Literature DB >> 28396919

Transient severe motion in the arterial phase during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of patients with multiple MR examinations.

Won Hyeong Im1, Ji Soo Song2,3,4, Eun Hae Park1,5,6, Hyo Sung Kwak1,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients undergoing multiple gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) examinations who experienced transient severe motion (TSM) in the arterial phase were affected by the TSM noted in the first examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 214 patients who underwent three or more repeated gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Three radiologists scored all of the examinations demonstrating a motion artifact using a five-point rating scale. Risk factor analysis and comparison of TSM recurrence rates were performed in the whole study population as well as in a subpopulation of patients with TSM.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of TSM was 5.9% (54/922), which was observed in 40 patients. Thirty-two patients had one episode of TSM, and eight patients had recurrent TSM. Although TSM in the first examination increased the risk of recurrent TSM in the whole population (OR 24.45; P < 0.001), the incidence of recurrent TSM was low (2.4%, 22/922). On subpopulation analysis, TSM in the first examination did not influence recurrent TSM (OR 0.36; P = 0.250).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing multiple gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR examinations who experienced recurrent TSM were not affected by TSM in the first examination. Therefore, a single episode of TSM should not be considered a risk factor of recurrent TSM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial phase; Artifact; Gadoxetate disodium; Magnetic resonance imaging; Motion artifact

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396919     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1145-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  4 in total

1.  Artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using view-sharing from two different vendors versus single arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Won Jae Lee; Soohyun Ahn; Na Young Hwang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of transient severe motion in gadoxetate disodium and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI: effect of modified breath-holding method.

Authors:  Ji Soo Song; Eun Jung Choi; Eun Hae Park; Ju-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multiparametric imaging for detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and perfusion-CT: which parameters work best?

Authors:  Mustafa Kurucay; Christopher Kloth; Sascha Kaufmann; Konstantin Nikolaou; Hans Bösmüller; Marius Horger; Wolfgang M Thaiss
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Respiratory motion artefacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist/Eovist) and Gd-DOTA (Dotarem)-enhanced dynamic phase liver MRI after intensified and standard pre-scan patient preparation: A bi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Christian Wybranski; Florian Siedek; Robert Damm; Angelos Gazis; Ortrud Wenzel; Stefan Haneder; Thorsten Persigehl; Susanne Steinhauser; Maciej Pech; Frank Fischbach; Katharina Fischbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.