| Literature DB >> 28399174 |
Wenfei Liu1, Jianping Wu1, Houbao Fan1, Honglang Duan1, Qiang Li2, Yinghong Yuan1, Hao Zhang1.
Abstract
Eucalyptus species are widely planted for reforestation in subtropical China. However, the effects of Eucalyptus plantations on the regional water use remain poorly understood. In an age sequence of 2-, 4- and 6-year-old Eucalyptus plantations, the tree water use and soil evaporation were examined by linking model estimations and field observations. Results showed that annual evapotranspiration of each age sequence Eucalyptus plantations was 876.7, 944.1 and 1000.7 mm, respectively, accounting for 49.81%, 53.64% and 56.86% of the annual rainfall. In addition, annual soil evaporations of 2-, 4- and 6-year-old were 318.6, 336.1, and 248.7 mm of the respective Eucalyptus plantations. Our results demonstrated that Eucalyptus plantations would potentially reduce water availability due to high evapotranspiration in subtropical regions. Sustainable management strategies should be implemented to reduce water consumption in Eucalyptus plantations in the context of future climate change scenarios such as drought and warming.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28399174 PMCID: PMC5388327 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Site characteristics of the different ages of forest plots (Mean ± SE, n = 3).
| Plantation age (years) | Previous Forests | DBH (cm) | SOC (g kg-1) | TN (g kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9.5 ± 0.2 | 24.9±2.0 | 2.1±0.04 | |
| 4 | 11.7±0.3 | 18.3±0.8 | 2.2±0.01 | |
| 6 | 13.7±0.3 | 17.4±0.6 | 2.0±0.02 |
DBH, SOC and TN represent as diameter at breast height, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, respectively.
Fig 1Average monthly precipitation and temperature in the study area for the year 2013.
Fig 2Monthly changes of soil evaporation in different Eucalyptus plantations (the error bar represents the SD).
Fig 3Monthly changes of soil moisture (gravimetric %) in different Eucalyptus plantation forests (at 5 cm depth).
Fig 4Relationship between soil evaporation and climatic factors i.e. temperature (A), relative humidity (B), soil humidity (C) and precipitation (D).
Fig 5The calculated value of potential evapotranspiration compared with the measured value in the study area.
The calculated results based on our plot data by comparing with the measured results based on the historic meteorological data from the National Climate Center of China.
Estimation of evapotranspiration in different Eucalyptus plantations (mm).
| plantation age (years) | Month | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December | |
| 2 | 12.6 | 27.9 | 53.6 | 89.5 | 107.9 | 104.4 | 131.1 | 136.7 | 100.9 | 28.4 | 40.2 | 43.5 |
| 4 | 12.7 | 28.8 | 56.0 | 97.4 | 117.4 | 113.0 | 142.8 | 148.5 | 109.7 | 28.8 | 42.3 | 46.7 |
| 6 | 12.8 | 29.4 | 57.5 | 104.1 | 125.5 | 119.8 | 153.1 | 159.3 | 117.1 | 29.1 | 43.8 | 49.2 |
Fig 6Absolute (A) and relative values (B) of evapotranspiration in different Eucalyptus plantations.
Fig 7Dynamics of average temperature and precipitation from 1953 to 2013 in the study area.