| Literature DB >> 28399513 |
Mingji Zhang1,2,3, Fei Yan2,3, Wei Wang2,3, Guohong Li1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Person-organisation fit (P-O fit) is a predictor of work attitude. However, in the area of human resource for health, the literature of P-O fit is quite limited. It is unclear whether P-O fit directly or indirectly affects turnover intention. This study aims to examine the mediation effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between P-O fit and turnover intention based on data from China. DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of community health workers (CHWs) in China in 2013. A questionnaire of P-O fit, job satisfaction and turnover intention was developed, and its validity and reliability were assessed. Multiple regression and structural equation modelling were used to examine the relationship among P-O fit, job satisfaction and turnover intention. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multistage sampling was applied. In total, 656 valid questionnaire responses were collected from CHWs in four provincial regions in China, namely Shanghai, Shaanxi, Shandong and Anhui.Entities:
Keywords: Person organization fit; community health workers; work attitude
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28399513 PMCID: PMC5337699 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure1Confirmatory factor analysis of community health workers' (CHWs') needs structure of person-organisation fit. This figure shows that the structure of CHWs' needs are constituted of the achievement factor and the relatedness factor. e1 to e9 are error terms, while a rectangle icon is an observed variable and a circle icon is a latent variable. A single headed arrow shows a regression path from an independent variable to a dependent variable, while a double-headed arrow shows the covariance between the two variables.
Items of person-organisation fit scale (a five-point Likert scale)
| Means | SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Needs: to what extent do you think the following items can motivate you to work harder? | ||
| A good income | 3.96 | 1.10 |
| A good benefit package | 3.74 | 1.22 |
| Smooth career development | 3.73 | 1.11 |
| Rich learning opportunities | 3.69 | 1.03 |
| Participation in decision-making | 3.3 | 1.10 |
| Honour given by the organisation | 3.41 | 1.11 |
| Respect from the community | 3.85 | 0.93 |
| Good relationship with colleagues | 3.95 | 0.95 |
| Job security (a stable job) | 3.66 | 1.12 |
| Supplies: to what extent do you think your organisation provides the following items? | ||
| A good income | 2.67 | 0.79 |
| A good benefit package | 3.03 | 0.88 |
| Smooth career development | 2.78 | 0.90 |
| Rich learning opportunities | 3.33 | 0.78 |
| Participation in decision-making | 3.33 | 1.05 |
| Honour given by the organisation | 3.28 | 0.74 |
| Respect from the community | 3.8 | 0.69 |
| Good relationship with colleagues | 4.27 | 0.64 |
| Job security (a stable job) | 3.64 | 0.77 |
Demographic information of study sample of community health workers in China, 2013
| Anhui | Shandong (N=233) | Shaanxi (N=154) | Shanghai (N=96) | Total (N=656) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Per cent | N | Per cent | N | Per cent | N | Per cent | N | Per cent | |
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Female | 119 | 68.8 | 200 | 85.8 | 124 | 80.5 | 79 | 82.3 | 522 | 79.6 |
| Male | 54 | 31.2 | 33 | 14.2 | 30 | 19.5 | 17 | 17.7 | 134 | 20.4 |
| Age (years) | ||||||||||
| <29 | 64 | 37.0 | 100 | 42.9 | 39 | 25.3 | 14 | 14.6 | 217 | 33.1 |
| 30–39 | 61 | 35.3 | 65 | 27.9 | 63 | 40.9 | 45 | 46.9 | 234 | 35.7 |
| 40–49 | 37 | 21.4 | 36 | 15.5 | 40 | 26.0 | 35 | 36.5 | 148 | 22.6 |
| 50–59 | 9 | 5.2 | 22 | 9.4 | 12 | 7.8 | 2 | 2.1 | 45 | 6.9 |
| >60 | 2 | 1.2 | 10 | 4.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 1.8 |
| Professional title | ||||||||||
| No title | 19 | 11.0 | 34 | 14.6 | 16 | 10.4 | 7 | 7.3 | 76 | 11.6 |
| Junior | 116 | 67.1 | 126 | 54.1 | 97 | 63.0 | 33 | 34.4 | 372 | 56.7 |
| Intermediate | 34 | 19.7 | 66 | 28.3 | 37 | 24.0 | 55 | 57.3 | 192 | 29.3 |
| Senior | 4 | 2.3 | 7 | 3.0 | 4 | 2.6 | 1 | 1.0 | 16 | 2.4 |
| Professions | ||||||||||
| Doctors of clinical medicine | 18 | 10.4 | 22 | 9.4 | 9 | 5.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 49 | 7.5 |
| General practitioners | 35 | 20.2 | 37 | 15.9 | 29 | 18.8 | 39 | 40.6 | 140 | 21.3 |
| Doctors of traditional medicine | 12 | 6.9 | 13 | 5.6 | 8 | 5.2 | 1 | 1.0 | 34 | 5.2 |
| Doctors of public health | 8 | 4.6 | 18 | 7.7 | 11 | 7.1 | 15 | 15.6 | 52 | 7.9 |
| Nurses | 69 | 39.9 | 88 | 37.8 | 56 | 36.4 | 39 | 40.6 | 252 | 38.4 |
| Medical laboratory technicians | 31 | 17.9 | 55 | 23.6 | 41 | 26.6 | 2 | 2.1 | 129 | 19.7 |
Means, SDs and correlations of indicators of community health workers in China, 2013
| Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 General job satisfaction | 3.55 | 0.74 | 1.00 | ||
| 2 Turnover intention | 2.49 | 0.91 | −0.42* | 1.00 | |
| 3 P-O fit | −0.35 | 0.78 | 0.24* | −0.19* | 1.00 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
P-O fit, person-organisation fit.
Two multiple regression models of JS on P-O fit and TI on P-O fit
| Standardised coefficients | p Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Regression of JS on P-O fit | ||
| P-O fit | 0.25 | 0.00 |
| Province | ||
| Shanghai | 0.13 | 0.00 |
| Shanxi | 0.01 | 0.89 |
| Shandong | 0.06 | 0.22 |
| Model 2: Regression of TI on P-O fit | ||
| P-O fit | −0.19 | 0.00 |
| Age group (years) | ||
| >60 | −0.06 | 0.10 |
| 50- | −0.10 | 0.02 |
| 40- | −0.12 | 0.01 |
| 30- | −0.07 | 0.10 |
| Province | ||
| Shanghai | −0.25 | 0.00 |
| Shanxi | −0.12 | 0.01 |
| Shandong | −0.16 | 0.00 |
JS, job satisfaction; P-O fit, person-organisation fit; TI, for turnover intention.
Figure 2Mediation model with path analysis in AMOS. This figure shows that the effect of person-organisation fit on turnover intention is partially through job satisfaction. Control variables were included in the model. e1 and e2 are error terms, while rectangle icons are observed variables. A single-headed arrow shows the regression path from an independent variable to a dependent variable.
Mediation effect test of job satisfaction on the relationship between P-O fit and turnover intention
| Total effect | Direct effect | Indirect effect | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-O fit → JS | – | 0.25* | – |
| JS → TI | – | −0.37* | – |
| P-O fit → TI | −0.19* | −0.09† | −0.09* |
These are all standardised effects.
*At the 0.001 level.
†Denotes statistical significance at the 0.01 level.
JS, job satisfaction; TI, turnover intention.