| Literature DB >> 28393124 |
Tatiana Maria Inêz-Ferreira1, Leonel Mendoza2, Raquel Vilela3, Hélida Monteiro de Andrade4, João Paulo Haddad4, Fernanda Freire Campos Nunes1, Isabela Moreira Gondim1, Tânia Mara Pinto Dabés Guimarães1, Vicente de Paulo Coelho Peixoto de Toledo1.
Abstract
Pythium insidiosum immunomodulatory vaccine (PiV) has been tested in clinical and experimental pythiosis. Previous data showed that P. insidiosum immunogens have the ability to switch the Th2 immune response, normally in place during pythiosis, to a curative Th1 response. Pythiosis cannot be reproduced in experimental rodents with the exception of rabbits, and thus thorough evaluation of PiV´s immunomodulatory properties has been limited by the lack of a compatible inbred mouse model. In this study, we took advantage of the murine BALB/c Leishmania infection model, where infected mice produce a Th2 response, to evaluate the PiV Th2 to Th1 immunomodulatory potential. Twenty-one days following challenge with L. major, large cutaneous granulomas developed in control mice, consistent with the expected Th2 response. In contrast, Leishmania-induced cutaneous lesions in PiV-immunized mice were minimal or absent. Flow cytometry analysis of spleen cells from mice immunized with PiV and subsequently challenged with L. major displayed more CD4+ and CD8+ cells than the control group. Moreover, spleen cells from mice that were immunized with PiV then challenged with L. major secreted high levels of IFN-γ, with a moderate IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 mixed cytokine profile upon in vitro re-stimulation with PiV. Anti-P. insidiosum IgG1 in immunized animals was present at low titers suggesting a minor immunological role for this Ig isotype in this model. Our preliminary data showed that BALB/c mice challenged with L. major represent an attractive model in which to study PiV´s immunomodulatory properties.Entities:
Keywords: Immunology; Infectious diseases; Physiology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28393124 PMCID: PMC5377577 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of the PIV soluble proteins. The PiV soluble proteins are shown on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by silver nitrate staining. The numbers indicate the molecular weight in kilo-Daltons (kDa).
Fig. 2Mice in the control group challenged with L. major and/or PiV immunogens. Panel A depicts a mouse from the control group inoculated with L. major displaying granulomatous lesions (arrows) 20 days after challenge. Panel B shows PiV immunized mice previously challenged with L. major. Note the presence of necrotic tissue (dark areas) and the edema of the infected pads (Panel A) whereas panel B shows the absence of necrotic tissue and mild edema in PiV-immunized mice. The figures in the lower section of Panels A and B show a close-up of the infected areas. Granuloma size measurements of BALB/c mice in the control group (● = same as Fig. 1, panel A) and PiV-immunized mice and then challenged with L. major promastigotes (■ = same as Fig. 1 panel B) is shown in Panel C. Note the difference in granuloma size between the control group and PiV-immunized mice and then challenged with L. major on days 20 and 30. After day 30 PiV immunized mice slowly increased the size of their granulomas.
Flow Cytometer analysis showing the percentage of mice splenic cells CD4+, CD8+ expressing IFN-γ or IL-10 in control group (non-immunized, non-infected) and immunized (PiV only).
| Mice group | CDC4+ Phenotype | CDC8+ Phenotype | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-γ | IL-10 | IFN-γ | IL-10 | |
| Control | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.046 | 0.0 |
| PiV | 1.44 | 0.65 | 6.67 | 0.0 |
Fig. 3Flow Cytometry analysis of data from PIV-immunized mice previously challenged with Leishmania major. The figure shows data analyzed by FlowJo software from the splenocyte pool of 10 previously PiV-immunized mice challenged with L. major. Panel A shows the lymphocyte population depicting the lymphocytic region of the mouse spleen cells (square window). Panel B depicts the acquisition window in the region of CD3+ cells. The distribution of two acquisition windows characterizing the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytic populations is shown in Panel C. Panel D shows the acquisition window for CD8+ cells expressing intracellular IFN-γ (Panel D).
Fig. 4ELISA analysis of cytokines from the control group and the PiV- and Leishmania major-challenged mice. This figure shows that the control group, challenged only with L. major, exhibited significant differences in cytokine production compared with mice challenged with both PiV and L. major. The expression of IFN-γ (ELISA) in the supernatant of mouse splenic cells after 72 h of stimulation with PiV (OD 3.3 = 660 pg/ml) or Concanavalin A (ConA) (OD 0.4 = 111 pg/ml) is shown in Panel A. The graph in panel A displays contrasting differences with the control group challenged with L. major only (undetectable levels, below sensitivity of the test). Panel B depicts expression of IL-2 (ELISA) in the supernatant of mouse splenic cells stimulated with PiV (OD 0.39 = 150 pg/ml) or with ConA (OD 2.7 = 1000 pg/ml) after 72 h of stimulation. This panel also shows significant differences with the control group challenged only with L. major (OD 0.09 = 15 pg/ml). Panel C shows the expression of IL-10 in ELISA of splenocytes in PiV-immunized, L. major challenged BALB/c mice after 72 h of stimulation with PiV (OD 0.79 = 450 pg/ml) or ConA (OD 0.10 = 50 pg/ml). IL-10 detection in non-immunized mice was low (OD 0.03 = 15 pg/ml).
Fig. 5ELISA detection of anti-P. insidiosum IgG1 in challenged mice. The figure depicts the anti-P. insidiosum IgG1 levels in sera collected seven days after the end of the immunization protocol in mice PiV immunized and then challenged with the L. major (●) and mice in the control group challenged only with L. major (■). As expected, anti-P. insidiosum IgG1 was found only in PiV immunized mice.