Edoardo Errichiello1,2, Tiziana Venesio3. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 14, 27100, Pavia, Italy. edoardo.errichiello01@universitadipavia.it. 2. Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Unit of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Starda Provinciale 142, Candiolo, 10060, Turin, Italy. edoardo.errichiello01@universitadipavia.it. 3. Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Unit of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Starda Provinciale 142, Candiolo, 10060, Turin, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mitochondrial DNA alterations have widely been reported in many age-related degenerative diseases and tumors, including colorectal cancer. In the past few years, the discovery of inter-genomic crosstalk between nucleus and mitochondria has reinforced the role of mitochondrial DNA variants in perturbing this essential signaling pathway and thus indirectly targeting nuclear genes involved in tumorigenic and invasive phenotype. FINDINGS: Mitochondrial dysfunction is currently considered a crucial hallmark of carcinogenesis as well as a promising target for anticancer therapy. Mitochondrial DNA alterations include point mutations, deletions, inversions, and copy number variations, but numerous studies investigating their pathogenic role in cancer have provided inconsistent evidence. Furthermore, the biological impact of mitochondrial DNA variants may vary tremendously, depending on the proportion of mutant DNA molecules carried by the neoplastic cells (heteroplasmy). CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we discuss the role of different type of mitochondrial DNA alterations in colorectal carcinogenesis and, in particular, we revisit the issue of whether they may be considered as causative driver or simply genuine passenger events. The advent of high-throughput techniques as well as the development of genetic and pharmaceutical interventions for the treatment of mitochondrial dysfunction in colorectal cancer are also explored.
INTRODUCTION: Mitochondrial DNA alterations have widely been reported in many age-related degenerative diseases and tumors, including colorectal cancer. In the past few years, the discovery of inter-genomic crosstalk between nucleus and mitochondria has reinforced the role of mitochondrial DNA variants in perturbing this essential signaling pathway and thus indirectly targeting nuclear genes involved in tumorigenic and invasive phenotype. FINDINGS:Mitochondrial dysfunction is currently considered a crucial hallmark of carcinogenesis as well as a promising target for anticancer therapy. Mitochondrial DNA alterations include point mutations, deletions, inversions, and copy number variations, but numerous studies investigating their pathogenic role in cancer have provided inconsistent evidence. Furthermore, the biological impact of mitochondrial DNA variants may vary tremendously, depending on the proportion of mutant DNA molecules carried by the neoplastic cells (heteroplasmy). CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we discuss the role of different type of mitochondrial DNA alterations in colorectal carcinogenesis and, in particular, we revisit the issue of whether they may be considered as causative driver or simply genuine passenger events. The advent of high-throughput techniques as well as the development of genetic and pharmaceutical interventions for the treatment of mitochondrial dysfunction in colorectal cancer are also explored.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer therapy; Colorectal carcinogenesis; D-loop; Heteroplasmy; Mitochondrial DNA variants; Nuclear-mitochondrial crosstalk; Oxidative stress; mtDNA copy number alterations
Authors: Katherine A Janeway; Su Young Kim; Maya Lodish; Vânia Nosé; Pierre Rustin; José Gaal; Patricia L M Dahia; Bernadette Liegl; Evan R Ball; Margarita Raygada; Angela H Lai; Lorna Kelly; Jason L Hornick; Maureen O'Sullivan; Ronald R de Krijger; Winand N M Dinjens; George D Demetri; Cristina R Antonescu; Jonathan A Fletcher; Lee Helman; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yiping He; Jian Wu; Devin C Dressman; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Sanford D Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos Journal: Nature Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Claudine M Samanic; Jamie K Teer; Zachary J Thompson; Jordan H Creed; Brooke L Fridley; L Burt Nabors; Sion L Williams; Kathleen M Egan Journal: Mitochondrion Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Claudine M Samanic; Jamie K Teer; Zachary J Thompson; Jordan H Creed; Sepideh Mokhtari; Brooke L Fridley; L Burt Nabors; Sion L Williams; Kathleen M Egan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Carlos Jhovani Pérez-Amado; Hugo Tovar; Laura Gómez-Romero; Fredy Omar Beltrán-Anaya; Verónica Bautista-Piña; Carlos Dominguez-Reyes; Felipe Villegas-Carlos; Alberto Tenorio-Torres; Luis Alberto Alfaro-Ruíz; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Silvia Jiménez-Morales Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 6.244