Literature DB >> 28393651

Anti-Müllerian hormone does not predict time to pregnancy: results of a prospective cohort study.

M Depmann1, S L Broer1, M J C Eijkemans2, I A J van Rooij1, G J Scheffer1, J Heimensem1, B W Mol3, F J M Broekmans1.   

Abstract

In order to study whether ovarian reserve tests (ORTs) can predict time to ongoing pregnancy, we conducted a prospective cohort study in a cohort of healthy pregnancy planners. A total of 102 pregnancy planners were followed for 1 year, or until ongoing pregnancy occurred, after cessation of contraceptives). A baseline measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and antral follicle count (AFC) was conducted. At the end of follow-up, a semen analysis was performed and chlamydia antibody titres were assessed. A univariate prediction model demonstrated age and the AFC to be significantly capable of predicting time to pregnancy (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.01; 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.02 respectively). In the multivariate model, however, correcting for female age, we found no predictive effect of AMH, basal FSH or the AFC for time to ongoing pregnancy (hazard ratios 1.43, 95% CI 0.84-2.46, p = 0.36; 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.06, p = 0.43; 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.08, respectively). This was confirmed by the low C-statistic. We therefore concluded that baseline AMH, AFC or FSH levels do not predict time to ongoing pregnancy in a cohort of healthy pregnancy planners. These results limit the usability of these ORTs in the assessment of current fertility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMH; conception; fecundability; prediction; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28393651     DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1306848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  6 in total

1.  Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in nurses working night shifts.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Lauren J Tanz; Christina C Lawson; Penelope P Howards; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; A Heather Eliassen; Eva S Schernhammer; Janet W Rich-Edwards
Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 1.663

2.  Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age.

Authors:  Anne Z Steiner; David Pritchard; Frank Z Stanczyk; James S Kesner; Juliana W Meadows; Amy H Herring; Donna D Baird
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The correlation between AMH assays differs depending on actual AMH levels.

Authors:  Å Magnusson; G Oleröd; A Thurin-Kjellberg; C Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  Potential pitfalls of reproductive direct-to-consumer testing.

Authors:  Frank Z Stanczyk; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Rogerio A Lobo
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in women with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kate Wiles; Ellen Anckaert; Francesca Holden; Jan Grace; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Liz Lightstone; Lucy C Chappell; Kate Bramham
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-12-12

6.  The Value of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in the Prediction of Spontaneous Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Lin; Miaomiao Jing; Wenjun Zhu; Xiaoyu Tu; Qi Chen; Xiufang Wang; Youbing Zheng; Runju Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.