Literature DB >> 28392784

Structure and Function of the Fecal Microbiota in Diarrheic Neonatal Piglets.

Qiaoli Yang1, Xiaoyu Huang1, Shengguo Zhao1, Wenyang Sun1, Zunqiang Yan1, Pengfei Wang1, Shenggui Li1, Wangzhou Huang1, Shengwei Zhang1, Lixia Liu2, Shuangbao Gun3.   

Abstract

Diarrhea is a leading cause of increased mortality in neonatal and young piglets. Aberration of the gut microbiota is one important factor in the etiology of piglet diarrhea. However, information regarding the structure and function of the gut microbiome in diarrheic neonatal piglets is limited. To investigate the composition and functional potential of the fecal microbiota in neonatal piglets, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on 20 fecal samples from diarrheic piglets and healthy controls, and metagenomics sequencing on a subset of six samples. We found striking compositional and functional differences in fecal microbiota between diarrheic and healthy piglets. Neonatal piglet diarrhea was associated with increases in the relative abundance of Prevotella, Sutterella, and Campylobacter, as well as Fusobacteriaceae. The increased relative abundance of Prevotella was correlated with the reduction in Escherichia coli and the majority of beneficial bacteria that belonging to the Firmicutes phylum (e.g., Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, and Blautia) in diarrheic piglets. The differentially functional gene abundances in diarrheic piglets were an increase in bacterial ribosome, and contributed primarily by the genera Prevotella, this indicates a growth advantage of the Prevotella in diarrheic conditions. Additional functional gene sets were associated with the reduction of polyamine transport, monosaccharide and sugar-specific PTS transport, amino acid transport, and two-component regulatory system. These profiles likely impact the ability to transport and uptake nutrients, as well as the ability to fight microbial infections in the piglet gut ecosystem. This work identifies a potential role for Prevotella in the community-wide microbial aberration and dysfunction that underpins the pathogenesis of piglet diarrhea. Identification of these microbial and functional signatures may provide biomarkers of neonatal piglet diarrhea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; diarrhea; fecal microbiota; functional genes; metagenomics; neonatal piglets

Year:  2017        PMID: 28392784      PMCID: PMC5364137          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The gastrointestinal microbiota of newborn animals has a profound influence on the host’s health through regulating the intestinal nutritional metabolism, maturation of the immune system, and establishment of the gut barrier (Krajmalnik-Brown et al., 2012; Kabat et al., 2014). Aberration in the structure and function of gut microbiota, termed microbial dysbiosis, is an important factor that impacts several inflammatory intestinal disorders [e.g., acute necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and diarrhea], either associated with the presence of specific pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile, and Brachyspira) (Costa et al., 2014; Minamoto et al., 2014a; Ward et al., 2016; William et al., 2016) or a non-specific dysbiosis (Azcarate-Peril et al., 2011; Pop et al., 2014). Diarrhea is a leading cause of increased mortality in neonatal and young piglets. Almost half (49%) of piglet deaths are the result of diarrheal infections (Morris et al., 2002). Genetic predisposition and environment factors (i.e., microbial pathogens, nutrition) contribute to the development of this disease. The increased research over the past few decades has advanced our understanding the specific microbial pathogens responsible for triggering piglet diarrhea (Krause et al., 2010; Larsson et al., 2014). Recently, an increased number of neonatal diarrhea cases in the swine industry were found to be associated with additional pathogens (Kongsted et al., 2014; Larsson et al., 2015), making the management of diarrhea even harder. The gut microbiota has been viewed as a contributing factor in the etiology of piglet diarrhea (Hermann-Bank et al., 2015). The gut microbes provide defense against pathogenic invaders by affecting the metabolic state and immune response of the host. When diarrhea develops, the colonization of intestinal pathogenic microorganisms is markedly increased prior to disruption of the intestinal microbial composition and consequently their beneficial functions (Ward et al., 2016). It has been suggested that analyses of the intestinal microbiome may lead to early diagnosis and prevention of intestinal diseases (Li et al., 2012; Raes, 2016). Identification of the gut microbial composition and molecular function that may be involved in the pathogenesis of neonatal piglet diarrhea may provide a new prevention strategy to control this disease. Pérez-Cobas et al. (2013) suggested that short chain fatty acids producing bacteria from the order Clostridiales and corresponding functional genes in aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, tryptophan metabolism, and polyamine biosynthesis were associated with C. difficile colonization resistance. In human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), an imbalance in the abundances of the Firmicutes and Enterobacteriaceae groups is reported to be corresponded with changes in oxidative stress, carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid biosynthesis (Morgan et al., 2012). Another study exploring the early intestinal microbiome of infants showed that the genes involving in iron acquisition, phosphotransferase systems (PTS), and D-serine metabolism from E. coli were associated with NEC (Ward et al., 2016). Together, these findings suggest that the pivotal microbial components form a core of microbial function and the difference of the pivotal microbiota is closely related to different pathophysiologic states. For suckling piglets, an unstable gut microbial environment and immature immune system make them particularly susceptible to the pathogens, and this increases the risk of diarrhea infection in this stage of life (Bauer et al., 2006). Investigation into the diversity and composition of the gut bacteria in nursing piglets is considerably limited and has mainly focused on longitudinal comparisons on distinct ages or dietary changes around weaning (Thompson et al., 2008; Frese et al., 2015; Slifierz et al., 2015). Frese et al. (2015) studied the fecal microbiome of piglets from birth to weaning and showed that dietary glycans influenced the microbial composition and function. Aberration of the gut microbiota has been identified in neonatal porcine diarrhea and acute necrotizing enterocolitis (Azcarate-Peril et al., 2011; Hermann-Bank et al., 2015). Azcarate-Peril et al. (2011) reported that Clostridium spp., Actinobacteria, and Cyanobacteria were significantly enriched in preterm piglets with NEC. Hermann-Bank et al. (2015) demonstrated that neonatal diarrheic piglets had decreased Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, as well as increased Enterococcus and E. coli compared with healthy piglets. However, to the best of our knowledge, the response of functional characteristics to the perturbation of microbiota in piglet diarrhea remains unclear. In this study, we examined the microbial composition and function of fecal samples from 20 diarrheic and healthy neonatal Large White piglets using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and followed by metagenomic sequencing of a subset of the samples. Our results indicate striking differences in microbial abundance and function between diarrheic and healthy neonatal piglets. Functional genes involved in bacterial ribosome, polyamine transport, monosaccharide and sugar-specific PTS transport, amino acid transport, and two-component regulatory system were associated with neonatal piglet diarrhea.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Sample Collection

Piglets were the progeny of six healthy Large White sows that were maintained under identical husbandry practices and epidemic prevention systems in a commercial farm in the Gansu province of China. The farm had no previous history of bacterial and viral infections. Upon delivery, the litters (each litter with 7–11 piglets) were routinely dosed with 2 mg gentamycin sulfate (80,000 IU) to protect against bacterial infection. All piglets were exclusively breast-fed, and were given ad libitum access to water. Ear notching was used for individual identification. The general health of each piglet was closely monitored during the first 10 days after birth, and special attention was paid to fecal consistency and disease history. According to these observations, a diarrheic or a healthy piglet was defined based on the criteria described by Hermann-Bank et al. (2015). Briefly, diarrheic piglets were characterized as those suffering from diarrhea for at least two consecutive days with liquid and watery feces that had not received antibiotic therapy prior to sample collection; meanwhile, healthy piglets were those that had never experienced diarrhea and other diseases. For piglets at seven to 10 days of ages meeting the above conditions, feces were collected using a sterile cotton swab or a slight extrude and immediately frozen on liquid nitrogen. Finally, 20 fecal samples (10 diarrheic and 10 healthy) among those collected samples were further chosen for this study; healthy samples were selected from the litters with diarrheic piglets. All animal experimental protocols were conducted according to the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals established by the Ministry of Agriculture of China. The project was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Gansu Research Center for Swine Production Engineering and Technology.

16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene was performed to characterize microbial diversity and community composition. Briefly, bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from fecal samples using TIANamp stool DNA kit (TIANGEN, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of sample was estimated by a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer and agarose gel electrophoresis. The extracted DNA was used as a template for PCR using barcoded primers that flanked the V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene; the primer sequences were 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 according to the manufacturer’s instruction for 2 × 250 bp paired-end reads. The raw sequencing reads were merged using FLASH (v1.2.7), and quality filtering of reads was performed using QIIME pipeline (Caporaso et al., 2010). The acquired sequences were chimera filtered (Haas et al., 2011) using UCHIME algorithm (Edgar et al., 2011) by aligning to the gold database[1]. All 16S rRNA gene sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI short-read archive under BioProject number of PRJNA340296 (Supplementary Table S1). The high-quality reads were picked into distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using Uparse pipeline (v7.0.1001) with a 97% similarity threshold (Edgar, 2013). They were then taxonomically classified to different levels (phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species) by comparing sequences to the GreenGene database (Desantis et al., 2006) using RDP 3 classifier algorithm (V2.2) (Wang et al., 2007). Species richness (i.e., Observed species), alpha diversity measurement (i.e., Shannon index), and weighted UniFrac distance were calculated using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) (Werner et al., 2012). The dissimilarity matrices of OTUs were visualized using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots with a conventional cut-off of <0.2 for the stress value. The statistical differences in alpha and beta diversity of bacterial communities between the two groups were detected using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) test was used to determine significant difference of microbial communities between diarrheic and healthy groups. Differentially abundant bacterial taxa between the two groups were detect by metastats analysis (White et al., 2009), and only taxa with mean relative abundance > 0.1% in at least one group were considered. p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons with Benjamini and Hochberg false-discovery rate correction (q-value) (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Significance was considered at p < 0.05 and q < 0.05.

Construction of Co-occurrence Networks

Co-occurrence networks can capture the extreme exclusion relationships amongst key microbial taxa. Abundance-based marker genera from 16S rRNA gene sequencing were used to calculate Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) for each group using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., 2009). The p-value was obtained using an empirical null distribution using 1,000 permutations. Taxa with r above 0.5 or less than – 0.5 were used to construct the correlation networks in Gephi (Jacomy et al., 2009), irrespective of statistical threshold.

Metagenomic Sequencing

Metagenomic sequencing was performed on a subset of six samples randomly (three diarrheic and three healthy) to investigate the fecal microbial function in neonatal piglets. Sequence libraries were constructed following the manufacturer’s instruction (Illumina, USA). Automated cluster generation was conducted using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 following the 2 × 100 bp paired-end protocol. Raw pair-end reads were first filtered with WindowMasker (Morgulis et al., 2006) to remove low-quality reads (i.e., having > 40% of bases with a quality < Q20 or having > 10 N bases). The host contaminating reads were then removed by aligning clean reads to the swine genome sequences deposited in the NCBI Nucleotide Database (Groenen et al., 2012). On average, 6.29 Gb paired-end reads of high-quality sequences per sample were generated. The metagenomic datasets were deposited to EMBL-ENA’s Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject number PRJEB15296 (Supplementary Table S1). Clean reads were assembled into contigs for each of the samples using the SOAP de novo assembler (v1.06) with the k-mer values of 49, 55, and 59 (Li et al., 2010). The assembly with the largest scaffold N50 was selected. Then the scaffolds were broken at N joints to obtain the scaftigs that did not contain N sequences (Qin et al., 2012). For each sample, the clean data were mapped to scaftigs using SoapAligner (v2.21) with parameters ‘-u, -2, -m 200’ (Li et al., 2009), then the unused reads were binned and repeatedly assembled with the same parameters of the single sample assembly but only one k-mer value, -K 55. Finally, scaftigs with lengths less than 500 bp from single sample and mixed assembly were discarded. A gene catalog was constructed from the assembled scaftigs using MetaGeneMark (Qin et al., 2012). The six samples contained a total of 759,096 ORFs. The gene relative abundance was calculated and renormalized to one according to Qin et al. (2012). Taxonomic assignment of the unigenes was performed using DIAMOND according to the MicroNR database (Version: 2014-10-19) (Buchfink et al., 2015). The relative abundance of a taxon was calculated from the relative abundance of its genes.

Gene Functional Classification and Ortholog Group Abundance

Protein sequences of the non-redundant genes (432,981) were queried against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (v.67.0) (Kanehisa et al., 2014) using NCBI blastP (e-value ≤ 1e-5). Genes that had alignments with a minimum bit score 60 were assigned into one or more KEGG orthologous (KO). The corresponding tables from gene to KO and from KO to modules were used to build functional modules. The relative abundance of KOs and KEGG modules was calculated by summing the abundance of those genes that annotated to each functional subsystem. We used the ade4 package in R to construct principal component analysis (PCA) based on the abundance of KO profiles. The comparisons of taxonomic composition and functional profiles (i.e., KOs and KEGG modules) between diarrheic and healthy piglets were performed using metastats with Benjamini and Hochberg correction (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995; White et al., 2009). Significance was considered at p < 0.05 and q < 0.1. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis was further performed to reveal the significant ranking of abundant modules in diarrheic and healthy samples (Segata et al., 2011). A size-effect threshold of 2.0 on the logarithmic LDA score was used for discriminative functional markers. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to assess pivotal functional associations with the bacterial taxa, irrespective of statistical threshold.

Results

16S rRNA Gene Profiles in Diarrheic and Healthy Piglets

We sequenced the V4 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA gene to identify the fecal bacterial community diversity and composition in diarrheic and healthy piglets. A total of 1,123,687 high-quality sequences were acquired from 10 diarrheic samples and 10 healthy samples (Supplementary Table S1). The sequences were assigned to 14,386 OTUs based on 97% species similarity; these OTUs mapped to 18 phyla, 30 classes, 53 orders, 77 families and 128 genera. The top 10 phyla and the top 10 genera in relative abundance of the fecal bacteria that present in diarrheic and healthy piglets were displayed in Figure . Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the most prevalent phyla in both diarrheic and healthy piglets, followed by Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria (Figure ). These accounted for 98.04 and 97.23% of the reads for healthy and diarrheic piglets, respectively. Other phyla included Cyanobacteria, Synergistetes, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes, Spirochaetes, and Euryarchaeota; only 0.79 and 1.57% of sequences were unclassified at the phylum level for healthy and diarrheic piglets, respectively. At the genus level, Bacteroides was the most dominant in both groups, other major genera included Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, Clostridium (member of Clostridiaceae), Oscillospira, Phascolarctobacterium, p-75-a5, and Clostridium (member of Lachnospiraceae); these genera accounted for more than 50% of total sequences (Figure ). Taxonomic profiles of the fecal bacteria in diarrheic and healthy piglets from 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relative abundance of the top 10 phylum (A) and the top 10 genus (B) of fecal bacteria present in both diarrheic and healthy piglets. The diarrheic sample and healthy sample is abbreviated as D and H, respectively.

Differences of Community Diversity and Bacterial Composition between Diarrheic and Healthy Piglets

Alpha diversity measures of the fecal bacterial community showed negligible differences between diarrheic and healthy piglets (i.e., Diarrhea vs. Healthy: 6.05 ± 0.16 vs. 6.21 ± 0.20 and 642.30 ± 16.90 vs. 617.20 ± 23.80 for shannon index and species richness, respectively, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p > 0.05), while beta diversity, the variability of OTU community structure between samples, was higher for diarrheic piglets than for healthy controls (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.01; Figure ). Similarly, the NMDS plot showing the dissimilarity of microbial community also revealed distinct structure between diarrheic and healthy piglets (Figure ), and the ANOSIM for differences between the two groups was significant (R = 0.8536, p = 0.001); this observation was supported by unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) analysis based on the weighted UniFrac distances (Figure ). Comparison of fecal microbial community structure between diarrheic and healthy piglets. (A) Beta diversity (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.01), (B) NMDS plot (ANOSIM R = 0.8536, p = 0.001) and (C) UPGMA tree, all revealing significant differences between diarrheic and healthy piglets based on the weighted UniFrac distances of OTU community. The diarrheic sample and healthy sample is abbreviated as D and H, respectively. Significant differences in the major taxonomical profiles (mean relative abundance > 0.1%) of fecal microbiota between diarrheic and healthy piglets was further identified using metastats analysis (Figure and Supplementary Table S2). The relative abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes and the genera Prevotella and [Prevotella] were significantly elevated in piglets suffering from diarrhea. The relative abundance of the phylum Fusobacteria (and the family Fusobacteriaceae) in diarrheic piglets was over 4 times (log2 fold changes) higher than that in healthy piglets. In contrast, there was a significant decrease in the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in diarrheic piglets. Within the Firmicutes phyla, eight genera (Clostridium, [Ruminococcus], Blautia, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Eubacterium, and Sharpea) exhibited decreased relative abundance. One genus, Collinsella (an Actinobacteria), had decreased relative abundance in piglets suffering from diarrhea. Sutterella and Campylobacter (members of the Proteobacteria phylum) exhibited increased relative abundances in diarrheic piglets, however, overall there was a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in diarrheic piglets due to the decrease of Escherichia and Proteus. In addition to the phylum and genus, there were significant differences between the diarrheic and healthy groups in nine classes, eight orders and 13 families (mean relative abundance > 0.1%, q < 0.05), see in Supplementary Table S2. Comparison of the fecal microbial community of healthy and diarrheic neonatal piglets. The bacterial phyla (A) and genera (B) differed between the diarrheic and healthy piglets. The diarrheic and healthy group is abbreviated as D and H, respectively. Bacterial taxa with mean relative abundance greater than 0.1% in at least one group are included. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance is considered at p < 0.05 and q < 0.05. When comparing the taxonomical profiles at the OTU level, 13 OTUs that can be assigned to species showed significant difference in relative abundance between diarrheic and healthy piglets (mean relative abundance > 0.1%, q < 0.05; Table ). OTU19 (Prevotella stercorea) and OTU25 (Bacteroides caccae) were more abundant in diarrheic piglets, whereas OTU1 (Escherichia coli), OTU116 (Enterococcus cecorum), OTU10 (Lactobacillus delbrueckii), OTU79 (Streptococcus luteciae), OTU135 (Collinsella aerofacie), OTU77 and OTU106 (Ruminococcus gnavus), OTU70 (Eubacterium biforme), OTU170 (Sharpea azabuensis), OTU56 (Clostridium hathewayi), and OTU91 (Clostridium perfringens) were more abundant in healthy piglets. Significant differences in relative abundance of OTUs at species level between diarrheic and healthy piglets.

Microbial Co-occurrence Networks amongst Marker Genera

The co-occurrence networks from the 15 marker genera were constructed for the diarrheic and healthy piglets, based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r), separately (Figure and Supplementary Table S3). Co-occurrence networks of bacterial genera constructed on the healthy and diarrheic piglets. Co-occurrence networks were deduced from 15 marker genera that were identified from 16S rRNA sequencing. Each node represents a genus, the size of each node is proportional to the relative abundance; the color of the nodes indicates their taxonomic assignment. Connection of paired nodes represent Spearman correlation coefficient (red) above 0.5 or below 0.5 (cyan), the thickness of each connection is proportional to the r-value. In general, there tended to be negative correlations between obligate anaerobes and facultative anaerobes in healthy samples; however, in diarrheic piglets these correlations were either reduced in extent, or became positive. The most obvious example is the negative correlation between the Prevotella with the genera Escherichia, Streptococcus, and Proteus in healthy piglets (r < -0.6, p < 0.05). In diarrhea piglets, the genus Prevotella was positively correlated with Campylobacter (r > 0.6, p < 0.01). The protective genus Lactobacillus was negatively correlated with most of obligate anaerobes in healthy piglets, but was positively correlated with Prevotella and [Ruminococcus] in diarrheic piglets (r > 0.6, p < 0.05). These transitions will probably enable pathogenic microorganisms to thrive under diarrheic conditions. Of a number of obligate anaerobes that were positively correlated with each other in healthy piglets (r > 0.6, p < 0.05), some of them, such as Clostridium, [Ruminococcus], Blautia, and Collinsella, exhibited reduced magnitude or negative correlations in diarrheic piglets (r < -0.6, p < 0.05). The transition from a positive to negative correlation may indicate competition for oxygen or diversifying selection. Interestingly, Collinsella (a member of the phylum Actinobacteria) was positively correlated with [Ruminococcus], Blautia and Eubacterium in both groups (r > 0.6, p < 0.05). This suggests the phylogenetic or functional similarity between the genera. Thus, as the co-occurrence patterns of bacterial communities appear to equate the diversity of intestinal microflora and the health of microenvironment, the gut environment of diarrheic piglets becomes permissive for the development and maintenance of the related taxa in individuals.

Microbial Functional Characteristics from the Metagenomic Profiles

We utilized metagenome sequencing on a subset samples to determine the microbial gene functions between healthy and diarrheic piglets. Taxonomic profiles of the fecal microbiota in diarrheic and healthy piglets are displayed in Supplementary Figures . The most prevalent phyla and genera in diarrheic and healthy piglets were similar to that in 16S rRNA gene sequencing, while their relative abundances differed (Supplementary Figures ). We queried the non-redundant genes against the KEGG databases (Kanehisa et al., 2014) using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1990), a total of 4,673 KOs were identified in six piglet fecal samples, which covered 35.27% of the updated gene catalog in the KEGG clustering-based subsystem. The profiles revealed that metabolism for carbohydrate, amino acid, nucleotide, energy and cofactors and vitamins were dominant in both diarrheic and healthy piglets, followed by translation and membrane transport (Supplementary Figure ). Based on the normalized read abundances of KOs, samples were clustered distinctly between diarrheic and healthy piglets by PCA, and 79.53% variation was explained in the first principle component (Supplementary Figure ). At significant threshold of q < 0.1, 304 KOs were showed significantly different enrichments in diarrheic and healthy piglets (Supplementary Table S4), and more than half of them were not assigned to the functional pathways/modules or unknown function proteins. An investigation of the KOs involved in the functional module levels (i.e., small sets of genes in well-defined metabolic pathways), 397 KEGG modules were detected among all profiles. We compared the modules that covered more than 40% of KOs in the metagenome, there were 52 of these modules were differed in relative abundance between diarrheic and healthy piglets (Supplementary Table S5). LEfSe analysis was performed to reveal the significant ranking of abundant modules (Figure ), and a notable difference was the enrichment of genes involved in ribosome biogenesis; this was accompanied by an increase in the relative abundance of makers for adenine ribonucleotide biosynthesis, tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis, and nucleotide sugar biosynthesis, as well as a decrease in the relative abundance of purine degradation (Figure ). The enriched level of genes in bacterial ribosome was positively correlated with the high relative abundance of Prevotella and Fusobacterium (Table ). Furthermore, numerous proteins and enzymes that were involved in ribosomal biogenesis but not annotated to the KEGG modules, such as ribosome recycling factor (K03530), ribonuclease III (K06942), GTP-binding protein (K02428), elongation factor Ts (K07030), adenine deaminase (K07095), and recombination protein RecA (K02078), were also enriched in diarrheic piglets (Supplementary Table S4). Association of KEGG modules in the microbial profiles with piglet diarrhea. Differentially abundant modules between diarrheic and healthy piglets were detected using metastats with Benjamini and Hochberg correction (p < 0.05 and q < 0.1), and LEfSe analysis was performed to reveal the significant ranking. Modules with a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score > 2.0 are plotted. Microbial function modules involved in metabolism of carbohydrate, nucleotide, amino acid and energy (A), and transport systems (B) are associated with piglet diarrhea. Distribution of metagenomic reads from pig fecal samples annotated to the ribosome module and Spearman’s correlation between ribosome module and genera. A majority of key metabolism functions exhibited different abundances in diarrheic and healthy piglets (Figure ). The crucial carbohydrate metabolism modules for pyruvate oxidation, the citrate cycle and the Entner–Doudoroff pathway, were reduced in diarrheic piglets. These were strongly connected to other important functions like energy metabolism. Polyamine, cofactor and vitamin biosynthesis exhibited different relative abundances in diarrheic and healthy piglets (Figure ). The relative abundance of polyamine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) biosynthesis, cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase, ubiquinone and menaquinone (vitamin K2) biosynthesis were decreased in diarrheic piglets. These findings support the notion that a decreased microbial protective ability in immune system maturation and inflammation regulation is associated with piglet diarrhea. The sugar-specific PTS and monosaccharides transport system for carbohydrate uptake were significantly altered in diarrheic piglets (Figure ). There was a decreased relative abundance of PTS transporter genes for mannose, β-glucoside, glucitol/sorbitol, lactose and galactitol, as well as monosaccharides (i.e., D-xylose and L-arabinose) transport genes in diarrheic piglets. Furthermore, the dipeptide transport system, one mechanism of protein absorption, was also decreased in diarrheic piglets. For the amino acid transport system, the gene relative abundances for fluoroquinolone, arginine, and L-cystine transport decreased; meanwhile, the gene relative abundances for putative lysine transport system and putative polar amino acid transport system increased. Additionally, the gene relative abundances for sulfate transport and iron/zinc/copper transport, which are linked to metal cation metabolism and vitamin B12 synthesis, were significantly decreased in diarrheic piglets. Finally, genes for two-component regulatory systems, type III secretion systems and the twin-arginine translocation system had decreased in relative abundance in diarrheic piglets (Figure ). The genes for type III secretion systems and QseBC two-component system were correlated with the decrease of Enterobacteriaceae; other two-component regulatory systems, such as KdpDE, LiaS-LiaR and GlnK-GlnL were more broadly distributed among the Firmicutes (Supplementary Table S6).

Discussion

Despite well documented evidence implicating gut microbiome in the etiology of diarrhea, the structure and function of the fecal microbiome in diarrheic neonatal piglets remains limited. To gain insight into the compositional and functional characteristics of diarrhea-associated microbiota, we comprehensively evaluate the fecal microbiota on fecal samples of neonatal piglets using 16S rRNA gene and metagenomics sequencing. The striking difference in the bacterial relative abundance and function between diarrheic and healthy piglets supports the notion that alterations in the interactions amongst gut microorganisms are associated with piglet diarrhea. This finding may help better understand the molecular functions of pivotal bacteria on the development of piglet diarrhea. One major difference in diarrheic piglets was the decreased relative abundance of Firmicutes members, including Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Clostridium, [Ruminococcus], and Blautia (Figure and Supplementary Table S2). Firmicutes are stable members of the normal gut microbiota in piglets (Slifierz et al., 2015), and several members of this phylum are believed to produce short-chain fatty acids and regulate systemic immune responses (Atarashi et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2015). Thus, they are likely involved in maintaining energy balance, inhibiting opportunistic pathogens, and protecting the host against excessive intestinal inflammation. For instance, Lactobacillus is a commonly used probiotic and is frequently detected in the fecal microbiota of pigs (Li et al., 2012). This bacterium protects against enteric pathogens, and competes with the gram-negatives Prevotella, Sutterella, and Campylobacter for mucosal binding sites (Mann et al., 2014). In this study, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were found at lower levels in diarrheic piglets, which are consistent with the previous studies (Costa et al., 2012; Hermann-Bank et al., 2015). These observations indicate that, under diarrheic conditions, the gut environment maintains the competition and abundance of different microbiota; and that the consistent reduction of these clades may thus affect the absorption of nutrients and the ant-inflammatory regulation of the host. While previous studies have shown that Enterococcus increases the risk of neonatal piglet diarrhea (Jonach et al., 2014; Hermann-Bank et al., 2015), the decrease of Enterococcus in this work may be due to the specific species of Enterococcus encountered. E. hirae and E. durans were found to co-occur with pathogenic E. coli in the preceding studies (Jonach et al., 2014; Larsson et al., 2014). However, E. faecalis and E. faecium were the dominant Enterococcus spp., as revealed by our metagenomic data (Healthy vs. Diarrhea: 2.95E-04 vs. 3.19E-05 and 1.54E-04 vs. 4.74E-05 for the relative abundance of E. faecalis and E. faecium, respectively). It has been suggested that E. faecium is capable of modulating barrier function of the porcine intestinal mucus (Bednorz et al., 2013; Klingspor et al., 2015). In weaned piglets, the dietary addition of E. faecalis LAB31 may increase the abundance of Lactobacillus and consequently reduce diarrhea (Hu et al., 2015). Thus, we believe that classification at the species level is more appropriate for identifying disease-associated bacteria because the genus level includes species that have varied effects on the host health. Alternatively, a concurrent relationship with other bacteria may also contribute to the decreased relative abundance of Enterococcus in this work. In fact, this study indicates that the presence of Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus were strongly and positively correlated with one other in diarrheic subjects (Figure ). Increased levels of Proteobacteria, including Sutterella and Campylobacter, were repeatedly reported in intestinal inflammatory disorders (Minamoto et al., 2014b). Although there was an overall decrease in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in diarrheic piglets due to the decrease of Escherichia and Proteus, the genera Sutterella and Campylobacter were observed with significantly increased relative abundance in diarrheic piglets, suggesting a pathogenic role in the development of piglet diarrhea. The increases of Sutterella and Campylobacter may be caused by decreased competition from Lactobacillus (Mann et al., 2014). E. coli is a major opportunistic pathogen that causes infection in NEC and diarrhea (Hermann-Bank et al., 2015; Ward et al., 2016). However, this bacterium was predominant and negatively correlated with Prevotella in healthy piglets (Figures , ). It appears that E. coli in this study is non-pathogenic. Prevotella is increasingly gaining attention not only because of its ability to degrade plant polysaccharides (Ivarsson et al., 2014), but also its proinflammatory property (Scher et al., 2013). This genus is present in nursing pigs with very low abundance and increases rapidly in weaned pigs when a plant-based diet is introduced (Alain et al., 2014; Frese et al., 2015). Intriguingly, we found that Prevotella was more dominant in diarrheic neonatal piglets. This is in line with the study that the Prevotella-dominated microbiome in inflammatory condition is a community shift away from Bacteroides and a large amount of beneficial microbes such as Group XIV Clostridia, Blautia, and Lachnospiraceae clades (Scher et al., 2013). Besides, several studies suggested a negative correlation between Prevotella and Escherichia. Kang et al. (2013) reported that the Prevotella cluster displayed a negatively correlated pattern with the Enterobacteriaceae cluster (e.g., Salmonella, Escherichia/Shigella, and Citrobacte) in healthy children. In contrast, Pop et al. (2014) revealed a negative correlation between Prevotella and Escherichia in young children with diarrhea. De et al. (2010) suggested that suppression of pathogenic Escherichia/Shigella by Prevotella might result in a lower incidence of gastrointestinal disorders in African children. We observed a strong negative correlation between Prevotella and several facultative anaerobic genera (e.g., Escherichia, Proteus, and Streptococcus) in healthy piglets; however, this correlation was disturbed in diarrheic condition (Figure and Supplementary Table S3). These observations suggest that the community-wide interrelationship of gut microbiota is altered in diseased subjects. The alteration in this study may confer a higher risk for trigger diarrhea and explain the changes in relative abundance of these microbes in diarrheic piglets. Fusobacterium is considered to be an inflammatory microorganism and a prognostic biomarker that inhibits T-cell responses and promotes the expression of inflammatory factors (Nosho et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2016). The increased relative abundance of Fusobacteriaceae in diarrheic piglets has also been reported in neonatal porcine diarrhea (Hermann-Bank et al., 2015) and horses with colitis (Costa et al., 2012). This suggests that Fusobacterium may be a contributing factor in the etiology of piglet diarrhea. Beyond microbial composition, the microbial functional profiles in diarrheic piglets also differed from those in healthy piglets. The fecal microbiome of diarrheic piglets enriched ribosome biogenesis genes, which were accompanied by increase in adenine ribonucleotide and nucleotide sugar biosynthesis, as well as decrease in purine degradation (Figure ). It is generally known that ribosome biogenesis is essential for bacterial cell viability. In this work, we observed that genes involved in bacterial ribosome were contributed primarily by Prevotella and Fusobacterium (Table ). This confirms the significantly increased relative abundance of Prevotella and Fusobacterium. A recent study on gene function prediction in E. coli has revealed new functions involving in cell adhesion, ribosomal protein biogenesis, and degradation (Vlasblom et al., 2015). Interactions between membrane protein genes and ribosome-dependent ATPase genes in E. coli have also been linked to oxidative phosphorylation and protein synthesis (Babu et al., 2011). One hypothesis is that ribosome biogenesis genes in Prevotella has similar functions to E. coli, and that these genes may be as an indicator of neonatal piglet diarrhea. Besides, ribosome biogenesis requires enormous amount of cellular energy, and thus may be tightly coupled with the process of oxidative phosphorylation. Metabolic functions may also play a role in the development of piglet diarrhea. There was a decreased abundance of functions for ubiquinone and menaquinone (vitamin K2) biosynthesis, polyamine biosynthesis, GABA biosynthesis and GABA shunt. Ubiquinone (coenzyme Q) is vital for cellular energy production, but also an electron carrier in the membrane-bound electron transport chain that protects cells against damage (Søballe and Poole, 2000). Polyamine has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects by the suppressing production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ (Haskó et al., 2000), the increase of polyamine biosynthesis was linked to the colonization resistance of C. difficile (Pérez-Cobas et al., 2013). Alternatively, microbial processing of putrescine can produce GABA which is thought to stimulate the release of glucagon-like peptide1 from intestinal cells to maintain energy homeostasis (Gameiro et al., 2005). Thus, these metabolites suggest a disturbed energy metabolism or a decreased protection against inflammatory and oxidative (or acid) stress in diarrheic piglets. It has been suggested that polyamine and GABA biosynthesis possibly correlated with the decrease of Enterobacteriaceae (Søballe and Poole, 2000; Wunderlichová et al., 2014). Also, several energy metabolism pathways seem important, such as pyruvate oxidation, the citrate cycle, and the Entner–Doudoroff pathway, suggests that the potential of microbes to assimilate essential compounds and all possible energy substrates is decreased when piglets are diarrheic. Our data also shows broad decreases in various transport systems (e.g., amino acid transport, sugar-specific PTS transport, monosaccharides transport) in diarrheic piglets (Figure ). E. coli utilization of L-ascorbate (i.e., vitamin C) under anaerobic condition is mediated by PTS-type transporters (Zhang et al., 2003). In the absence of glucose, L-arabinose activates the operon’s controlling gene in E. coli that drive arabinose-catabolization as a source of carbon and energy (Schleif, 2010). A separate metatranscriptome analysis supported this idea, as high expression of PTS genes belonging to Streptococci for rapid uptake and fermentation of available carbohydrates was observed (Zoetendal et al., 2012). The microbial genes for the degradation of sugar substrates from breast milk are the major source of nutrition for neonatal piglets. The decrease in these transport genes hampers phosphorylation of sugar substrates and suggests an imbalanced energy metabolism. Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that consistent reductions of transport genes have profound effects on the energetic metabolism and possibly play a role in the development of piglet diarrhea. Defects in the type III secretion system render a bacterium non-pathogenic (Gong et al., 2010); the QseBC two-component system was associated with bacterial quorum sensing and virulence factors expression (Weigel and Demuth, 2015). We observed that decreased gene relative abundances for the type III secretion system and the QseBC two-component system were mainly assigned to Escherichia, which exerts a barrier effect against enteropathogens (Hudault et al., 2001), and are responsible for providing vitamin K2 (Meganathan, 2001), suggesting a depleted beneficial metabolism from Escherichia in diarrheic piglets. Other two-component regulatory systems, such as KdpDE, LiaS-LiaR and GlnK-GlnL, may involves in the utilization of glutamine that maintain homeostasis of cellular energy and stress response (Satomura et al., 2005), and thus play a crucial role in the development in diarrhea. However, the metagenomic information available in this study represents only one step in the functional investigation of diarrhea-associated microbiota. Due to the small sample size of animals used in this study and the inter-individual variations in microbial composition and function, we failed to find the difference in relative abundance of the phylotypes at species level from our metagenomic data. Although there is evidence suggesting that Prevotella-correlated microbial aberration and dysfunction underpin the pathogenesis of piglet diarrhea, this striking finding requires to be validated in larger studies, for instances, those integrating the pathology and metabolism characteristics across a greater number of samples. In summary, the colonization of Prevotella and Fusobacteriaceae, the concurrent decreases in E. coli and that the majority of beneficial bacteria belong to the Firmicutes phylum, underscores the crucial role of the microbiota in the development of neonatal piglet diarrhea. Major functional gene sets associated with piglet diarrhea are involved in: (i) increased potential to promote the overgrowth of bacteria using ribosome biogenesis; (ii) reduced potential to assimilate and utilize multiple energy sources and circumvent microbial infections using the transport systems of polyamine, monosaccharide, amino acid, and sugar-specific PTS, as well as two-component regulatory systems. Identification of these biomarkers may enable interventions to reduce the occurrence of neonatal piglet diarrhea.

Author Contributions

SG conceived the experiment and revised the manuscript. QY performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SgZ, SwZ, XH, PW, SL, and WH conceived and designed the study and edited the manuscript. LL, WS, and ZY participated in the analysis and interpretation of data.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

Significant differences in relative abundance of OTUs at species level between diarrheic and healthy piglets.

OTUSpeciesHealthyDiarrheap-valueq-value


Mean abundanceSEMean abundanceSE
OTU19Prevotella stercorea9.60E-033.31E-037.18E-022.04E-029.99E-042.01E-02
OTU25Bacteroides caccae4.30E-045.26E-051.38E-024.49E-039.99E-042.01E-02
OTU1Escherichia coli1.20E-011.92E-022.00E-027.83E-039.99E-042.01E-02
OTU10Lactobacillus delbrueckii3.28E-021.53E-029.48E-043.55E-049.99E-042.01E-02
OTU70Eubacterium biforme4.66E-032.25E-034.92E-049.05E-059.99E-042.01E-02
OTU56Clostridium hathewayi5.16E-037.56E-042.14E-035.30E-043.00E-034.66E-02
OTU77Ruminococcus gnavus3.62E-034.23E-045.31E-041.86E-049.99E-042.01E-02
OTU106Ruminococcus gnavus2.07E-036.02E-044.72E-048.20E-059.99E-042.01E-02
OTU79Streptococcus luteciae3.73E-031.42E-033.98E-042.07E-049.99E-042.01E-02
OTU91Clostridium perfringens4.05E-035.03E-042.35E-041.14E-049.99E-042.01E-02
OTU116Enterococcus cecorum2.00E-033.30E-041.38E-041.01E-049.99E-042.01E-02
OTU135Collinsella aerofacie1.51E-037.14E-041.59E-044.70E-059.99E-042.01E-02
OTU170Sharpea azabuensis1.09E-037.48E-049.20E-065.09E-069.99E-042.01E-02
Table 2

Distribution of metagenomic reads from pig fecal samples annotated to the ribosome module and Spearman’s correlation between ribosome module and genera.

ModuleGenusSpearman’s correlationNumber of genesCoverage of the genes (%)
M00178:Ribosome, bacteriaPrevotella0.71438712.51
Bacteroides-0.42931110.71
Lactobacillus-0.71430410.46
Fusobacterium0.62047.02
Alistipes0.1432026.95
Clostridium-0.2571846.33
Odoribacter0.657943.24
Streptococcus-0.714923.17
Subdoligranulum-0.714842.89
Holdemanella-0.314832.86
Phascolarctobacterium0.086752.58
Oscillibacter0.543712.44
Sphaerochaeta0.486642.20
Desulfovibrio-0.486592.03
Campylobacter0.486582.00
Parabacteroides-0.657561.93
Butyricimonas0.086531.82
Sutterella0.486501.72
Veillonella-0.314471.62
Other42714.70
  67 in total

1.  Microbiome-based companion diagnostics: no longer science fiction?

Authors:  J Raes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Influence of the gastrointestinal microbiota on development of the immune system in young animals.

Authors:  Eva Bauer; Barbara A Williams; Hauke Smidt; Martin W A Verstegen; Rainer Mosenthin
Journal:  Curr Issues Intest Microbiol       Date:  2006-09

4.  SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Chang Yu; Yingrui Li; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Assessment of fecal bacterial diversity among healthy piglets during the weaning transition.

Authors:  Edward Alain B Pajarillo; Jong-Pyo Chae; Marilen P Balolong; Hyeun Bum Kim; Dae-Kyung Kang
Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.452

6.  A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Junjie Qin; Yingrui Li; Zhiming Cai; Shenghui Li; Jianfeng Zhu; Fan Zhang; Suisha Liang; Wenwei Zhang; Yuanlin Guan; Dongqian Shen; Yangqing Peng; Dongya Zhang; Zhuye Jie; Wenxian Wu; Youwen Qin; Wenbin Xue; Junhua Li; Lingchuan Han; Donghui Lu; Peixian Wu; Yali Dai; Xiaojuan Sun; Zesong Li; Aifa Tang; Shilong Zhong; Xiaoping Li; Weineng Chen; Ran Xu; Mingbang Wang; Qiang Feng; Meihua Gong; Jing Yu; Yanyan Zhang; Ming Zhang; Torben Hansen; Gaston Sanchez; Jeroen Raes; Gwen Falony; Shujiro Okuda; Mathieu Almeida; Emmanuelle LeChatelier; Pierre Renault; Nicolas Pons; Jean-Michel Batto; Zhaoxi Zhang; Hua Chen; Ruifu Yang; Weimou Zheng; Songgang Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; S Dusko Ehrlich; Rasmus Nielsen; Oluf Pedersen; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment.

Authors:  Xochitl C Morgan; Timothy L Tickle; Harry Sokol; Dirk Gevers; Kathryn L Devaney; Doyle V Ward; Joshua A Reyes; Samir A Shah; Neal LeLeiko; Scott B Snapper; Athos Bousvaros; Joshua Korzenik; Bruce E Sands; Ramnik J Xavier; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Jacques Izard; Levi Waldron; Dirk Gevers; Larisa Miropolsky; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Alan L Archibald; Hirohide Uenishi; Christopher K Tuggle; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Max F Rothschild; Claire Rogel-Gaillard; Chankyu Park; Denis Milan; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Shengting Li; Denis M Larkin; Heebal Kim; Laurent A F Frantz; Mario Caccamo; Hyeonju Ahn; Bronwen L Aken; Anna Anselmo; Christian Anthon; Loretta Auvil; Bouabid Badaoui; Craig W Beattie; Christian Bendixen; Daniel Berman; Frank Blecha; Jonas Blomberg; Lars Bolund; Mirte Bosse; Sara Botti; Zhan Bujie; Megan Bystrom; Boris Capitanu; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Patrick Chardon; Celine Chen; Ryan Cheng; Sang-Haeng Choi; William Chow; Richard C Clark; Christopher Clee; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Harry D Dawson; Patrice Dehais; Fioravante De Sapio; Bert Dibbits; Nizar Drou; Zhi-Qiang Du; Kellye Eversole; João Fadista; Susan Fairley; Thomas Faraut; Geoffrey J Faulkner; Katie E Fowler; Merete Fredholm; Eric Fritz; James G R Gilbert; Elisabetta Giuffra; Jan Gorodkin; Darren K Griffin; Jennifer L Harrow; Alexander Hayward; Kerstin Howe; Zhi-Liang Hu; Sean J Humphray; Toby Hunt; Henrik Hornshøj; Jin-Tae Jeon; Patric Jern; Matthew Jones; Jerzy Jurka; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Ronan Kapetanovic; Jaebum Kim; Jae-Hwan Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Tae-Hun Kim; Greger Larson; Kyooyeol Lee; Kyung-Tai Lee; Richard Leggett; Harris A Lewin; Yingrui Li; Wansheng Liu; Jane E Loveland; Yao Lu; Joan K Lunney; Jian Ma; Ole Madsen; Katherine Mann; Lucy Matthews; Stuart McLaren; Takeya Morozumi; Michael P Murtaugh; Jitendra Narayan; Dinh Truong Nguyen; Peixiang Ni; Song-Jung Oh; Suneel Onteru; Frank Panitz; Eung-Woo Park; Hong-Seog Park; Geraldine Pascal; Yogesh Paudel; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Ricardo Ramirez-Gonzalez; James M Reecy; Sandra Rodriguez-Zas; Gary A Rohrer; Lauretta Rund; Yongming Sang; Kyle Schachtschneider; Joshua G Schraiber; John Schwartz; Linda Scobie; Carol Scott; Stephen Searle; Bertrand Servin; Bruce R Southey; Goran Sperber; Peter Stadler; Jonathan V Sweedler; Hakim Tafer; Bo Thomsen; Rashmi Wali; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Simon White; Xun Xu; Martine Yerle; Guojie Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Jie Zhang; Shuhong Zhao; Jane Rogers; Carol Churcher; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children.

Authors:  Dae-Wook Kang; Jin Gyoon Park; Zehra Esra Ilhan; Garrick Wallstrom; Joshua Labaer; James B Adams; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  27 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in healthy and diarrheic yaks.

Authors:  JunJun Liu; Xin Wang; Wenqian Zhang; Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam Kulyar; Kalim Ullah; Zhaoqing Han; Jianhua Qin; Chongliang Bi; Yaping Wang; Kun Li
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.352

2.  Dynamic Distribution of Gut Microbiota in Pigs at Different Growth Stages: Composition and Contribution.

Authors:  Yuheng Luo; Wen Ren; Hauke Smidt; André-Denis G Wright; Bing Yu; Ghislain Schyns; Ursula M McCormack; Aaron J Cowieson; Jie Yu; Jun He; Hui Yan; Jinlong Wu; Roderick I Mackie; Daiwen Chen
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Early Weaning and Milk Substitutes Affect the Gut Microbiome, Metabolomics, and Antibody Profile in Goat Kids Suffering From Diarrhea.

Authors:  Tao Zhong; Cheng Wang; Xinlu Wang; Aline Freitas-de-Melo; Bo Zeng; Qianjun Zhao; Siyuan Zhan; Linjie Wang; Jiaxue Cao; Dinghui Dai; Jiazhong Guo; Li Li; Hongping Zhang; Lili Niu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Dietary osteopontin-enriched algal protein as nutritional support in weaned pigs infected with F18-fimbriated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brooke N Smith; Melissa Hannas; Catiane Orso; Simone M M K Martins; Mei Wang; Sharon M Donovan; Ryan N Dilger
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Altered gut microbiota associated with intestinal disease in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus).

Authors:  Ngoc Tuan Tran; Jing Zhang; Fan Xiong; Gui-Tang Wang; Wen-Xiang Li; Shan-Gong Wu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  The Gastrointestinal Microbiota of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Alexander Sheh
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Metabolic Syndrome During Perinatal Period in Sows and the Link With Gut Microbiota and Metabolites.

Authors:  Chuanshang Cheng; Hongkui Wei; Huichao Yu; Chuanhui Xu; Siwen Jiang; Jian Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Composition of the Fecal Microbiota of Piglets at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yadan Liu; Juan Liu; Haizhen Wang; Yulong Guo; Min Du; Chunbo Cai; Yan Zhao; Chang Lu; Xiaohong Guo; Guoqing Cao; Zhibian Duan; Bugao Li; Pengfei Gao
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-15

9.  Comparison of the Luminal and Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in the Colon of Pigs with and without Swine Dysentery.

Authors:  Eric R Burrough; Bailey L Arruda; Paul J Plummer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-24

10.  Differences in the Gut Microbiota Establishment and Metabolome Characteristics Between Low- and Normal-Birth-Weight Piglets During Early-Life.

Authors:  Na Li; Shimeng Huang; Lili Jiang; Wei Wang; Tiantian Li; Bin Zuo; Zhen Li; Junjun Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.