Literature DB >> 28393673

Lower Extremity Revascularization Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Directional Atherectomy: Final Results of the EValuatIon of the PantheriS OptIcal COherence Tomography ImagiNg Atherectomy System for Use in the Peripheral Vasculature (VISION) Study.

Arne G Schwindt1, J Gray Bennett2, William H Crowder2, Suhail Dohad3, Sean F Janzer4, Jon C George5, Barry Tedder6, Thomas P Davis7, Ian M Cawich8, Roger S Gammon9, Patrick E Muck10, John P Pigott11, Dwight A Dishmon12, Lou A Lopez13, Jaafer A Golzar14, Jack R Chamberlin15, Michael J Moulton16, Ramzan M Zakir17, Amir K Kaki18, Gary J Fishbein19, Huey B McDaniel20, Ayala Hezi-Yamit21, John B Simpson21,22, Arjun Desai21,23.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided atherectomy catheter in treating patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease.
METHODS: The VISION trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01937351) was a single-arm, multicenter, global investigational device exemption study enrolling 158 subjects (mean age 67.2±10.5 years; 87 men) across 20 participating sites. In this cohort, 198 lesions were treated with an average length of 53±40 mm using the Pantheris catheter alone or Pantheris + adjunctive therapy. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major adverse events (MAEs) through 6 months (objective performance goal 43.2%). Technical success (primary efficacy outcome) was defined as the percent of target lesions with a residual diameter stenosis ≤50% after treatment with the Pantheris device alone (objective performance goal 87.0%). Procedural success was defined as reduction in stenosis to ≤30% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy. Tissue specimens retrieved from each treated lesion were histologically analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of OCT image guidance.
RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome was achieved in 192 (97.0%) of the 198 lesions treated with the Pantheris catheter. Across all lesions, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 78.7%±15.1% at baseline to 30.3%±11.8% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001) and to 22.4%±9.9% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy (p<0.001). Of the 198 target lesions, 104 (52.5%) were treated with the Pantheris alone, 84 (42.4%) were treated with Pantheris + adjunctive angioplasty, and 10 (5.1%) with Pantheris + angioplasty + stenting. The composite MAE outcome through 6 months occurred in 25 (16.6%) of 151 subjects. There were no clinically significant perforations, 1 (0.5%) catheter-related dissection, 4 (2%) embolic events, and a 6.4% clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate at 6 months. The 40-lesion chronic total occlusion (CTO) subset (mean lesion length 82±38 mm) achieved a similar significant reduction in stenosis to 35.5%±13.6% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001). Histological analysis of atherectomy specimens confirmed <1% adventitia in 82.1% of the samples, highlighting the precision of OCT guidance. Characterization of the OCT-guided lesions revealed evidence of an underestimation of disease burden when using fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSION: OCT-guided atherectomy for femoropopliteal disease is safe and effective. Additionally, the precision afforded by OCT guidance leads to greater removal of plaque during atherectomy while sparing the adventitia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adventitia; angioplasty; atherectomy; femoropopliteal segment; guidance; histology; occlusion; optical coherence tomography; peripheral vascular disease; plaque; stenosis; stent; target lesion revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28393673     DOI: 10.1177/1526602817701720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  8 in total

1.  State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ramya C Mosarla; Ehrin Armstrong; Yonatan Bitton-Faiwiszewski; Peter A Schneider; Eric A Secemsky
Journal:  J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv       Date:  2022-08-20

2.  An update on vessel preparation in lower limb arterial intervention.

Authors:  William Ormiston; Shelagh Dyer-Hartnett; Rukshan Fernando; Andrew Holden
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2020-11-27

3.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after directional versus rotational atherectomy in peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Adam Janas; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Buszman; Aleksandra Kolarczyk-Haczyk; Wojciech Trendel; Maciej Pruski; Wojciech Wojakowski; Paweł Buszman; Radosław S Kiesz
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.426

4.  Five-year outcomes after revascularization of superficial femoral artery occlusion using Ocelot catheter.

Authors:  Przemysław Nowakowski; Piotr Buszman; Adam Janas; Stefan Kiesz; Pawel Buszman
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  How Much Debulking with Atherectomy is Enough When Treating Infrainguinal Arterial Interventions? The Balance Between Residual Stenosis and Adventitial Injury.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-04-05

6.  Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Bethany G Wardle; Graeme K Ambler; Rami W Radwan; Robert J Hinchliffe; Christopher P Twine
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 7.  Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging.

Authors:  Maaz Bj Syed; Alexander J Fletcher; Rachael O Forsythe; Jakub Kaczynski; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck; Edwin Jr van Beek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Vessel Preparation Is Essential to Optimize Endovascular Therapy of Infrainguinal Lesions.

Authors:  François Saucy; Hervé Probst; Rafael Trunfio
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.