Literature DB >> 28400180

Reducing Barriers to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for People With Cognitive Impairments.

Jessica M Kramer1, Ariel Schwartz2.   

Abstract

The field of rehabilitation has increasingly called for the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in research and practice. Given that many rehabilitation patients present with conditions associated with cognitive impairments, it is imperative to reduce barriers to PROM use for this population. The purpose of this article is to develop a comprehensive understanding of cognitive accessibility that can prospectively inform the design of PROMs. We put forth the following definition of cognitive accessibility for PROMs: cognitive accessibility is present when assessment design anticipates respondent variability in cognitive abilities and, to the greatest extent possible, reduces cognitive demands and/or supports cognitive processes to enable respondents with a range of cognitive abilities to interpret and respond to assessment items as intended. Our operationalization of cognitive accessibility in measurement in the field of rehabilitation is informed by 2 assumptions: (1) cognitive accessibility results from an interaction between the individual's capacities and the demands of the assessment and assessment context, and (2) individuals with cognitive impairments have the right to be involved in decisions about their lives, including health care decisions. This article proposes 3 design features that can be optimized for cognitive accessibility: content, layout, and administration procedures. We end with a discussion of next steps that the field of rehabilitation measurement can undertake to advance our understanding of cognitive accessibility.
Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome assessment (health care); Patient reported outcome measures; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28400180     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  11 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcome measures for young people with developmental disabilities: incorporation of design features to reduce cognitive demands.

Authors:  Ariel E Schwartz; Jessica M Kramer; Angela L Longo
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Colleen Gibbons; Nicole Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2021-09-24

3.  The sixth international RASopathies symposium: Precision medicine-From promise to practice.

Authors:  Karen W Gripp; Lisa Schill; Lisa Schoyer; Beth Stronach; Anton M Bennett; Susan Blaser; Amanda Brown; Rebecca Burdine; Emma Burkitt-Wright; Pau Castel; Sandra Darilek; Alwyn Dias; Tuesdi Dyer; Michelle Ellis; Gregg Erickson; Bruce D Gelb; Tamar Green; Andrea Gross; Alan Ho; James Lloyd Holder; Shin-Ichi Inoue; Angie C Jelin; Annie Kennedy; Richard Klein; Maria I Kontaridis; Pilar Magoulas; Darryl B McConnell; Frank McCormick; Benjamin G Neel; Carlos E Prada; Katherine A Rauen; Amy Roberts; Pablo Rodriguez-Viciana; Neal Rosen; Gavin Rumbaugh; Anna Sablina; Maja Solman; Marco Tartaglia; Angelica Thomas; William C Timmer; Kartik Venkatachalam; Karin S Walsh; Pamela L Wolters; Jae-Sung Yi; Martin Zenker; Nancy Ratner
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Investigating child self-report capacity: a systematic review and utility analysis.

Authors:  Katherine B Bevans; Isaac L Ahuvia; Taye M Hallock; Rochelle Mendonca; Stephanie Roth; Christopher B Forrest; Courtney Blackwell; Jessica Kramer; Lauren Wakschlag
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Inclusive approaches to developing content valid patient-reported outcome measure response scales for youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Ariel E Schwartz; Jessica M Kramer
Journal:  Br J Learn Disabil       Date:  2020-10-06

6.  Children in South Africa with and without Intellectual Disabilities' Rating of Their Frequency of Participation in Everyday Activities.

Authors:  Alecia Samuels; Shakila Dada; Karin Van Niekerk; Patrik Arvidsson; Karina Huus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Usability and Reliability of an Accessible Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Software: The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Patient-Reported Outcome (PEDI-PRO).

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Ariel E Schwartz; Daniel K Davies; Steven E Stock; Pengsheng Ni
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb

8.  Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM).

Authors:  Zephanie Tyack; Megan Simons; Steven M McPhail; Gillian Harvey; Tania Zappala; Robert S Ware; Roy M Kimble
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Measuring Patient Activation as Part of Kidney Disease Policy: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Devika Nair; Kerri L Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Accessibility Considerations in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Mark Harniss; Susan Magasi; Dianne Sabat
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.