| Literature DB >> 28393013 |
G Olivito1, M Cercignani2, M Lupo3, C Iacobacci4, S Clausi4, S Romano5, M Masciullo6, M Molinari7, M Bozzali8, M Leggio4.
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease characterized by a progressive cerebellar syndrome, which can be isolated or associated with extracerebellar signs. It has been shown that patients affected by SCA2 present also cognitive impairments and psychiatric symptoms. The cerebellum is known to modulate cortical activity and to contribute to distinct functional networks related to higher-level functions beyond motor control. It is therefore conceivable that one or more networks, rather than isolated regions, may be dysfunctional in cerebellar degenerative diseases and that an abnormal connectivity within specific cerebello-cortical regions might explain the widespread deficits typically observed in patients. In the present study, the network-based statistics (NBS) approach was used to assess differences in functional connectivity between specific cerebellar and cerebral "nodes" in SCA2 patients. Altered inter-nodal connectivity was found between more posterior regions in the cerebellum and regions in the cerebral cortex clearly related to cognition and emotion. Furthermore, more anterior cerebellar lobules showed altered inter-nodal connectivity with motor and somatosensory cerebral regions. The present data suggest that in SCA2 a cerebellar dysfunction affects long-distance cerebral regions and that the clinical symptoms may be specifically related with connectivity changes between motor and non-motor cerebello-cortical nodes.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebellum; Cerebral cortex; Functional connectivity; Nodes; Resting-state fMRI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28393013 PMCID: PMC5377430 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
| Case code | Age | Gender | Years of illness | CAG repeats | ICARS total scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA-1 | 42 | F | 1 | 22/39 | 47 |
| CA-2 | 54 | F | 1 | 22/37 | 27 |
| CA-3 | 65 | M | 3 | 22/35 | 27 |
| CA-4 | 42 | M | 1 | 14/47 | 24 |
| CA-5 | 42 | F | 1 | 22/39 | 28 |
| CA-6 | 36 | F | 8 | 22/42 | 37 |
| CA-7 | 62 | F | 4 | 22/37 | 31 |
| CA-8 | 41 | M | 3 | 22/38 | 18 |
| CA-9 | 44 | F | 13 | – | 28 |
ICARS = International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale.
Patients' neuropsychological assessment.
| Patients | Tests | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | DR | PM | WF | fREY | FDS | BDS | FC | BC | WISC | NamOb (err) | ||
| PErr | TErr | |||||||||||
| CA1 | 45.8 | 10.1 | 28.5 | 33.5 | 33.5 | 5.61 | 4.58 | 3.60 | – | 119 | 108 | 4 |
| CA2 | 46.5 | 10.1 | 29.0 | 19.2 | 26.5 | 5.77 | 2.66 | 4.73 | 4.01 | 108 | 108 | 5 |
| CA3 | 48.7 | 12.5 | 31.0 | 35.2 | 31.5 | 5.60 | 3.50 | 5.57 | 3.77 | 100 | 100 | 3 |
| CA4 | 46.5 | 11.7 | 33.5 | 24.7 | 34.7 | 5.82 | 4.90 | 6.86 | 5.58 | 100 | 100 | 4 |
| CA5 | – | – | 26.0 | 32.2 | 4.47 | 4.43 | 3.58 | – | ||||
| CA6 | 45.5 | 8.6 | 30.0 | 23.1 | 30.5 | 5.55 | 3.52 | 3.54 | 3.50 | 138 | 119 | 2 |
| CA7 | 47.3 | 9.7 | 33.0 | 25.5 | 30.0 | 3.19 | 6.15 | 6.01 | 108 | 92 | 1 | |
| CA8 | 42.5 | 13.7 | 35.0 | 19.7 | 32.7 | 4.82 | 2.90 | 5.86 | 4.58 | 119 | 108 | 1 |
| CA9 | 44.8 | 10.1 | 27.5 | 36.5 | 27.5 | 5.61 | 4.58 | 4.60 | 4.58 | 119 | 119 | 0 |
| Cut-off | 28.53 | 4.69 | 18.96 | 17.35 | 23.76 | 4.26 | 2.65 | 3.46 | 3.17 | 92 | 92 | ± 2 |
Cut-off values refer to published normative data. Scores below the cut-off are marked in bold.
IR: Rey's 15 mots short term (immediate recall); DR: Rey's 15 mots long term (delayed recall); PM: progressive matrices; WF: word fluency; fREY: Complex Rey's Figure-copy; FDS: forward digit span; BDS: backward digit span; FC: forward Corsi; BC: backwords Corsi; WISC: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: PErr (perseverative errors), TErr: total errors; NamOb(err): naming objects (errors).
Fig. 1a) Network of significantly decreased functional connectivity in SCA2 patients as assessed by NBS analysis (FWE = 0.05). The regions of the cerebello-cortical (red) and cortico-cortical (blue) modules are shown in different colors. Bigger nodes correspond to cerebellar and cortical regions relevant to cognition and emotion; smaller nodes correspond to cerebellar and cortical regions relevant to motor control. The brain network is visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/) (Xia et al., 2013). b) Anatomical representations of cognitive (violet) and motor (green) nodes in the cerebellum and cerebral cortex showing underconnectivity between each other. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Cerebello-cerebral nodes of functional underconnectivity.
| Pairwise brain regions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebellum | Cerebral cortex | ||
| Posterior | R-Crus I | L-temporal inferior | 3.84 |
| L-frontal medial | 4.05 | ||
| L-Crus I | R-frontal superior | 4.38 | |
| R-frontal medial | 5.24 | ||
| L-Crus II | R-frontal superior | 3.93 | |
| R-Frontal medial | 4.24 | ||
| R-CrusII | L-frontal superior | 4.54 | |
| L-frontal medial | 5.38 | ||
| L-temporal inferior | 3.95 | ||
| R-VIIb | L-frontal medial | 5.22 | |
| R-frontal medial | 3.18 | ||
| Intermediate | L-VI | R-supplementary motor | 4.23 |
| L-supplementary motor | 4.29 | ||
| R-cingulum | 3.62 | ||
| L-cingulum | 3.64 | ||
| R-supramarginal | 4.51 | ||
| R-VI | L-supplementary motor | 3.89 | |
| R-supplementary motor | 3.43 | ||
| Anterior | L-III | R-frontal inferior operculum | 3.35 |
| L-frontal inferior operculum | 4.93 | ||
| R-III | L-frontal inferior operculum | 3.61 | |
| L-rolandic operculum | 3.95 | ||
| R-rolandic operculum | 3.43 | ||
| R-IV/V | L-postcentral gyrus | 3.60 | |
| VERMIS | I–II | L-frontal inferior operculum | 3.96 |
| III | L-frontal inferior operculum | 4.86 | |
| R-frontal inferior operculum | 3.57 | ||
| L-frontal inferior,pars triangularis | 4.17 | ||
| R-rolandic operculum | 3.83 | ||
| L-postcentral gyrus | 3.85 | ||
| IV–V | L-precentral gyrus | 4.97 | |
| R-precentral gyrus | 4.79 | ||
| L-frontal inferior operculum | 4.32 | ||
| L-rolandic operculum | 3.42 | ||
| R-rolandic operculum | 4.00 | ||
| L-supplementary motor | 4.09 | ||
| R-supplementary motor | 3.99 | ||
| L-postcentral gyrus | 5.37 | ||
| R-postcentral gyrus | 4.64 | ||
| VI | L-frontal inferior operculum | 3.96 | |
| L-rolandic operculum | 3.69 | ||
| R-rolandic operculum | 3.82 | ||
| R-supramarginal | 3.55 | ||
Difference of functional connectivity into pairwise brain regions in patients with SCA2 compared to controls (p-value < 0.05 in the whole-network comparison using Network Based statistics). R = right; L = left.
t-Values are reported.