Literature DB >> 28400028

Predicting Clinical and Echocardiographic Response After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Score Combining Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Parameters.

Anne Bernard1, Aymeric Menet2, Sylvestre Marechaux2, Maxime Fournet3, Frederic Schnell4, Yves Guyomar5, Christophe Leclercq3, Philippe Mabo3, Laurent Fauchier6, Erwan Donal7.   

Abstract

The L2ANDS2 score was previously found to be able to assess the probability of left ventricular (LV) remodeling. We sought to evaluate this score in terms of clinical outcomes: 275 patients with heart failure, from 2 centers, implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device were followed at least 2 years after implantation. Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics including left bundle branch block, age >70 years, nonischemic etiology, LV end-diastolic diameter <40 mm/m2, and septal flash by echocardiography were integrated in 4 scoring systems. Nonresponse to CRT was LV reverse remodeling <15% at 6 months' follow-up and/or occurrence of major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death or transplantation or assistance) during a clinical follow-up of at least 2 years. Ninety-seven patients (36%) demonstrated nonresponse to CRT. The L2ANDS2 score demonstrated the best predictive value (C statistic of 0.783) for predicting absence of LV reverse remodeling and/or occurrence of major cardiovascular event during the 2 years follow-up compared with other scoring systems that do not include septal flash. A L2ANDS2 score ≤4 was associated with a worse outcome (38% survival vs 81% survival, hazard ratio 4.19, 95% CI 2.70 to 6.48, p <0.0001). In conclusion, the L2ANDS2 score is able to assess the probability of nonresponse to CRT in terms of no reverse LV remodeling and/or major cardiovascular event at long-term follow-up. Integrating septal flash in a scoring system adds value over left bundle branch block only.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28400028     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Asif Jafferani; Miguel A Leal
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-06-15

2.  Determinants of left ventricular function improvement for cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.

Authors:  Jung Ae Hong; Sang Eun Lee; Seon-Ok Kim; Min-Seok Kim; Hae-Young Lee; Hyun-Jai Cho; Jin Oh Choi; Eun-Seok Jeon; Kyung-Kuk Hwang; Shung Chull Chae; Sang Hong Baek; Seok-Min Kang; Dong-Ju Choi; Byung-Su Yoo; Kye Hun Kim; Myeong-Chan Cho; Byung-Hee Oh; Jae-Joong Kim
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-29

Review 3.  Septal Flash as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sadie Bennett; Jacopo Tafuro; Simon Duckett; Grant Heatlie; Ashish Patwala; Diane Barker; Arzu Cubukcu; Fozia Zahir Ahmed; Chun Shing Kwok
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2022-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.