F C Okeke1, S Raja2, K L Lynch3, S Dhalla4, M Nandwani5, E M Stein4, B Chander Roland4, M A Khashab4, P Saxena4,6, V Kumbhari4, N K Ahuja4, J O Clarke5. 1. Division of Hospital Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 6. Division of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is characterized by impaired EGJ relaxation with intact or weak peristalsis. Our aims were to evaluate: (i) prevalence, (ii) yield of fluoroscopy, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), (iii) outcomes, and (iv) whether this data differed based on quantitative EGJ relaxation. METHODS: Studies that met criteria for EGJOO were identified. Demographics, encounters, endoscopy, radiology, treatment decisions, and outcomes were extracted. KEY RESULTS: Sixty studies were identified. Dysphagia was the most common symptom. Forty patients underwent barium esophagram (BE): normal (11), hiatal hernia (20), spasm/dysmotility (17), EGJ narrowing (10), compression (2), Schatzki's ring (5), malrotation (1), gastric volvulus (1), mass (1). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed in 41 patients: normal (19), hiatal hernia (13), Schatzki's ring (6), esophagitis (3), esophageal candidiasis (3), mass (1). EUS was performed in 20 patients and was frequently normal. Twenty-two patients underwent intervention. While transient improvement was noted in the majority, persistent improvement was seen in only one of nine patients (dilatation), four of six patients (botulinum toxin), and three patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy. No patients treated with medical therapy alone had improvement in dysphagia. There was no difference in symptoms or outcomes based on quantitative EGJ relaxation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The manometric criterion EGJOO defines a heterogeneous clinical group. While BE, EGD, and EUS all provide complementary information, a significant percentage of these studies will be normal. For patients with dysphagia, outcome may depend on EGJ disruption. There were no differences in symptoms our outcomes based on quantitative EGJ relaxation.
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is characterized by impaired EGJ relaxation with intact or weak peristalsis. Our aims were to evaluate: (i) prevalence, (ii) yield of fluoroscopy, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), (iii) outcomes, and (iv) whether this data differed based on quantitative EGJ relaxation. METHODS: Studies that met criteria for EGJOO were identified. Demographics, encounters, endoscopy, radiology, treatment decisions, and outcomes were extracted. KEY RESULTS: Sixty studies were identified. Dysphagia was the most common symptom. Forty patients underwent barium esophagram (BE): normal (11), hiatal hernia (20), spasm/dysmotility (17), EGJ narrowing (10), compression (2), Schatzki's ring (5), malrotation (1), gastric volvulus (1), mass (1). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed in 41 patients: normal (19), hiatal hernia (13), Schatzki's ring (6), esophagitis (3), esophageal candidiasis (3), mass (1). EUS was performed in 20 patients and was frequently normal. Twenty-two patients underwent intervention. While transient improvement was noted in the majority, persistent improvement was seen in only one of nine patients (dilatation), four of six patients (botulinum toxin), and three patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy. No patients treated with medical therapy alone had improvement in dysphagia. There was no difference in symptoms or outcomes based on quantitative EGJ relaxation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The manometric criterion EGJOO defines a heterogeneous clinical group. While BE, EGD, and EUS all provide complementary information, a significant percentage of these studies will be normal. For patients with dysphagia, outcome may depend on EGJ disruption. There were no differences in symptoms our outcomes based on quantitative EGJ relaxation.
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Ezra N Teitelbaum; Christy M Dunst; Kevin M Reavis; Ahmed M Sharata; Marc A Ward; Steven R DeMeester; Lee L Swanström Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Joseph R Triggs; Dustin A Carlson; Claire Beveridge; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Joseph R Triggs; Dustin A Carlson; Claire Beveridge; Anand Jain; Michael Y Tye; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 11.382