Lauren C Ng1,2, Belkys López3, Matthew Pritchard4, David Deng5. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Boston University, 720 Harrison Avenue, Suite 915, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. 3. Independent Consultant, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 5. South Sudan Law Society, Juba, South Sudan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: South Sudan is embroiled in a conflict that erupted in December 2013. This study examines what people in South Sudan think is necessary to achieve reconciliation and how trauma exposure and PTSD are associated with those beliefs. METHODS: 1525 participants (51.0% female) were selected using random and purposive sampling in six states and Abyei. Participants reported on traumatic events, PTSD symptoms, and attitudes towards reconciliation mechanisms. RESULTS: Results indicated that 40.7% met symptom criteria for probable PTSD. Most participants thought reconciliation was not possible without prosecuting perpetrators or compensating victims and did not support amnesty. Participants with probable PTSD were more likely to endorse confessions (OR 2.42 [1.75, 3.35]), apologies (OR 2.04 [1.46, 2.83]), and amnesty (OR 1.58 [1.21, 2.08]), and to report that compensation (OR 2.32 [1.80, 3.00]) and prosecution (OR 1.47 [1.15, 1.89]) were not necessary for reconciliation. The more traumatic events people experienced, the more they endorsed criminal punishment for perpetrators (OR 1.07 [1.04, 1.10]) and the less they endorsed confessions (OR 0.97 [0.95, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: People with PTSD may prioritize ending violence via opportunities for reconciliation, while those with more trauma exposure may support more punitive mechanisms. Policy makers should take mental health treatment and trauma into account when designing conflict mitigation, peace building, and justice mechanisms.
PURPOSE: South Sudan is embroiled in a conflict that erupted in December 2013. This study examines what people in South Sudan think is necessary to achieve reconciliation and how trauma exposure and PTSD are associated with those beliefs. METHODS: 1525 participants (51.0% female) were selected using random and purposive sampling in six states and Abyei. Participants reported on traumatic events, PTSD symptoms, and attitudes towards reconciliation mechanisms. RESULTS: Results indicated that 40.7% met symptom criteria for probable PTSD. Most participants thought reconciliation was not possible without prosecuting perpetrators or compensating victims and did not support amnesty. Participants with probable PTSD were more likely to endorse confessions (OR 2.42 [1.75, 3.35]), apologies (OR 2.04 [1.46, 2.83]), and amnesty (OR 1.58 [1.21, 2.08]), and to report that compensation (OR 2.32 [1.80, 3.00]) and prosecution (OR 1.47 [1.15, 1.89]) were not necessary for reconciliation. The more traumatic eventspeople experienced, the more they endorsed criminal punishment for perpetrators (OR 1.07 [1.04, 1.10]) and the less they endorsed confessions (OR 0.97 [0.95, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS:People with PTSD may prioritize ending violence via opportunities for reconciliation, while those with more trauma exposure may support more punitive mechanisms. Policy makers should take mental health treatment and trauma into account when designing conflict mitigation, peace building, and justice mechanisms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Displacement; PTSD; Peace; Reconciliation; War and armed conflict
Authors: Benjamin Coghlan; Richard J Brennan; Pascal Ngoy; David Dofara; Brad Otto; Mark Clements; Tony Stewart Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-01-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Susan M Meffert; Karen Musalo; Akram Osman Abdo; Omayma Ahmed Abd Alla; Yasir Omer Mustafa Elmakki; Afrah Abdelrahim Omer; Sahar Yousif; Thomas J Metzler; Charles R Marmar Journal: Med Confl Surviv Date: 2010 Apr-Jun
Authors: Touraj Ayazi; Lars Lien; Arne Henning Eide; Rachel Jenkins; Rita Amok Albino; Edvard Hauff Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rachel Elizabeth Zettl; Lindsay E Page; Saira M Bhatti; Karen Duong; Tulsie Patel; John R Dykema; Meagan Whitney; Emine R Ayvaci; Carol S North; Jeffrey Sonis Journal: Behav Sci Terror Polit Aggress Date: 2019-12-15
Authors: Lauren C Ng; Jordan S Solomon; Maithri Ameresekere; Judith Bass; David C Henderson; Shubha Chakravarty Journal: Transcult Psychiatry Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Lauren C Ng; Anne Stevenson; Sreeja S Kalapurakkel; Charlotte Hanlon; Soraya Seedat; Boniface Harerimana; Bonginkosi Chiliza; Karestan C Koenen Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.069