Literature DB >> 28392967

Gendered Social Learning, Nonfamily Institutions, and Attitudes About Recourse After Partner Violence.

Kathryn M Yount1, Kathleen H Krause2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide the first study in Vietnam of how gendered social learning about violence and exposure to non-family institutions influence women's attitudes about a wife's recourse after physical IPV.
METHOD: A probability sample of 532 married women, ages 18-50 years, was surveyed in July-August, 2012 in Mỹ Hào district. We fit a multivariate linear regression model to estimate correlates of favoring recourse in six situations using a validated attitudinal scale. We split attitudes towards recourse into three subscales (disfavor silence, favor informal recourse, favor formal recourse) and fit one multivariate ordinal logistic regression model for each behavior to estimate correlates of favoring recourse.
RESULTS: On average, women favored recourse in 2.8 situations. Women who were older and had witnessed physical IPV in childhood had less favorable attitudes about recourse. Women who were hit as children, had completed more schooling, worked outside agriculture, and had sought recourse after IPV had more favorable attitudes about recourse.
CONCLUSIONS: Normative change among women may require efforts to curb family violence, counsel those exposed to violence in childhood, and enhance women's opportunities for higher schooling and non-agricultural wage work. The state and organizations working on IPV might overcome pockets of unfavorable public opinion by enforcing accountability for IPV rather than seeking to alter ideas about recourse among women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vietnam; domestic violence; gender norms; intimate partner violence; recourse seeking

Year:  2016        PMID: 28392967      PMCID: PMC5382792          DOI: 10.1037/vio0000029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Violence        ISSN: 2152-081X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Unhealthy parenting and potential mediators as contributing factors to future intimate violence: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan P Schwartz; Sally M Hage; Imelda Bush; Lauren Key Burns
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2006-07

2.  Development of the scale of economic abuse.

Authors:  Adrienne E Adams; Cris M Sullivan; Deborah Bybee; Megan R Greeson
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2008-05

3.  Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.

Authors:  K M Devries; J Y T Mak; C García-Moreno; M Petzold; J C Child; G Falder; S Lim; L J Bacchus; R E Engell; L Rosenfeld; C Pallitto; T Vos; N Abrahams; C H Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The harmony of family and the silence of women: sexual attitudes and practices among rural married women in northern Viet Nam.

Authors:  Vu Song Ha
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2008-06

5.  Social and economic change, intergenerational relationships, and family formation in Taiwan.

Authors:  A Thornton; M C Chang; T H Sun
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1984-11

6.  Prevalence of and risk factors for violent disciplinary practices at home in Viet Nam.

Authors:  Claudia Cappa; Hang Dam
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2013-10-24

7.  Rape disclosure: the interplay of gender, culture and kinship in contemporary Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Thu Huong
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2012-05-16

8.  Dimensions of gender relations and reproductive health inequity perceived by female undergraduate students in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Thanh Cong Bui; Christine M Markham; Michael W Ross; Mark L Williams; R Palmer Beasley; Ly T H Tran; Huong T H Nguyen; Thach Ngoc Le
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-10-24

9.  Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam--different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence: need for new intervention guidelines?

Authors:  Dang Vung Nguyen; Per-Olof Ostergren; Gunilla Krantz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.