136) |
| A4 | 00 ± 00 (122) | 20 ± 10 (110) | 37 ± 28.8 (135) | 49 ± 3 (121) | 39 ± 11 (112) | 41 ± 17 (127) | 44 ± 3.6 (98) |
| ATCC15834 | 00 ± 00 (124) | 32 ± 3 (123) | 43 ± 15.3 (138) | 65 ± 10 (118) | 67 ± 3 (134) | 63 ± 12 (146) | 58 ± 8 (95) |
| LBA9402 | 00 ± 00 (113) | 17 ± 8 (116) | 27 ± 15.3 (121) | 36 ± 5.7 (118) | 33 ± 7.6 (126) | 32 ± 8 (133) | 27 ± 12 (104) |
| ANOVA | – | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 1% | Sig 5% |
Figure in parenthesis () indicates number of replicates
Fig. 2Comparison of hairy root induction in different explants, callusing of hairy roots in solid medium and hairy root culture in liquid medium. a Comparison of different A. rhizogenes strain and explant type after 4 days of co-cultivation periods on transformation frequency of S. anacardium. b, c Hairy roots dedifferentiated into callus during culturing after limited growth in semi-solid half-strength WPM medium. d Hairy root culture in liquid medium, the original leaf explant was still attached, with dedifferentiation of the roots into callus. e Clump of hairy roots cultured in liquid medium, the medium become brown due to leaching of phenolics compound
Fig. 3Confirmation of transformation by PCR. a PCR amplification of 280 bp fragment of the rolA gene. Lane 1 molecular weight marker (100 bp ladder); lane 2 DNA from non-transformed roots (negative control); lane 3 A. rhizogenes plasmid DNA (positive control); lane 4 sample 1; lane 5 sample 2; lane 6 sample 3; lane 7 sample 4. Samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 were DNA of transformed roots obtained after A. rhizogenes infection. b PCR amplification of 590 bp fragment of the rolC gene. Lane 1 molecular weight marker (100 bp ladder); lane 2 DNA from non-transformed roots (negative control); lane 3 A. rhizogenes plasmid DNA (positive control); lane 4 sample 1; lane 5 sample 2; lane 6 sample 3; lane 7 sample 4. Samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 were DNA of transformed roots obtained after A. rhizogenes infection. c PCR amplification of 780 bp fragment of the rolB gene. Lane 1 molecular weight marker (100 bp ladder); lane 2 DNA from non-transformed roots (negative control); lane 3 A. rhizogenes plasmid DNA (positive control); lane 4 sample 1; lane 5 sample 2; lane 6 sample 3; lane 7 sample 4. Samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 were DNA of transformed roots obtained after A. rhizogenes infection