Literature DB >> 28393913

Cisplatin selects short forms of the mitochondrial DNA OriB variant (16184-16193 poly-cytosine tract), which confer resistance to cisplatin.

Taku Amo1,2, Naomi Kamimura1, Hiromasa Asano2, Sadamitsu Asoh1, Shigeo Ohta1.   

Abstract

A number of alternations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been reported in different types of cancers, and the role of mtDNA in cancer has been attracting increasing interest. In order to investigate the relationship between mtDNA alternations and chemosensitivity, we constructed cybrid (trans-mitochondrial hybrid) cell lines carrying a HeLa nucleus and the mtDNA of healthy individuals because of the presence of somatic alternations in the mtDNA of many cancer cells. After a treatment with 1.0 μg/mL cisplatin for 10 days, we isolated 100 cisplatin-resistant clones, 70 of which carried the shorter mtDNA OriB variant (16184-16193 poly-cytosine tract), which was located in the control region of mtDNA. Whole mtDNA sequencing of 10 clones revealed no additional alternations. Re-construction of the HeLa nucleus and mtDNA from cisplatin-resistant cells showed that cisplatin resistance was only acquired by mtDNA alternations in the control region, and not by possible alternation(s) in the nuclear genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28393913      PMCID: PMC5385546          DOI: 10.1038/srep46240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


A number of alternations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been reported in different types of cancers1. Approximately 40~70% of cancers harbour somatic mtDNA alternations1, and mtDNA mutations have been shown to increase tumorigenicity23 and regulate tumour cell metastasis4. However, recent extensive mtDNA sequencing analysis of cancer biopsies using next-generation sequencer revealed that mtDNA somatic mutations have no discernible effect on cancer development, but the mutations which perturb mitochondrial functions are less likely to be maintained in cancer cells5. Most anti-cancer drugs, including cisplatin (cis-diaminedichloroplatinum(II)) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), induce apoptosis6. It has already been established that mitochondria play important roles not only in energy production, but also in the regulation of apoptosis. We previously showed that pathogenic mtDNA mutations derived from patients with mitochondrial encephalopathy suppressed apoptosis induced by cisplatin2, and cells harbouring mtDNA alternations derived from human pancreatic cancer cell lines were more resistant to anti-cancer drugs than cells harbouring mtDNAs from healthy individuals7. Since mtDNA encodes only 13 subunits of respiratory chain complexes and all other mitochondrial proteins are encoded by genes in nuclear DNA, difficulties are associated with ensuring that the small effects attributed to mtDNA variations are not confounded by different nuclear DNA backgrounds. In order to overcome this issue, trans-mitochondrial hybrid cells (cybrids) with different mtDNA complements but the same nuclear DNA background were used in these studies89. Cybrids were generated by repopulating HeLa cells devoid of mtDNA with mtDNA derived from the enucleated cells of cisplatin-resistant clones or their parental cell. This technique allowed for the evaluation of mtDNA alternations under an identical nuclear background. In the present study, we demonstrated that a treatment with cisplatin induced mtDNA alternations. Using cybrid technology, we showed that mtDNA alternations confer resistance to cisplatin.

Results

Isolation of cisplatin-resistant cells

Since most cancer cells harbour somatic alternations in mtDNA and these alternations may be associated with resistance to anti-cancer drugs10, we used cybrid cells (A2, 8W5, 9W3, and 9W4) carrying normal mtDNA to isolate cisplatin-resistant cells. These cells (2 × 107 cells each) were exposed to 1.0 μg/mL cisplatin for 10 days and continue to culture in the absence of cisplatin for additional 10 days. The resulting surviving clones were isolated as cisplatin-resistant cells (Fig. 1). We isolated 100 clones (28 clones from 8W5, 27 clones from 9W3, and 45 clones from 9W4), while no clones were obtained from A2 cybrid cells.
Figure 1

Scheme for the construction of cybrids and isolation of cisplatin-resistant cells.

Since many cancer cell lines have somatic mtDNA alternations, the 9W4 cybrid, which has HeLa nuclear DNA and normal human mtDNA, was used for the cisplatin treatment. In order to evaluate the effects of mtDNA alternations caused by the cisplatin treatment, 9W4 and R13 were enucleated and fused with EB8 neo ρ0 containing a neomycin-resistant gene.

The isolated clones were suspecting of having alternations in nuclear DNA as well as in mtDNA. In order to select clones with mtDNA alternations, mitochondrial dehydrogenase activities were evaluated using the WST-1 assay (Fig. 2). All assayed clones showed reductions in their mitochondrial dehydrogenase activities.
Figure 2

Mitochondrial dehydrogenase activities assessed by the WST-1 assay.

The percentage of activity is presented relative to parental 9W4 cells. Error bars indicate S.E.M. (n = 3). The clones of grey columns were subjected to entire mtDNA sequencing.

Mitochondrial DNA sequencing to detect mtDNA alternations in cisplatin-resistant cells

We examined the entire mtDNA sequences of the parental 9W4 cybrid and 10 cisplatin-resistant clones (R13, R15, R29, R31, R32, R33, R36, R44, R45, and R58), which exhibited relatively low mitochondrial dehydrogenase activities (Fig. 2, grey columns). The 9W4 cybrid has a mtDNA T16189C variant (known as the OriB variant11) in the control region, which has been detected in 28.7% of Japanese individuals12. Furthermore, the T16189C substitution generates an uninterrupted homopolymeric cytosine tract (poly-C tract) between mtDNA nucleotide positions 16184 and 16193, and causes heteroplasmic length variations in the poly-C tract presumably due to slippage during mtDNA replication13. Therefore, its sequence electropherogram shows an unreadable sequence beyond the poly-C tract (Fig. 3A). The parental 9W4 cybrid showed 11 continuous cytosine peaks in the mtDNA 16184–16193 region, whereas all 10 cisplatin-resistant clones, including the R13 cybrid, only showed 10 (Fig. 3A). These 10 clones had a shorter mtDNA 16184–16193 poly-C tract than that of parental 9W4, which was confirmed by a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (Fig. 3B). There were no additional alternations in any of the 10 clones. Among the cybrid cell lines used for the cisplatin treatment, 8W5 and 9W3 also harbour the OriB variant. But A2, from which there were no resistant clones were obtained, does not harbour the OriB variant. Sixty out of the remaining 90 cisplatin-resistant clones were also found to have the shorter poly-C tract in a further sequencing analysis of the fragment containing the OriB variant.
Figure 3

(A) Sequence electropherograms of mtDNA 16189 T and 16189 C. Since 9W4 cybrid has the mtDNA 16189 C variant, which causes mtDNA 16184–16193 poly-C length heteroplasmy, the electropherogram shows an unreadable sequence beyond the poly-C tract. The cisplatin-resistant R13 clone has a shorter poly-C tract than the parental 9W4 cybrid. (B) A restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the mtDNA 16184–16193 poly-C tract. The 53-bp DNA fragment contains the mtDNA 16184–16193 region. Full-length image is presented in Supplementary Figure S1.

Cisplatin and 5-FU sensitivities

In order to confirm the cisplatin sensitivities of the isolated resistant clones, R13 and 9W4 cybrids were cultivated in medium containing cisplatin (Fig. 4A–C). Significant cell survival differences were observed after 2 or 3 days. However, no significant differences were noted in cell survival with the 5-FU treatment (Fig. 4D and E).
Figure 4

Survival of 9W4 and R13 cybrids exposed to anti-cancer drugs (cisplatin or 5-FU).

(A) 0.4 μg/mL of cisplatin, (B) 1.0 μg/mL of cisplatin, (C) 2.5 μg/mL of cisplatin, (D) 30 μg/mL of 5-FU, and (E) 100 μg/mL of 5-FU. The cell survival fraction is given as a percentage of the respective untreated control. Closed symbols, 9W4 cybrid; open symbols, R13 cybrid. Error bars indicate S.E.M. (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Re-construction of cybrids

Nuclear DNA alternations have been suggested to confer cisplatin resistance as well as a shorter mtDNA poly-C tract of the OriB variant. In order to exclude this possibility, we re-transferred mtDNA from the cisplatin-resistant R13 clone to ρ0 (mtDNA-less) cells, which have nuclear DNA untreated with cisplatin, and named these cells R13c (Fig. 1). EB8 neo ρ0 cells14, which have a neomycin-resistant gene, were used to exclude mtDNA donor cybrids, without which it was not possible to distinguish between successfully constructed cybrids and cybrids that failed to enucleate. The nuclear DNA of parental 9W4 was also replaced in the same manner and named 9W4c (Fig. 1). The entire mtDNA sequences of 9W4c and R13c were identical to those of their parental cells, 9W4 and R13, respectively. Additionally, their mtDNA poly-C tracts of the OriB variant exhibited similar length distributions (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the newly constructed cybrids 9W4c and R13c had identical nuclear DNA, which was not treated with cisplatin, but different length variations in their mtDNA poly-C tracts of the OriB variant. In order to assess cisplatin sensitivity, 9W4c, R13c, and their parental cybrids were cultivated in the presence of 1.0 μg/mL cisplatin for 7 days. Surviving cells were counted under a fluoromicroscope after double-staining with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide. Newly constructed R13c cells were more resistant to cisplatin than 9W4c cells, similar to their parental cybrids (Fig. 5A), and this was confirmed by a flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that the differences observed in cisplatin resistance between R13c and 9W4c only arose from mtDNA. Therefore, the length of the mtDNA poly-C tract of the OriB variant affects cisplatin resistance.
Figure 5

Survival assessment of re-constructed cybrids exposed to 1.0 μg/mL of cisplatin for 7 days.

Cells were double-stained with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide. Hoechst-positive and propidium iodide-negative cells were interpreted as surviving cells. (A) Cells were imaged with a fluoromicroscope and counted using ImageJ. (B) Cells were treated with trypsin and subjected to a flow cytometric analysis. Error bars indicate S.E.M. (n = 3). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Characterisation of cisplatin-resistant cybrids

Since the poly-C tract is located in the control region of mtDNA, we examined mitochondrial DNA and RNA levels in cisplatin-resistant cybrids. The amount of mtDNA was analysed by Southern blotting and no significant change was observed (Fig. 6A). Northern blotting also revealed no change in the stationary amounts of MT-CO2 mRNA transcribed from mtDNA (Fig. 6B).
Figure 6

(A) The amount of DNA in cybrids was analysed by Southern blotting. In order to detect mtDNA, the MT-CO2 region in mtDNA was used as a probe. Nuclear DNA (nDNA) was the loading control and the 18S ribosomal DNA region was used as the probe. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Figure S2. (B) The expression of mtDNA and nDNA analysed by Northern blotting. Blots of total RNA extracted from cybrids were hybridised with MT-CO2- and GAPDH-specific probes. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Figure S3.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated that the length of the mtDNA poly-C tract of the OriB variant affects cisplatin resistance. The OriB variant (T16189C substitution), which is present in 10% of Europeans, 30% of Asians, 50% of Pima Indians, and >95% Polynesians1115, generates an uninterrupted poly-C tract between mtDNA nucleotide positions 16184 and 16193. The uninterrupted poly-C tract is prone to replication slippage and creates heteroplasmic length variations within an individual1617. 9W4, the parental cybrid cell line used in this study, harbours the 16189C variant and 16184–16193 poly-C length heteroplasmy (Fig. 3). The poly-C tract length of 9W4 was mainly longer than 10 bp (the 16189T variant) and the cisplatin treatment apparently expanded mtDNA with diminished the poly-C length. Since additional mutations were excluded by whole mtDNA sequencing and nuclear replacements, we concluded that cisplatin resistance was acquired by poly-C length alternations. This is supported by the fact that no cisplatin-resistant clones were obtained from A2 cybrid, which harbour mtDNA 16189T and does not poly-C length heteroplasmy. The T16189C variant is now known as the OriB variant11 because the OriB origin of replication is located close to 16189 in the mitochondrial control region18. Thus, it is possible that differences in poly-C tract lengths may affect mtDNA replication and/or transcription. However, we did not detect any differences between the cisplatin-resistant R13 cybrid and its parental 9W4 cybrid (Fig. 6). The differences may be too small to be detected in the experiments conducted in the present study. The OriB variant was reported to be associated with type 2 diabetes in Europeans and Asians11192021. However, the effects of the OriB variant may only emerge in a specific environment and/or under a specific nuclear background222324. In the present study, we used HeLa cells as the nuclear donor. The original mitochondrial DNA of HeLa is African haplogroup L325 and its nuclear DNA is presumably of an African descent. The effects of poly-C tract length variations may be masked under the nuclear background of HeLa. Most anti-cancer drugs, including cisplatin and 5-FU, induce apoptosis6. Once cisplatin enters a cell with a relatively low chloride concentration, one or both of its chloride ligands are replaced by water molecules, generating a positively charged hydrated species that reacts with nucleophilic sites on intracellular macromolecules26. Cisplatin binds mtDNA with higher efficiency than to nuclear DNA (nDNA) presumably because positively charged species are attracted by mitochondria in response to the highly negative membrane potential2728. Cisplatin forms covalent adducts with DNA mainly at the N-7 of guanine29 and preferentially forms DNA adducts at runs of consecutive guanine nucleotides (poly-G; complementary strand of poly-C)30. Therefore, the mtDNA poly-C tract of the OriB variant is assumed to be a primary target of cisplatin and no other mutations were found in our experiments. Cross-linked DNA with cisplatin has been suggested to trigger apoptosis31. 5-FU shows different mechanisms of anti-cancer action to cisplatin. It inhibits thymidylate synthase and its metabolites are incorporated into RNA and DNA32. Indeed, the R13 cybrid did not show resistance to 5-FU (Fig. 4). This study showed that the length of the mtDNA poly-C tract of the OriB variant affected cisplatin resistance. It is possible that cisplatin may have directly attacked the longer poly-C tracts of mtDNA and inhibited their replication, resulting in the selection of shorter poly-C tracts. Although it was reported that the pattern of the OriB poly-C length heteroplasmy in sister cells that had been produced by replication slippage were similar33, cells harbouring the shorter pattern may be present at very low frequency. Such cells might be selected as the resistant cells during the treatment of cisplatin. Indeed, the resistant cells did not grow to form apparent clones. A previous study reported that mtSSB (mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein) has lower binding affinity for the 16189C variant than the 16189T variant20. Since the shorter poly-C tracts selected by cisplatin were similar in length to 16189T, short poly-C tracts may have higher mtSSB affinities than long poly-C tracts and be more protective against nucleophilic attacks by cisplatin derivatives.

Methods

Cells and construction of cybrids

The cells used in this study were as follows: EB8 ρ0 (mtDNA-less) cells derived from human cervical cancer HeLa cells9; EB8 neo ρ0 cells, which were resistant to G418, were constructed by introducing a neomycin-resistant gene14; 8W5, 9W3, 9W4, and A2 cells were cybrid cells constructed by transferring wild-type mtDNA from three different healthy individuals into EB8 ρ0 cells2. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium:Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Uridine (50 μg/mL) was supplemented for ρ0 cells. Cybrids were constructed as described previously89. Briefly, cisplatin-resistant R13 cells and their parental 9W4 cells were enucleated by exposure to cytochalasin B followed by centrifugation. The enucleated cells were fused with EB8 neo ρ0 cells with polyethylene glycol Hybri-Max (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Cybrids were selected in medium containing G418 (Invitrogen). Binuclear cells were eliminated by a flow cytometer (Cell Lab Quanta; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).

WST-1 assay

Mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity was assessed by the WST-1 assay (Cell Counting Kit; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan), in which the tetrazolium salt WST-1 is converted into a coloured dye by mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzymes34. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells in 100 μL of medium were placed in a 96-well microculture plate, and incubated at 37 °C for 2 hours. Ten microliters of WST-1 solution was then added and cells were incubated for 1 h. Optical absorbance at a test wavelength of 450 nm and reference wavelength of 600 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Immuno Mini NJ-2300; BioTec, Tokyo, Japan).

Mitochondrial DNA sequencing and a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis

Whole mitochondrial DNA sequencing was performed as previously described35. In order to assess T16189C poly-C length heteroplasmy, PCR products between mtDNA 15879 and 16545 were digested by Afa I and then resolved by a 20% polyacrylamide gel. The A2 cybrid, which harbours mtDNA 16189T, was used as a control of poly-C length heteroplasmy.

Anti-cancer drug sensitivity assay

Cells were seeded on 12-well plates at a density of 3.5 × 104 cells/well. After one day, medium was replaced with DMEM/F-12 containing 0.40, 1.0, and 2.5 μg/mL cisplatin (Yakult, Tokyo, Japan) or 30 and 100 μg/mL 5-FU (Sigma) plus 1.0 μM folinic acid. Cells were imaged each day and attached cells were counted using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). In order to assess the cisplatin sensitivity of re-constructed cybrids, cells cultivated in the presence of 1.0 μg/mL cisplatin for 7 days were double-stained with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide, and then imaged with a fluoromicroscope. Alternatively, double-stained cells were treated with trypsin and subjected to a flow cytometric analysis with a Cell Lab Quanta (Beckman Coulter). Hoechst-positive and propidium iodide-negative cells were interpreted as surviving cells.

Southern and Northern blotting

Total DNA from cybrids was prepared as described previously36. In Southern blotting, total DNA was digested by Pvu II, separated by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis, and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. [α-32P]dCTP-labelled DNA fragments corresponding to the region of MT-CO2 (mtDNA) and 18S ribosomal DNA (nDNA) were used as probes. The oligonucleotide sequences of primers to prepare probes are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Total RNA from cybrids was prepared using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). In Northern blotting, total RNA was denatured by a heat treatment, separated by a 1.5% agarose/formaldehyde gel, and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. [α-32P]dCTP-labelled DNA fragments corresponding to the region of MT-CO2 and GAPDH were used as probes. The oligonucleotide sequences of primers to prepare probes are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Statistical Analysis

Values are presented as means ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean). The significance of differences between means was assessed by the unpaired Student’s t-test; P values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Amo, T. et al. Cisplatin selects short forms of the mitochondrial DNA OriB variant (16184–16193 poly-cytosine tract), which confer resistance to cisplatin. Sci. Rep. 7, 46240; doi: 10.1038/srep46240 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  35 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the sequence-specific interaction of damaging agents with DNA: emphasis on antitumor agents.

Authors:  V Murray
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1999

2.  A high frequency of mtDNA polymorphisms in HeLa cell sublines.

Authors:  Corinna Herrnstadt; Gwen Preston; Richard Andrews; Patrick Chinnery; Robert N Lightowlers; Douglass M Turnbull; Iwona Kubacka; Neil Howell
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Functional effects of cancer mitochondria on energy metabolism and tumorigenesis: utility of transmitochondrial cybrids.

Authors:  Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Yewei Ma; Lee-Jun C Wong
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Molecular analysis of mitochondrial hypervariable region 1 in 394 Japanese individuals.

Authors:  Hideaki Kato; Yoshitaka Maeno; Hiroshi Ohira; Yoshihiro Yamada; Masataka Nagao
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 1.376

Review 5.  Contribution of somatic mutations in the mitochondrial genome to the development of cancer and tolerance against anticancer drugs.

Authors:  S Ohta
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Length heteroplasmy in the first hypervariable segment of the human mtDNA control region.

Authors:  K E Bendall; B C Sykes
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Type 2 diabetes is associated with a common mitochondrial variant: evidence from a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Joanna Poulton; Jian'an Luan; Vincent Macaulay; Susie Hennings; Jo Mitchell; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Mitochondrial DNA alterations in colorectal cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Naoto Chihara; Taku Amo; Akira Tokunaga; Ryo Yuzuriha; Alexander M Wolf; Sadamitsu Asoh; Hideyuki Suzuki; Eiji Uchida; Shigeo Ohta
Journal:  J Nippon Med Sch       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.920

9.  ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis.

Authors:  Kaori Ishikawa; Keizo Takenaga; Miho Akimoto; Nobuko Koshikawa; Aya Yamaguchi; Hirotake Imanishi; Kazuto Nakada; Yoshio Honma; Jun-Ichi Hayashi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mitochondrial DNA coding and control region variants as genetic risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Liou; Jin-Bor Chen; Mao-Meng Tiao; Shao-Wen Weng; Tiao-Lai Huang; Jiin-Haur Chuang; Shang-Der Chen; Yao-Chung Chuang; Wen-Chin Lee; Tsu-Kung Lin; Pei-Wen Wang
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.