Literature DB >> 28395310

National Estimates of Exposure to Formaldehyde in Italian Workplaces.

Alberto Scarselli1, Marisa Corfiati1, Davide Di Marzio1, Sergio Iavicoli1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Formaldehyde is classified as human carcinogen and the association with nasopharyngeal cancer has been observed in many epidemiological studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate data about occupational exposure levels to formaldehyde in the Italian working force.
Methods: Airborne concentrations of formaldehyde were extracted from the Italian database on occupational exposure to carcinogens and refer to the period 1996-2014. Descriptive statistics were calculated for exposure-related variables. The number of workers potentially exposed was estimated for the activity sectors better characterized in the database. An analysis through linear mixed models was performed to determine factors influencing the exposure level.
Results: A total of 1610 formaldehyde exposure measurements were selected from the database, having an overall arithmetic mean of 0.12 mg m-3 and a geometric mean of 0.04 mg m-3. The activity sectors with the highest number of measurements were the manufacturing of chemicals and chemicals products (N = 529) in men and the health and social work in women (N = 105). The number of workers potentially exposed in the selected sectors was 49450, and the most predictive independent variables of the exposure level resulted to be the occupational group and the year of measurement. Conclusions: The occupational exposure to formaldehyde occurs in a variety of different sectors, but currently workers at higher risk are those employed in the healthcare sector and in the wood processing industry. Prevention measures have to be targeted to reduce the risk to workers' health, also in a gender perspective. This study confirms the important role of occupational exposure databases as a valuable source of data for the epidemiological assessment of risks in workplaces.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exposure assessment; formaldehyde; occupational health; surveillance system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28395310     DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxw004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  7 in total

Review 1.  Environmental Aldehyde Sources and the Health Implications of Exposure.

Authors:  Pritam Sinharoy; Stacy L McAllister; Megana Vasu; Eric R Gross
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Changes in Work Practices for Safe Use of Formaldehyde in a University-Based Anatomy Teaching and Research Facility.

Authors:  Paul T J Scheepers; Martien H F Graumans; Gwendolyn Beckmann; Maurice van Dael; Rob B M Anzion; Maarten Melissen; Nicole Pinckaers; Luuk van Wel; Laurie M A de Werdt; Vera Gelsing; Albert van Linge
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Formaldehyde Exposure and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Allegra; Giovanna Spatari; Stefano Mattioli; Stefania Curti; Vanessa Innao; Roberta Ettari; Andrea Gaetano Allegra; Concetto Giorgianni; Sebastiano Gangemi; Caterina Musolino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Occupational exposure to airborne formaldehyde in hospital: setting an automatic sampling system, comparing different monitoring methods and applying them to assess exposure.

Authors:  Nicola Mucci; Stefano Dugheri; Venerando Rapisarda; Marcello Campagna; Giacomo Garzaro; Andrea Farioli; Giovanni Cappelli; Giulio Arcangeli
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.275

5.  The formation of SCEs as an effect of occupational exposure to formaldehyde.

Authors:  Federica Ghelli; Enrico Cocchi; Valeria Bellisario; Martina Buglisi; Giulia Squillacioti; Alfredo Santovito; Roberto Bono
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Determination of Carbonyl Compounds in Different Work Environments: Comparison between LC-UV/DAD and LC-MS/MS Detection Methods.

Authors:  Federica Castellani; Arianna Antonucci; Ivano Pindinello; Carmela Protano; Matteo Vitali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  How improvements in monitoring and safety practices lowered airborne formaldehyde concentrations at an Italian university hospital: a summary of 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Stefano Dugheri; Daniela Massi; Nicola Mucci; Nicola Berti; Giovanni Cappelli; Giulio Arcangeli
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.