Literature DB >> 28395146

The action-specific effect of execution on imagination of reciprocal aiming movements.

Emma Yoxon1, Sandra M Pacione2, Joo-Hyun Song3, Timothy N Welsh2.   

Abstract

Past research has shown that the movement times of imagined aiming movements were more similar to actual movement times after the individual has experienced executing the movements. The purpose of the present study was to determine if experience with a set of movements altered the imagination of movements that were not experienced. Participants imagined a series of reciprocal aiming movements in different movement difficulty contexts (created by altering target width and movement amplitude) before and after actually executing a series of aiming movements. The range of difficulties of the imagined movements included difficulty contexts that were within (Experiment 1) or outside (Experiment 2) the range of difficulty experienced during execution. It was found that imagined movement times of movements within the range of movement difficulties experienced were more consistent with Fitts' Law after movement experience, whereas imagination of more difficult movements was not altered by experience. It is suggested that execution did not enhance imagination of more difficult movements because the relative contributions of motor planning and control to the more difficult movements were different from those in the experienced movements. Thus, the enhancement of imagination through experience might only occur when mechanisms underlying the executed and imagined movements are similar.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imagery; Imagination; Motor processes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28395146      PMCID: PMC6169305          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  29 in total

1.  Causes and consequences of imitation.

Authors:  C Heyes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

3.  Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal; Dagmar Sternad; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Robert W Proctor; E J Capaldi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Eye-hand coordination in rhythmical pointing.

Authors:  Stefano Lazzari; Denis Mottet; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Fitts' law is not continuous in reciprocal aiming.

Authors:  Raoul Huys; Laure Fernandez; Reinoud J Bootsma; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Mental imagery in the motor context.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  On the relationship between the execution, perception, and imagination of action.

Authors:  Lokman Wong; Gerome A Manson; Luc Tremblay; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines.

Authors:  Corina Schuster; Roger Hilfiker; Oliver Amft; Anne Scheidhauer; Brian Andrews; Jenny Butler; Udo Kischka; Thierry Ettlin
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution within the spatial domain - Does motor imagery account for signal-dependent noise?

Authors:  James W Roberts; Greg Wood; Caroline J Wakefield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.