Literature DB >> 28395286

Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction in Hemodialysis Patients: Prevalence, Disease Prediction and Prognosis.

Marlies Antlanger1, Stefan Aschauer2, Chantal Kopecky1, Manfred Hecking1, Johannes J Kovarik1, Johannes Werzowa1,3, Julia Mascherbauer2, Bernd Genser4,5, Marcus D Säemann1,6, Diana Bonderman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a main cause of mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is known to only affect a minority of patients, little is known about the prevalence, associations with clinical characteristics and prognosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
METHODS: We included 105 maintenance HD patients from the Medical University of Vienna into this prospective single-center cohort study and determined the prevalence of HFpEF (per the 2013 criteria of the European Society of Cardiology) and HFrEF (EF <45%), using standardized post-HD transthoracic echocardiography. We also assessed clinical, laboratory and volume status parameters (by bioimpedance spectroscopy). These parameters served to calculate prediction models for both disease entities, while clinical outcomes (frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations and/or cardiac death) were assessed prospectively over 27±4 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: All but 4 patients (96%) had evidence of diastolic dysfunction. 70% of the entire cohort fulfilled HF criteria (81% HFpEF, 19% HFrEF). Age, female sex, body mass index, blood pressure and dialysis vintage were predictive of HFpEF (sensitivity 86%, specificity 63%; AUC 0.87), while age, female sex, NT pro-BNP, history of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were predictive of HFrEF (sensitivity 85%, specificity 90%; AUC 0.95). Compared to patients without HF, those with HFpEF and HFrEF had a higher risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular reason and/or cardiac death (adjusted HR 4.31, 95% CI 0.46-40.03; adjusted HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.08-9.75, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF are highly prevalent in HD patients while HFrEF only affects a minority. Distinct patient-specific characteristics predict diagnosis of either entity with good accuracy.
© 2017 The Author(s)Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ejection fraction; Heart failure; Hemodialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28395286     DOI: 10.1159/000473868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res        ISSN: 1420-4096            Impact factor:   2.687


  14 in total

1.  Associations of sensitive cardiac troponin-I with left ventricular morphology, function and prognosis in end-stage renal disease patients with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kenichiro Otsuka; Koki Nakanishi; Kenei Shimada; Haruo Nakamura; Hitoshi Inanami; Hiroki Nishioka; Kohei Fujimoto; Noriaki Kasayuki; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Cardiac metabolic remodelling in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nikayla Patel; Muhammad Magdi Yaqoob; Dunja Aksentijevic
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 42.439

3.  Comparison of Inflammatory Markers in the Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Yinjiao Zhao; Hui Zhang; Peiyu Song; Xiaoyu Chen; Peipei Han; Chenghu Fang; Chen Yu; Qi Guo
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.249

4.  Heart failure management in dialysis patients: Many treatment options with no clear evidence.

Authors:  Bethany Roehm; Gaurav Gulati; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Left ventricular diastolic pressure gradient and outcome in advanced chronic kidney disease patients with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Yue Zhong; Yuyan Cai; Mei Liu; Wenjuan Bai; Fang Wang; Hong Tang; Li Rao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Coronary microcirculation and left ventricular diastolic function: comparison between patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Gkirdis; Katerina K Naka; Lampros Lakkas; Panagiota Manolakaki; Anila Duni; Konstantinos Koulousios; Rigas Kalaitzidis; Evangelia Dounousi; Lampros K Michalis; Christos S Katsouras
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-09-26

7.  The effect of high-flow arteriovenous fistulas on systemic haemodynamics and brain oxygenation.

Authors:  Jan Malik; Anna Valerianova; Vladimir Tuka; Pavel Trachta; Vladimira Bednarova; Zdenka Hruskova; Marcela Slavikova; Mitchell H Rosner; Vladimir Tesar
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-23

8.  The effect of spironolactone on diastolic function in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  T Hauser; V Dornberger; U Malzahn; S J Grebe; D Liu; S Störk; M Nauck; N Friedrich; M Dörr; C Wanner; V Krane; F Hammer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Exploring the relation between mortality and left ventricular structure and function in stable hemodialysis treated patients, a longitudinal multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Lazar A Chisavu; Adrian Apostol; Gheorghe N Pop; Viviana Ivan; Oana Schiller; Flaviu Bob; Luciana Marc; Adelina Mihaescu; Florica Gadalean; Iulia Grosu; Bogdan Timar; Adalbert Schiller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impact of Systemic Volume Status on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance T1 Mapping.

Authors:  Marlies Antlanger; Stefan Aschauer; Andreas A Kammerlander; Franz Duca; Marcus D Säemann; Diana Bonderman; Julia Mascherbauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.