Mark Vitucci1, David M Irvin1, Robert S McNeill1, Ralf S Schmid1, Jeremy M Simon1, Harshil D Dhruv1, Marni B Siegel1, Andrea M Werneke1, Ryan E Bash1, Seungchan Kim1, Michael E Berens1, C Ryan Miller1. 1. Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gliomas are diverse neoplasms with multiple molecular subtypes. How tumor-initiating mutations relate to molecular subtypes as these tumors evolve during malignant progression remains unclear. METHODS: We used genetically engineered mouse models, histopathology, genetic lineage tracing, expression profiling, and copy number analyses to examine how genomic tumor diversity evolves during the course of malignant progression from low- to high-grade disease. RESULTS: Knockout of all 3 retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins was required to initiate low-grade tumors in adult mouse astrocytes. Mutations activating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, specifically KrasG12D, potentiated Rb-mediated tumorigenesis. Low-grade tumors showed mutant Kras-specific transcriptome profiles but lacked copy number mutations. These tumors stochastically progressed to high-grade, in part through acquisition of copy number mutations. High-grade tumor transcriptomes were heterogeneous and consisted of 3 subtypes that mimicked human mesenchymal, proneural, and neural glioblastomas. Subtypes were confirmed in validation sets of high-grade mouse tumors initiated by different driver mutations as well as human patient-derived xenograft models and glioblastoma tumors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oncogenic driver mutations influence the genomic profiles of low-grade tumors and that these, as well as progression-acquired mutations, contribute strongly to the genomic heterogeneity across high-grade tumors.
BACKGROUND: Gliomas are diverse neoplasms with multiple molecular subtypes. How tumor-initiating mutations relate to molecular subtypes as these tumors evolve during malignant progression remains unclear. METHODS: We used genetically engineered mouse models, histopathology, genetic lineage tracing, expression profiling, and copy number analyses to examine how genomic tumor diversity evolves during the course of malignant progression from low- to high-grade disease. RESULTS: Knockout of all 3 retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins was required to initiate low-grade tumors in adult mouse astrocytes. Mutations activating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, specifically KrasG12D, potentiated Rb-mediated tumorigenesis. Low-grade tumors showed mutant Kras-specific transcriptome profiles but lacked copy number mutations. These tumors stochastically progressed to high-grade, in part through acquisition of copy number mutations. High-grade tumor transcriptomes were heterogeneous and consisted of 3 subtypes that mimicked human mesenchymal, proneural, and neural glioblastomas. Subtypes were confirmed in validation sets of high-grade mouse tumors initiated by different driver mutations as well as human patient-derived xenograft models and glioblastoma tumors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oncogenic driver mutations influence the genomic profiles of low-grade tumors and that these, as well as progression-acquired mutations, contribute strongly to the genomic heterogeneity across high-grade tumors.
Authors: Robert S McNeill; Ralf S Schmid; Ryan E Bash; Mark Vitucci; Kristen K White; Andrea M Werneke; Brian H Constance; Byron Huff; C Ryan Miller Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: F Burel-Vandenbos; M Ngo-Mai; B Dadone; I Di Mauro; S Gimet; E Saada-Bouzid; V Bourg; F Almairac; D Fontaine; T Virolle; F Pedeutour Journal: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 8.090
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jörg van den Boom; Marietta Wolter; Rork Kuick; David E Misek; Andrew S Youkilis; Daniel S Wechsler; Clemens Sommer; Guido Reifenberger; Samir M Hanash Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Mark Vitucci; Natalie O Karpinich; Ryan E Bash; Andrea M Werneke; Ralf S Schmid; Kristen K White; Robert S McNeill; Byron Huff; Sophie Wang; Terry Van Dyke; C Ryan Miller Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ralf S Schmid; Jeremy M Simon; Mark Vitucci; Robert S McNeill; Ryan E Bash; Andrea M Werneke; Lauren Huey; Kristen K White; Matthew G Ewend; Jing Wu; C Ryan Miller Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: William H Hicks; Cylaina E Bird; Jeffrey I Traylor; Diana D Shi; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Timothy E Richardson; Samuel K McBrayer; Kalil G Abdullah Journal: Cells Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 6.600