| Literature DB >> 28398254 |
Carlo Camerlingo1, Marianna Portaccio2, Rosarita Tatè3, Maria Lepore4, Ines Delfino5.
Abstract
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) enables the investigation of samples with weak specific Raman signals, such as opaque samples, including fruit juices and pulp. In this paper, biological apple juices and apple/pear pulp have been studied in order to evidence the presence of fructose and pectin, which are components of great relevance for quality assessment of these kinds of products. In order to perform SERS measurements a low-cost home-made substrate consisting of a glass slide decorated with 30-nm-sized gold nanoparticles has been designed and used. By employing a conventional micro-Raman spectroscopy set-up and a suitable data treatment based on "wavelet" denoising algorithms and background subtraction, spectra of pectin and fructose with clear Raman features have been obtained. The results have confirmed the potential of SERS in the food industry for product characterization, also considering the low-cost and the relative ease of the fabrication process of the employed SERS substrate.Entities:
Keywords: commercial fruit juice and fruit-based preparations; fructose; gold nanoparticles (GNPs); pectin; surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28398254 PMCID: PMC5422200 DOI: 10.3390/s17040839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Absorption spectra; (b) TEM image (with scale bar = 100 nm) and (c) Raman spectrum of GNP preparation (see text for details).
Figure 2(a) SERS spectrum of the saturated aqueous solution of fructose; (b) Conventional Raman spectrum of the same fructose solution; (c) Raman spectrum of crystalline fructose. The position of the main modes of crystalline fructose are labelled. Positions of the features of SERS spectrum of fructose solution with unexpected strong intensity (at 333 cm−1, 1095 cm−1 and 1370 cm−1) are reported in brackets.
Experimental positions and relative intensities, as obtained by the deconvolution procedure, of the vibrational modes observed in the Raman spectrum of crystalline fructose and in SERS spectrum of fructose aqueous solutions along with their tentative assignment made according to Ref. [44].
| Crystalline Fructose | Fructose in Aqueous Solution | Assignment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position (cm−1) | Relative Intensity (%) | Position (cm−1) | Relative Intensity (%) | |
| 290 | 10 | - | - | - |
| 344 | 8 | 333 | 81 | C-O-C bending |
| 423 | 39 | 424 | 81 | C-C-C bending (pyranose) |
| 467 | 39 | 492 | 36 | C-C-C bending (furanose) |
| 527 | 37 | 517 | 42 | C-C-O bending (pyranose) |
| 592 | 32 | - | - | - |
| 627 | 100 a | 622 | 100 a | C-C-O bending |
| - | - | 678 | 20 | C-C-O bending (furanose) |
| 778 | 9 | - | - | - |
| 817 | 68 | 815 | 81 | C-C stretching (pyranose) |
| 870 | 63 | 872 | 66 | C-C stretching (furanose) |
| 923 | 19 | 940 | 19 | C-C-H bending (furanose) |
| 977 | 24 | - | - | C-C-H bending (pyranose) |
| 1049 | 46 | 1058 | 20 | C-O stretching |
| 1082 | 51 | 1095 | 128 | C-O-H bending |
| 1139 | 31 | - | - | C-O stretching (pyranose) |
| 1176 | 33 | - | - | C-O stretching (furanose) |
| 1241 | 25 | - | - | - |
| 1264 | 44 | 1272 | 43 | CH2 twisting |
| 1338 | 18 | 1340 | 52 | - |
| - | - | 1370 | 97 | CH2 wagging |
| 1404 | 18 | 1412 | 31 | - |
| 1466 | 38 | 1460 | 100 | CH2 bending |
a Taken as intensity reference.
Figure 3Raman spectra of apple juice after background signal subtraction and denoising procedure, obtained from bare juice drop (a), and from juice drop on the home-made GNPs-based SERS substrate (b). The spectra are arbitrarily shifted along the y-axis.
Positions of the modes outlined by the deconvolution procedure in SERS spectra of commercial biological apple juice and of apple/pear smashed pulp and their tentative assignment to fructose or/and pectin [44,46,47].
| Apple Juice—Peak Position (cm−1) | Apple/Pear Pulp—Peak Position (cm−1) | Fructose | Pectin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 417 | 417 | X | |
| 475 | 482 | X | |
| 512 | 512 | X | |
| 538 | 535 | X | |
| 591 | 595 | X | |
| 624 | 620 | X | |
| 679 | 679 | X | |
| 730 | X | ||
| 870 | X | X | |
| 918 | 922 | X | |
| 967 | X | ||
| 1004 | |||
| 1050 | X | ||
| 1090 | X | ||
| 1120 | |||
| 1173 | 1173 | X | |
| 1213 | |||
| 1254 | 1266 | X | |
| 1315 | |||
| 1342 | X | ||
| 1373 | X | ||
| 1398 | |||
| 1458 | 1455 | X | |
| 1520 | |||
| 1585 | 1581 | ||
| 1554 | |||
| 1617 | 1611 | ||
| 1746 |
Figure 4(a) Biological apple juice: the Raman spectrum (I) is compared with SERS response (black line) (II) and spectrum deconvolution in Lorentzian functions (III). Red line represents the convolution of component peaks. In orange are indicated the peaks assigned to pectin and in blue those assigned to fructose; (b) Spectra of amorphous dry fructose (blue line) and of amidate lime/lemon pectin (orange line) [48].
Figure 5(a) Apple/pear smashed pulp: the Raman spectrum (I) is compared with SERS response (black line) (II) and spectrum deconvolution in Lorentzian functions (III). Red line represents the convolution of component peaks. In orange are indicated the peaks assigned to pectin and in blue those assigned to fructose. (b) Spectra of amorphous dry fructose (blue line) and of amidate lime/lemon pectin (orange) [48].