| Literature DB >> 28399171 |
M M Hasibuzzaman1, Shakhawoat Hossain1, Md Shofikul Islam1,2, Atiqur Rahman1, Adiba Anjum1, Faruk Hossain1, Nayan Chandra Mohanto1, Md Rezaul Karim2, Md Mominul Hoque1, Zahangir Alam Saud1, Hideki Miyataka3, Seiichiro Himeno3, Khaled Hossain1.
Abstract
Chronic exposure to arsenic is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, plausible biomarker for early prediction and the underlying mechanism of arsenic-related CVD have not yet been clearly understood. Endothelial dysfunction plays a central role in the development of CVD. We hypothesized that endothelial damage or dysfunction is an important aspect and may be an early event of arsenic-related CVD. Soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) in serum is thought to be a specific and stable marker for endothelial damage or dysfunction. This study was designed to evaluate the association between chronic exposure to arsenic and sTM among human subjects in arsenic-endemic and non-endemic rural areas in Bangladesh. A total of 321 study subjects (217 from arsenic-endemic areas and 104 from a non-endemic area) were recruited. Subjects' arsenic exposure levels (i.e., drinking water, hair and nail arsenic concentrations) were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy. The subjects' serum sTM levels were quantified by immunoassay kit. The average sTM levels of the subjects in arsenic-endemic and non-endemic areas were 4.58 ± 2.20 and 2.84 ± 1.29 (ng mL-1) respectively, and the difference was significant (p<0.001). Arsenic exposure levels showed a significant (water arsenic: rs = 0.339, p<0.001, hair arsenic: rs = 0.352, p<0.001 and nail arsenic: rs = 0.308, p<0.001) positive associations with sTM levels. Soluble TM levels were higher in the higher exposure gradients if we stratified the subjects into tertile groups (low, medium and high) based on the arsenic concentrations of the subjects' drinking water, hair and nails. Finally, increased levels of sTM were negatively correlated with high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and positively correlated with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). Results of this study show that chronic exposure to arsenic has mild to moderate association with sTM levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28399171 PMCID: PMC5388467 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive characteristics of the study populations in arsenic-endemic and non-endemic areas.
| Parameters | All | Non-endemic | Arsenic-endemic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321 | 104 | 217 | ||
| Male | 170 | 53 | 117 | |
| Female | 151 | 51 | 100 | |
| 36.73 ± 11.36 | 35.02 ± 10.38 | 37.54 ± 11.73 | 0.053 | |
| IQR | (28.00–45.00) | (27.00–40.00) | (28.00–45.00) | 0.062 |
| 20.75 ± 3.01 | 21.27 ± 2.74 | 20.50 ± 3.11 | < 0.05 | |
| IQR | (18.66–22.40) | (19.32–22.84) | (18.32–22.34) | < 0.05 |
| 0.874† | ||||
| Farmers | 141 (82.90) | 43 (81.10) | 98 (83.80) | |
| Business | 4 (2.40) | 1 (1.90) | 3 (2.60) | |
| Students | 8 (4.70) | 4 (7.50) | 4 (3.40) | |
| Tailors | 4 (2.40) | 1 (1.90) | 3 (2.60) | |
| | 13 (7.60) | 4 (7.60) | 9 (7.60) | |
| 0.508† | ||||
| Housewives | 137 (90.70) | 46 (90.20) | 91 (91.00) | |
| Farm workers | 5 (3.30) | 2 (3.90) | 3 (3.00) | |
| Students | 3 (2.00) | 0 | 3 (3.00) | |
| | 6 (4.00) | 3 (5.90) | 3 (3.00) | |
| No formal education | 177 (55.10) | 59 (56.70) | 118 (54.40) | 0.592† |
| Primary | 116 (36.10) | 39 (37.50) | 77 (35.50) | |
| Secondary | 25 (7.80) | 5 (4.80) | 20 (9.20) | |
| Higher | 3 (0.90) | 1 (1.00) | 2 (0.90) | |
| 23.71 ± 7.58 | 23.19 ± 5.51 | 23.95 ± 8.39 | 0.403 | |
| 75.89 ± 11.18 | 70.14 ± 9.59 | 78.64 ± 10.84 | < 0.001 | |
| 117.46 ± 17.24 | 110.58 ± 14.54 | 120.76 ± 17.49 | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 32 (10.00) | 2 (1.90) | 30 (13.80) | < 0.01† |
| No | 289 (90.00) | 102 (98.10) | 187 (86.20) | |
| Yes | 63 (37.1) | 20 (37.70) | 43 (36.80) | 0.902† |
| No | 107 (62.90) | 33 (62.30) | 74 (63.20) | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| 116.91 ± 150.17 | 2.33 ± 2.78 | 171.82 ± 155.09 | < 0.001 | |
| Range (min-max) | (0.03–546.00) | (0.03–13.17) | (0.46–546.00) | |
| 3.88 ± 5.79 | 0.32 ± 0.25 | 5.58 ± 6.38 | < 0.001 | |
| Range (min-max) | (0.02–37.24) | (0.02–1.62) | (0.25–37.24) | |
| 6.61 ± 6.65 | 1.26 ± 1.33 | 9.18 ± 6.66 | < 0.001 | |
| Range (min-max) | (0.15–37.42) | (0.15–8.13) | (0.53–37.42) | |
| Total subjects | 4.02 ± 2.12 | 2.84 ± 1.29 | 4.58 ± 2.20 | < 0.001 |
| Male | 4.40 ± 2.18 | 3.25 ± 1.41 | 4.92 ± 2.27 | < 0.001 |
| Female | 3.58 ± 1.96 | 2.41 ± 0.99 | 4.18 ± 2.07 | < 0.001 |
| | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.05 |
Abbreviations: As, Arsenic; BMI, Body Mass Index; IQR, Inter-quartile range. BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2).
a Mean ± SD.
* p-, ‡ p- and † p-values were obtained by independent sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-square test, respectively.
+ Others included village doctor, carpenter, rickshaw puller, security guard and retired worker.
‡ Others included farmer and laborer.
Fig 1Association between arsenic exposure and serum sTM levels.
Log10-transformed values of water (μg L-1), hair (μg g-1), and nail (μg g-1) arsenic concentrations were used. r and p-values were from Spearman correlation coefficient test.
Fig 2Dose-response relationship between arsenic exposure and sTM levels.
Data were presented as mean ± SE. Dose-response relationship between arsenic exposure and sTM levels in one-way ANOVA was examined by F-test, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test between each group of exposure level. Arsenic concentrations in water: low (0.03–5.22 μg L-1; n = 101), medium (5.30–127.00 μg L-1; n = 110), and high (129.00–546.00 μg L-1; n = 110). Arsenic concentration in hair: low (0.02–0.62 μg g-1; n = 106), medium (0.64–3.36 μg g-1; n = 106), and high (3.40–37.24 μg g-1; n = 109). Arsenic concentrations in nail: low (0.15–2.12 μg g-1; n = 104), medium (2.14–7.45 μg g-1; n = 109), and high (7.45–37.42 μg g-1; n = 108). a and b, Significant from low and medium groups, respectively. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Associations of arsenic exposure and other variables with sTM levels through multiple linear regression analyses.
| Independent variables | Dependent variable sTM levels | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | Males | Females | ||||||||||
| Before adjustment | After adjustment | Before adjustment | After adjustment | Before adjustment | After adjustment | |||||||
| β (95% CI) | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | |||||||
| 0.579 (0.403,0.754) | <0.001 | 0.526 (0.349,0.704) | <0.001 | 0.633 (0.364,0.902) | <0.001 | 0.638 (0.355,0.920) | <0.001 | 0.515 (0.294,0.736) | <0.001 | 0.458 (0.237,0.678) | <0.001 | |
| 0.000 (–0.019,0.020) | 0.983 | 0.016 (–0.010,0.043) | 0.220 | –0.021 (–0.050,0.008) | 0.161 | |||||||
| 0.846 (0.348,1.343) | <0.01 | |||||||||||
| –0.032 (–0.107,0.044) | 0.407 | 0.053 (–0.074,0.180) | 0.410 | –0.083 (–0.172,0.007) | 0.071 | |||||||
| –0.154 (–0.767,0.460) | 0.622 | –0.172 (–0.825,0.480) | 0.603 | |||||||||
| 0.769 (0.010,1.527) | <0.05 | –0.368 (–1.689,0.953) | 0.583 | 1.470 (0.594,2.347) | <0.01 | |||||||
| 1.050 (0.728,1.373) | <0.001 | 0.996 (0.673,1.319) | <0.001 | 0.999 (0.553,1.445) | <0.001 | 0.999 (0.531,1.468) | <0.001 | 1.168 (0.719,1.617) | <0.001 | 1.043 (0.601,1.485) | <0.001 | |
| 0.003 (–0.016,0.022) | 0.768 | 0.016 (–0.010,0.042) | 0.234 | –0.011 (–0.040,0.017) | 0.427 | |||||||
| 0.929 (0.434,1.424) | <0.001 | |||||||||||
| –0.031 (–0.107,0.044) | 0.410 | 0.046 (–0.082,0.173) | 0.481 | –0.086 (–0.175,0.002) | 0.056 | |||||||
| –0.136 (–0.747,0.475) | 0.663 | –0.162 (–0.818,0.495) | 0.628 | |||||||||
| 0.791 (0.038,1.543) | <0.05 | –0.379 (–1.711,0.953) | 0.575 | 1.493 (0.635,2.351) | <0.01 | |||||||
| 1.199 (0.801,1.596) | <0.001 | 1.094 (0.696,1.492) | <0.001 | 1.290 (0.690,1.890) | <0.001 | 1.334 (0.707,1.962) | <0.001 | 1.094 (0.586,1.601) | <0.001 | 0.951 (0.455,1.447) | <0.001 | |
| 0.005 (–0.014,0.025) | 0.597 | 0.021 (–0.006,0.047) | 0.122 | –0.014 (–0.043,0.015) | 0.355 | |||||||
| 0.904 (0.404,1.404) | <0.001 | |||||||||||
| –0.024 (–0.100,0.053) | 0.542 | 0.054 (–0.074,0.182) | 0.406 | –0.072 (–0.163,0.018) | 0.117 | |||||||
| –0.217 (–0.834,0.400) | 0.489 | –0.246 (–0.902,0.409) | 0.459 | |||||||||
| 0.836 (0.075,1.597) | <0.05 | –0.464 (–1.805,0.877) | 0.495 | 1.596 (0.722,2.470) | <0.001 | |||||||
Log10-transformed values of arsenic concentrations were used.
a Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking habit and hypertension.
b Adjusted for age, BMI, smoking habit and hypertension.
c Adjusted for age, BMI and hypertension.
Interaction between exposure and hypertension on sTM levels through univariate regression analyses.
| Independent variables | Dependent variable sTM levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | Males | Females | ||||
| β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | ||||
| 0.568 (0.385,0.752) | <0.001 | 0.654 (0.377,0.931) | <0.001 | 0.447 (0.215,0.679) | <0.001 | |
| 1.037 (–0.701,2.774) | 0.241 | 1.321 (–2.845,5.487) | 0.532 | 1.347 (–0.435,3.129) | 0.137 | |
| –0.271 (–1.089,0.546) | 0.514 | –0.758 (–2.750,1.233) | 0.453 | –0.057 (–0.890,0.777) | 0.894 | |
| 0.945 (0.613,1.278) | <0.001 | 0.982 (0.523,1.442) | <0.001 | 0.936 (0.482,1.390) | <0.001 | |
| –0.322 (–1.495,0.852) | 0.590 | – 1.247 (–3.730,1.236) | 0.323 | 0.395 (–0.816,1.606) | 0.520 | |
| 1.662 (–0.078,3.402) | 0.061 | 1.651 (–1.737,5.039) | 0.337 | 1.857 (–0.028,3.742) | 0.053 | |
| 1.077 (0.664,1.491) | <0.001 | 1.267 (0.647,1.886) | <0.001 | 0.858 (0.340,1.377) | <0.01 | |
| –0.302 (–1.862,1.257) | 0.703 | – 2.654 (–7.232,1.924) | 0.254 | 0.417 (–1.105,1.939) | 0.589 | |
| 1.153 (–0.558,2.864) | 0.186 | 2.551 (–2.087,7.189) | 0.279 | 1.337 (–0.408,3.082) | 0.132 | |
Log10-transformed values of arsenic concentrations were used.
* Interaction was calculated by multiplying the arsenic concentrations and hypertension.