Literature DB >> 28401392

Phytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles on radish plant (Raphanus sativus).

Xin Gui1,2, Mengmeng Rui1,3, Youhong Song4, Yuhui Ma, Yukui Rui5, Peng Zhang6, Xiao He6, Yuanyuan Li6, Zhiyong Zhang6, Liming Liu1.   

Abstract

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) have been considered as one type of emerging contaminants that pose great potential risks to the environment and human health. The effect of CeO2 NPs on plant-edible parts and health evaluation remains is necessary and urgently to be developed. In this study, we cultivated radish in Sigma CeO2 NP (<25 nm)-amended soils across a series of concentration treatments, i.e., 0 mg/kg as the control and 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg CeO2 NPs. The results showed that CeO2 NPs accelerated the fresh biomass accumulation of radish plant; especially in the treatment of 50 mg/kg CeO2 NPs, root expansion was increased by 2.2 times as much as the control. In addition, the relative chlorophyll content enhanced by 12.5, 12.9, and 12.2% was compared to control on 40 cultivation days. CeO2 NPs were mainly absorbed by the root and improved the activity of antioxidant enzyme system to scavenge the damage of free radicals in radish root and leaf. In addition, this study also indicated that the nanoparticles might enter the food chain through the soil into the edible part of the plant, which will be a potential threat to human health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CeO2; Nanoparticles; Radish; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401392     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8880-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Predicting contamination by the fuel additive cerium oxide engineered nanoparticles within the United Kingdom and the associated risks.

Authors:  Andrew C Johnson; Barry Park
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Dissolved cerium contributes to uptake of Ce in the presence of differently sized CeO2-nanoparticles by three crop plants.

Authors:  Franziska Schwabe; Simon Tanner; Rainer Schulin; Aline Rotzetter; Wendelin Stark; Albrecht von Quadt; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.526

3.  Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on rice: a study involving the antioxidant defense system and in vivo fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Cyren M Rico; Jie Hong; Maria Isabel Morales; Lijuan Zhao; Ana Cecilia Barrios; Jian-Ying Zhang; Jose R Peralta-Videa; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Bt-transgenic cotton is more sensitive to CeO₂ nanoparticles than its parental non-transgenic cotton.

Authors:  Xuguang Li; Xin Gui; Yukui Rui; Weikang Ji; Le Van Nhan; Zihan Yu; Shengnan Peng
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Subcellular localization of copper in tolerant and non-tolerant plant.

Authors:  Cai-Ying Ni; Ying-Xv Chen; Qi Lin; Guang-Ming Tian
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Solubility and batch retention of CeO2 nanoparticles in soils.

Authors:  Geert Cornelis; Brooke Ryan; Mike J McLaughlin; Jason K Kirby; Douglas Beak; David Chittleborough
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Transformation of ceria nanoparticles in cucumber plants is influenced by phosphate.

Authors:  Yukui Rui; Peng Zhang; Yanbei Zhang; Yuhui Ma; Xiao He; Xin Gui; Yuanyuan Li; Jing Zhang; Lirong Zheng; Shengqi Chu; Zhi Guo; Zhifang Chai; Yuliang Zhao; Zhiyong Zhang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Non-UV-induced radical reactions at the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles that may trigger toxic responses.

Authors:  Ivana Fenoglio; Giovanna Greco; Stefano Livraghi; Bice Fubini
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  The impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its implications for food safety.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Xingmao Ma; Wen Zhang; Haochun Pei; Yongsheng Chen
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.526

10.  Cerium oxide nanoparticles modify the antioxidative stress enzyme activities and macromolecule composition in rice seedlings.

Authors:  Cyren M Rico; Maria I Morales; Ricardo McCreary; Hiram Castillo-Michel; Ana C Barrios; Jie Hong; Alejandro Tafoya; Wen-Yee Lee; Armando Varela-Ramirez; Jose R Peralta-Videa; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of tolerance of tubers Solanum tuberosum to silicа nanoparticles.

Authors:  Alexandr Alekseevich Mushinskiy; Evgeniya Vladimirovna Aminovа; Anastasia Mikhailovna Korotkova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Magnesium oxide nanoparticles and thidiazuron enhance lead phytoaccumulation and antioxidative response in Raphanus sativus L.

Authors:  Fazal Hussain; Fazal Hadi; Fazal Akbar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Bioinoculation using indigenous Bacillus spp. improves growth and yield of Zea mays under the influence of nanozeolite.

Authors:  Parul Chaudhary; Priyanka Khati; Anuj Chaudhary; Saurabh Gangola; Rajeew Kumar; Anita Sharma
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Current and future perspectives on the use of nanofertilizers for sustainable agriculture: the case of phosphorus nanofertilizer.

Authors:  Nagaraj Basavegowda; Kwang-Hyun Baek
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.893

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.