Literature DB >> 28396208

Efficacy of a high potency O1 Manisa foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle against heterologous challenge with a field virus from the O/ME-SA/Ind-2001 lineage collected in North Africa.

Emma Fishbourne1, Anna B Ludi2, Ginette Wilsden1, Pip Hamblin1, Bob Statham1, Abdelghani Bin-Tarif1, Emiliana Brocchi3, Santina Grazioli3, Aldo Dekker4, Phaedra Eblé4, Donald P King1.   

Abstract

Outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in North Africa (2013) and the Gulf States (2013) of the Middle East have been caused by a FMD viral lineage (O/ME-SA/Ind-2001) that was before 2013 restricted to the Indian Sub-continent. This study was undertaken to assess the in vivo efficacy of a FMD virus emergency vaccine type O1 Manisa against heterologous challenge with a representative field virus (O/ALG/3/2014) from this emerging lineage. This widely available vaccine was selected since in vitro vaccine-matching results gave inconclusive results as to whether or not it would be protective. Three groups of five cattle were vaccinated with O1 Manisa (homologous potency ≥6PD50/dose) using study guidelines outlined in the European Pharmacopeia, and challenged at 21days post-vaccination by tongue inoculation. All animals that were vaccinated with the lowest dose (1/16) of vaccine developed generalised FMD, defined as vesicular lesions at the feet. One animal vaccinated with a 1/4 dose of the vaccine also developed generalised disease, as did two animals vaccinated with the full dose of vaccine. These results indicate that the heterologous potency of this high potency O1 Manisa vaccine was approximately 3.5 PD50/dose. These data support the use of the O1 Manisa vaccine for FMD control in areas where FMDV is endemic e.g. North Africa, and motivate further studies to evaluate other vaccine candidates (or multivalent combinations) that might be potentially used for emergency purposes in FMD-free settings.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Challenge; Foot-and-mouth disease virus; In vivo potency; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396208     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Laser and light therapy for treatment of radiation dermatitis].

Authors:  H-J Laubach; J Robijns
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Avidity of Polyclonal Antibodies to Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Bovine Serum Measured Using Bio-Layer Interferometry.

Authors:  Andrew E Shaw; Alison Burman; Amin Asfor; Emiliana Brocchi; Santina Grazioli; Clare Browning; Anna Ludi; Tobias J Tuthill; Donald P King
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Efficacy of a high-potency multivalent foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine in cattle against heterologous challenge with a field virus from the emerging A/ASIA/G-VII lineage.

Authors:  Ryan Waters; Anna B Ludi; Veronica L Fowler; Ginette Wilsden; Clare Browning; Simon Gubbins; Bob Statham; Abdelghani Bin-Tarif; Valerie Mioulet; David J King; Claire Colenutt; Emma Brown; Pascal Hudelet; Donald P King
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Surveillance Using Pooled Milk on a Large-Scale Dairy Farm in an Endemic Setting.

Authors:  Bryony Armson; Simon Gubbins; Valérie Mioulet; Ibrahim A Qasim; Donald P King; Nicholas A Lyons
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-27

Review 5.  A history of FMD research and control programmes in Southeast Asia: lessons from the past informing the future.

Authors:  Stuart D Blacksell; Jarunee Siengsanan-Lamont; Somjai Kamolsiripichaiporn; Laurence J Gleeson; Peter A Windsor
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 6.  Towards improvements in foot-and-mouth disease vaccine performance.

Authors:  Graham J Belsham
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Immunogenicity of imported foot-and-mouth vaccines in different species in Mongolia.

Authors:  Gerelmaa Ulziibat; Odonchimeg Maygmarsuren; Bodisaikhan Khishgee; Ganzorig Basan; Batkhuyag Sandag; Sodnomdarjaa Ruuragc; Georgina Limon; Ginette Wilsden; Clare Browning; Donald P King; Anna B Ludi; Nicholas A Lyons
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Evaluation of immunogenicity and cross-reactive responses of  vaccines prepared from two chimeric serotype O foot-and-mouth disease viruses in pigs and cattle.

Authors:  Pinghua Li; Shulun Huang; Jingjing Zha; Pun Sun; Dong Li; Huifang Bao; Yimei Cao; Xingwen Bai; Yuanfang Fu; Xueqing Ma; Kun Li; Hong Yuan; Jing Zhang; Zhixun Zhao; Jian Wang; Keqiang Zhang; Yingli Chen; Qiang Zhang; Shuyun Qi; Zaixin Liu; Zengjun Lu
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Evaluation of a polyvalent foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine containing A Saudi-95 against field challenge on large-scale dairy farms in Saudi Arabia with the emerging A/ASIA/G-VII viral lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas A Lyons; Anna B Ludi; Ginette Wilsden; Pip Hamblin; Ibrahim Ahmed Qasim; Simon Gubbins; Donald P King
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Cross-Protection Induced by a A/MAY/97 Emergency Vaccine Against Intra-Serotype Heterologous Challenge with a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus from the A/ASIA/G-VII Lineage.

Authors:  Aldo Dekker; Beatriz Sanz-Bernardo; Nagendrakumar Balasubramanian Singanallur; Anna B Ludi; Jacquelyn Horsington; Phaedra L Eblé; Donald P King; Wilna Vosloo
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.