Literature DB >> 28393029

Comparison of visual and topographic outcomes of deep-anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.

Bora Yüksel1, Baran Kandemir2, Umut Duygu Uzunel1, Ozan Çelik1, Sezgin Ceylan2, Tuncay Küsbeci1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare visual, surgical and topographic outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus (KC).
METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial 76 eyes of 71 KC patients operated between January 2011 and July 2014 in 2 tertiary referral hospitals were included. Consecutive patients were alternately selected to receive one of the two surgical methods. Thirty eight eyes underwent DALK with the big-bubble technique and 38 eyes underwent PK.
RESULTS: Mean best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at the first postoperative week (P=0.012) and the first postoperative month (P<0.001) was statistically significantly higher in DALK group. The mean BSCVA at 12mo was not significantly different for DALK (0.30±1.99 logMAR) versus PK (0.40±0.33 logMAR) (P=0.104). The 76.3% of the eyes had a BSCVA over 0.5 in DALK and 47.4% in PK group (P=0.009). The 7.9% of the eyes had a BSCVA of 1.0 in DALK and 5.3% in PK group (P=0.644). Mean spherical equivalent was -2.94 D in DALK and -3.09 D in PK group. Mean topographic astigmatism was 4.62 D and 4.18 D respectively. Regular topographic patterns were observed in 31 (81.6%) of DALK and 29 (76.3%) of PK (P=0.574). The most frequent topographic pattern was oblate asymmetric bow tie, seen in 39.5% in DALK and 23.7% in PK.
CONCLUSION: Big bubble DALK provides an earlier visual improvement compare to PK. However, visual and topographic outcomes are similar to those in PK at 1y. Postoperative complications including rejection and intraocular pressure elevation are more frequent in PK. DALK is a safer alternative to PK for KC. However, intraoperative perforation of the Descemet's membrane is a significant complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; keratoconus; penetrating keratoplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 28393029      PMCID: PMC5360773          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.03.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  27 in total

1.  Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vincent M Borderie; Otman Sandali; Julien Bullet; Thomas Gaujoux; Olivier Touzeau; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Factors influencing big-bubble formation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Seyed-Hashem Daryabari
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Australian keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Ross MacIntyre; Sing-Pey Chow; Elsie Chan; Alexander Poon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 4.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the american academy of ophthalmology.

Authors:  William J Reinhart; David C Musch; Deborah S Jacobs; W Barry Lee; Stephen C Kaufman; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: comparison of optical and visual quality outcomes.

Authors:  Esin Söğütlü Sari; Anil Kubaloğlu; Mustafa Ünal; David Piñero Llorens; Arif Koytak; Ali Nihat Ofluoglu; Yusuf Özertürk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Influence of graft-host interface on the quality of vision after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Gabriella Parente; Antonia Sincich; Giorgio Tassinari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammed Anwar; Klaus D Teichmann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Corneal transplant surgery for keratoconus and the effect of surgeon experience on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Shivani A Kasbekar; Mark N A Jones; Sajjad Ahmad; Daniel F P Larkin; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Long-term comparison of full-bed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating keratoconus.

Authors:  Yong-ming Zhang; Shuang-qing Wu; Yu-feng Yao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Authors:  Yueqin Chen; Dan-Ning Hu; Yuan Xia; Liping Yang; Chunyan Xue; Zhenping Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and anterior lamellar keratoplasty during 2010-2017.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Sun; Hua-Lei Zhai; Jun Cheng; Qian-Qian Kong; Lin Cong; Lin Li; Wen-Pei Hao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Updates on Managements for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Zahra Heidari; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-06

Review 3.  Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Majid Shams; Ali Sharifi; Zahra Akbari; Ali Maghsoudlou; Mohammad Reza Tajali
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 4.  Graft survival rate of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng Guan; Weijia Zhao; Yang Zhang; Yu Geng; Zonghan Chen; Liuyan Feng; Dongli Li; Ling Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.