Literature DB >> 28400034

Association of syntax score with short-term outcomes among acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary PCI.

Sarita Choudhary1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Syntax score (SX) has emerged as a reproducible angiographic tool to quantify the extent of coronary artery disease based on location and complexity of each lesion. It has been shown to predict long-term clinical outcomes in patients with left main or multi-vessel disease and recently also in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the syntax score is associated with short-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: Syntax score was determined in 90 consecutive patients (mean age 54.2±11.6) of STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Outcomes were stratified according to syntax score groups: SX low ≤15 (n=33), SX mid 16-22 (n=30), and SX high ≥23 (n=27). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were nonfatal major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of any repeat revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke at 30 days in patients discharged alive.
RESULTS: Mortality at 30 days was higher in the SX high group compared to the SX mid and SX low group (18.5% vs 3.3% p=0.011), MACE at 30 days was higher in SX high group compared to SX mid and SX low group (48.1% vs 16.6% vs 9.1%, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The syntax score is associated with 30-day mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. In those discharged, it is associated with risk of MACE at 30 days.
Copyright © 2016 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality; Myocardial infarction; PCI; STEMI; SYNTAX score

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28400034      PMCID: PMC5388013          DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Heart J        ISSN: 0019-4832


Introduction

Acute treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is restoration of myocardial perfusion by recanalization of the occluded vessel. Early reperfusion is associated with better outcomes. Thus primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the treatment of choice for acute STEMI. Most scoring systems such as TIMI, GRACE that predict adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) rely on clinical variables such as age, heart rate, blood pressure, Killip class, ST-segment changes, and serum creatinine levels, while not taking into account the characteristics of coronary lesions.1, 2, 3, 4 The SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score (SX) has been developed as a comprehensive angiographic scoring tool for quantification of coronary lesions with respect to their number, location, and complexity. It was initially tested in patients with stable coronary artery disease, multi-vessel disease or complex coronary lesions allocated to PCI or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in the landmark SYNTAX trial.5, 6, 7, 8 Subsequently, this score was also validated for left main disease and in all-comers population undergoing PCI.9, 10 It is a good predictor of adverse cardiovascular events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularisation.9, 11, 12 Recently, it has also validated for risk stratification in STEMI undergoing primary PCI, where it was found associated with mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. Previous studies using the syntax score have focused on long-term clinical outcomes after PCI and data on its impact on short-term outcome is limited. Thus, we determined the association of syntax scores with short-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Methods

Study population

All patients who were admitted at our institution with STEMI and underwent primary PCI during January 2014 to January 2015 were included in the present analysis (n = 90; mean age 54.2 ± 11.6 years). None of these patients had been treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Performa has been designed to collect information regarding age, gender, history of risk factors, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). Patient's clinical parameters, left ventricular function, and killip class were recorded. Laboratory data including hemoglobin, total leukocyte count, platelet count, creatinine, and cardiac enzymes, etc. were noted. Clinical characteristics at baseline are shown in Table 1. Pre-treatment with drugs according to standard guidelines was initiated. Urgent diagnostic coronary angiography followed by primary PCI was performed. All primary PCI procedures were performed by experienced interventional cardiologists using femoral approach. The decision to perform PCI and to implant bare-metal or drug-eluting stents was at the discretion of the operator. Current guidelines for the management of STEMI indicate that culprit-only intervention should be performed acutely during primary PCI in the absence of cardiogenic shock and thus, it was followed at our institution. Pre-dilatation or post-dilatation after stent implantation, thrombosuction, use of eptifibatide was at the operator's choice. There was no restriction on the type, length or number of implanted stents. Baseline lesion and procedure characteristics are listed in Table 2. Exclusion criteria were previous CABG surgery or PCI and if emergent CABG surgery indication was present.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients according to syntax score (SXS).

VariablesN = 90 (%)SX lown = 33 (37%)SX midn = 30 (33%)SX highn = 27 (30%)p value
NumberN = 90n = 33n = 30n = 27
Age, year54.251.3 (±12.74)55.9 (±11.04)55.7 (±10.73)0.213



Gender
Male70 (77.8%)28 (84.8%)22 (73.3%)20 (74.1%)0.47
Female20 (22.2%)5 (15.2%)8 (26.7%)7 (25.9%)



Risk factors
Tobacco use49 (54.4%)17 (51.5%)17 (56.7%)15 (55.5%)0.911
Hypertension39 (43.3%)15 (45.4%)12 (40%)12 (44.4%)0.9
Diabetes24 (26.7%)6 (18.2%)8 (26.7%)10 (37%)0.259
Hyperlipidemia20 (22.2%)7 (21.1%)7 (23.3%)6 (22.2%)0.98
F/H CAD14 (15.5%)5 (15.1%)5 (16.7%)4 (14.8%)0.978



Clinical profile
SBP, mm Hg120.6126.3 (±17.40)124.8 (±13.89)110.6(±13.47)0
Heart rate75.472.4 (±11.3)73.1 (±11.62)80.8 (±14.7)0.023
Killip class ≥213 (14.4%)2 (6.1%)5 (16.6%)6 (22.2%)0.19



Creatinine (mg/dL)1.11.0 (±0.24)1.1 (±0.36)1.2 (±0.49)0.118
Ejection fraction (%)42.345.5 (± 6.90)41.8 (±6.96)39.07 (±7.08)0.002
Time symptom onset to hospital [min]211218195221
Door to balloon time [min]82748982
Total ischemic time (TIT)293292 (±144.6)284 (±144)303 (±155.4)0.887



Type of STEM
AWMI49 (54.4%)15 (45.4%)15 (50%)19 (70.4%)0.263
IWMI ± RV/PWMI32 (35.6%)13 (39.4%)13 (43.3%)6 (22.2%)
Others9 (10%)5 (15.2%)2 (6.7%)2 (7.4%)



In-hospital medication
Aspirin90 (100%)33 (100%)30 (100%)27 (100%)1
Clopidogrel/prasugrel90 (100%)33 (100%)30 (100%)27 (100%)1
Beta blockers70 (77.8%)25 (75.7%)25 (83.3%)20 (74.1%)0.661
ACE inhibitors/ARB80 (88.9%)31 (93.9%)27 (90%)22 (81.5%)0.303
Statins90 (100%)33 (100%)30 (100%)27 (100%)1
Inotropic drugs10 (11.1%)1 (3.0%)3 (10%)6 (22.2%)0.061
Diuretics9 (10%)2 (6.1%)3 (10%)4 (14.8%)0.531
GPIIbIIIa inhibitors43 (47.8%)15 (45.5%)14 (46.7%)14 (51.8%)0.876
Table 2

Basline lesion and procedural characteristics.

VariablesN = 90 (%)SX lown = 33 (%)SX midn = 30 (%)SX highn = 27 (%)p value
SX score17.49.918.423.9



IRA0.012
Left anterior descending40 (44.4%)8 (24.2%)13 (43.3%)19 (70.4%)
Circumflex artery15 (16.7%)8 (24.2%)5 (16.7%)2 (7.4%)
Right coronary artery35 (38.9%)17 (51.6%)12 (40%)6 (22.2%)
Left main disease1 (1.1%)01 (3.3%)00.044



Number of diseased vessels0.044
SVD42 (46.7%)20 (60.6%)13 (43.3%)9 (33.3%)
DVD30 (33.3%)11 (33.3%)11 (36.7%)8 (29.6%)
TVD18 (20%)2 (6.1%)6 (20%)10 (37.1%)
Total occlusion with thrombus81 (90%)29 (87.9%)27 (90%)25 (92.6%)0.833
Total no. of stents implanted1.31.1 (±0.28)1.3 (±0.45)1.6 (±0.48)0



Stent type
BMS19 (21.1%)7 (21.2%)7 (23.3%)5 (18.5%)0.906
DES71 (78.9%)26 (78.8%)23 (76.7%)22 (81.5%)

Determination of Syntax score

The Syntax score was calculated from baseline angiograms, for all coronary lesions with a diameter stenosis greater than 50% in vessels larger than 1.5 mm, using syntax score online calculator. All angiographic variables involved in the calculation were computed by two independent investigators who were blinded to all clinical data. If the infarct-related artery was occluded, it was scored as an occluded artery of <3-month duration.

Study endpoints

The study's primary endpoint was mortality at 30-day follow-up. Secondary endpoints were nonfatal major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of any repeat revascularization, acute coronary syndrome and stroke within 30-day follow-up period in discharged patients. Any repeat revascularization was defined as repeat PCI or bypass grafting of both infarct related artery and non-infarct related artery, driven by ischemic symptoms.

Statistical methods

Continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables are expressed as percentage. The difference in means would be analyzed using student's ‘t’ test. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The difference is categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test.

Results

Out of 90 patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI during 2014–2015, mean syntax score was 17.4 (range 6–46). Groups were computed as SX low ≤15 (n = 33), SX mid 16–22 (n = 30), and SX high ≥23 (n = 27). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1. Mean age, gender, baseline investigations, and risk factor profile – hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, diabetes, and family history of CAD were similar between the three groups. At presentation, patients in SX high group had higher heart rate (80.8 vs 73.1 vs 72.4, p = 0.02) and lower systolic blood pressure (110.6 vs 124.8 vs 126.3, p < 0.001) than SX mid and SX low groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction (mean) was lower in patients with high syntax score compared to those with mid-low scores (39.07% vs 41.8% vs 45.5%, p = 0.002). Killips class, total ischemic time, type of STEMI, and in hospital treatment did not differ between the groups. There were higher rates of left anterior descending as the culprit vessel in SX high group (70.4% vs 43.3% vs 24.25, p = 0.012). Triple vessel disease (37.1% vs 20% vs 6.1%, p = 0.014) and number of stents implanted (1.6 vs 1.3 vs 1.1, p < 0.001) were higher in SX high group than SX low and mid groups.

Outcomes at 30-day follow-up

Six patients died within 30 days of the procedure (4 during hospitalization and 2 after discharge) and 21 MACCE were recorded during this period (Table 3).
Table 3

Clinical outcome at 30 days.

VariablesN = 90 (%)SX lown = 33 (%)SX midn = 30 (%)SX highn = 27 (%)p value
All cause mortality6 (6.7%)01 (3.3%)5 (18.5%)0.01
Cardiac death5 (5.5%)005 (18.5%)0
Any repeat revascularization8 (8.9%)1 (3%)1 (3.3%)6 (22.2%)0.01
Acute coronary syndrome10 (11.1%)1 (3%)3 (10%)6 (22.2%)0.06
Cerebrovascular events3 (3.3%)1 (3%)1 (3.3%)1 (3.7%)0.99
Rehospitalization15 (16.7%)2 (6.1%)5 (16.7%)8 (29.6%)0.05
Overall MACE21 (23.3%)3 (9.1%)5 (16.6%)13 (48.1%)0

Discussion

Syntax score is an important determinant of treatment decision making in stable patients with left main or multi-vessel disease undergoing elective PCI or CABG surgery and is validated to predict the outcomes in these patients. The Syntax score was recently validated in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The first dedicated analysis of the this score in patients with STEMI, published by Garg et al. in 2011, showed that this score is a significantly associated with mortality, MACE, and any stent thrombosis at 1-year follow up. In this study, rates of all cause mortality were higher in patients of SX high group than SX mid group (18.5% vs 3.3%, respectively p = 0.01). Six patients died during hospitalization and follow up period. One of them had acute renal failure due to contrast-induced nephropathy. Four of them were caused by either cardiogenic shock or acute pulmonary edema. One patient with anterior wall STEMI, in SX mid group developed acute pancreatitis with multi-organ dysfunction during hospitalization and died later. Previous studies in patients undergoing primary PCI have also reported syntax score as an independent predictor of mortality.5, 8, 11, 15 Our study shows that patients in the SX high group had a higher prevalence of triple vessel disease compared with those in the SX mid and low. The well-established association between multi-vessel disease and cardiogenic shock may partly explain the increase in the peri-procedural risk and high mortality.11, 14 In addition, as shown in our study, patients with high syntax score had greater systolic dysfunction (lower LVEF) and greater LAD occlusion, so they had greater area of myocardium involvement, which may partly explain bad outcome in this group. Previous studies have shown syntax score as a predictor for TIMI flow grade <3 and no reflow, which are associated with bad outcome.19, 20 Biondi-Zoccai et al. showed in a meta-analysis that patients of STEMI with multi-vessel disease have worse clinical outcomes than those with single-vessel disease. Likewise, Brown et al. showed that lesion complexity was predictive of mortality at a follow-up of 2 years. This observation presumably reflects the predominant role of anatomic complexity of coronary lesions in determining mortality. MACE were more common in patients with SX high group compared to SX mid and SX low group (48.1% vs 16.6% vs 9.1%, p = 0.001). In our study patients with high syntax score had higher rates of any repeat revascularization than those with intermediate and low score (22.2% vs 3.3% vs 3%, p = 0.014). Since patients in SX high group had more multi-vessel disease or complex lesions, not opening the non-culprit lesions during the initial procedure may partly explain these findings. But our study followed PCI of infarct related artery in the light of current ACC/AHA STEMI guidelines. Recently, the Preventive Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction study reported that the primary outcome of cardiac death, MI, or refractory angina was significantly less common in the preventive-PCI group, as compared with optimal medical therapy alone. Therefore, the best strategy for staged revascularization in STEMI with MVD is yet to be clarified further. Similarly, Sorajja et al. reported that multi-vessel disease was associated with a higher rate of revascularization in patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Thus, a high syntax score was found to be associated with re-infarction and need for revascularization. Occurrence of cerebrovascular events did not differ between the three groups. The present study shows that the high Syntax score is associated with mortality and MACE at 30 days in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. These results are in agreement with recent studies showing that the syntax score has risk predictive value both in patients undergoing elective PCI and in those undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.

Study limitations

Number of patients in our study group was less, but it was sufficient to reach statistically significant results and conclusions particularly with respect to 30-day mortality.

Conflicts of interest

The author has none to declare.
  20 in total

1.  Usefulness of the SYNTAX score to predict "no reflow" in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael Magro; Sjoerd T Nauta; Cihan Simsek; Eric Boersma; Elco van der Heide; Evelyn Regar; Ron T van Domburg; Felix Zijlstra; Patrick W Serruys; Robert Jan van Geuns
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Usefulness of the SYNTAX score for predicting clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno; Maria Elena Di Salvo; Glauco Cincotta; Marco Miano; Claudia Tamburino; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score.

Authors:  Amir Halkin; Mandeep Singh; Eugenia Nikolsky; Cindy L Grines; James E Tcheng; Eulogio Garcia; David A Cox; Mark Turco; Thomas D Stuckey; Yingo Na; Alexandra J Lansky; Bernard J Gersh; William W O'Neill; Roxana Mehran; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.

Authors:  Scot Garg; Giovanna Sarno; Patrick W Serruys; Alfredo E Rodriguez; Leonardo Bolognese; Maurizio Anselmi; Nicoletta De Cesare; Salvatore Colangelo; Raul Moreno; Stefania Gambetti; Monia Monti; Laura Bristot; Marco Bressers; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Giovanni Parrinello; Gianluca Campo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno; Piera Capranzano; Maria Elena Di Salvo; Anna Caggegi; Davide Tomasello; Glauco Cincotta; Marco Miano; Martina Patané; Claudia Tamburino; Salvatore Tolaro; Leonardo Patané; Antonio Maria Calafiore; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma; Scot Garg; Giovanna Sarno; Marcel van den Brand; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Nic Van Dyck; Michael Mack; David Holmes; Ted Feldman; Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Eric Bass; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Marie-Angèle M Morel; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paul Sorajja; Bernard J Gersh; David A Cox; Michael G McLaughlin; Peter Zimetbaum; Costantino Costantini; Thomas Stuckey; James E Tcheng; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; Cindy L Grines; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Initial SYNTAX score predicts major adverse cardiac events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Adam J Brown; Liam M McCormick; Parag R Gajendragadkar; Stephen P Hoole; Nick E J West
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David S Wald; Joan K Morris; Nicholas J Wald; Alexander J Chase; Richard J Edwards; Liam O Hughes; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Aspirin in combination with clopidogrel in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Lizhen Qi; Yongxuan Liu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Adherence to guideline recommendations for coronary angiography in a poor South-East Asian setting: Impact on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Andriany Qanitha; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Jose P S Henriques; Idar Mappangara; Muzakkir Amir; Sumarsono G Saing; Bastianus A J M de Mol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Novel predictors and adverse long-term outcomes of No-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Hesham Refaat; Ayman Tantawy; Amr S Gamal; Hanan Radwan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the Systemic Inflammatory Immunologic Index and the Angiographic SYNTAX Score and the TIMI Flow Grade in Acute STEMI: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ali Rostami; Arezou Tajlil; Ahmad Separham; Bahram Sohrabi; Leili Pourafkari; Neda Roshanravan; Naser Aslanabadi; Mojtaba Ziaee; Sina Mashayekhi; Samad Ghaffari
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2021-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.