Literature DB >> 28392134

Change in Pelvic Sagittal Inclination From Supine to Standing Position Before Hip Arthroplasty.

Keisuke Uemura1, Masaki Takao1, Yoshito Otake2, Koki Koyama2, Futoshi Yokota2, Hidetoshi Hamada3, Takashi Sakai3, Yoshinobu Sato2, Nobuhiko Sugano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cup anteversion and inclination are important for avoiding implant impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. However, functional cup anteversion and cup inclination also change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. Therefore, PSI in both supine and standing positions was measured in a large cohort in this study.
METHODS: A total of 422 patients (median age, 61; range, 15-87) who underwent total hip arthroplasty were the subjects of this study. There were 83 patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA), 274 patients with developmental dysplasia-derived secondary OA, 48 patients with osteonecrosis, and 17 patients with rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC). Preoperative PSI in supine and standing positions was measured by automated computed topography segmentation and landmark localization of the pelvis followed by intensity-based 2D-3D registration, and the number of cases in which PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly was calculated. Hip disease, sex, and age were analyzed if they were related to a PSI change of more than 10°.
RESULTS: The median PSI was 5.1° (interquartile range, 0.4°-9.4°) in supine and -1.3° (interquartile range, -6.5° to 4.2°) in standing position. There were 79 cases (19%) in which the PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing. Elder age and patients with primary OA and RDC were revealed to be the related factors.
CONCLUSION: PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing in 19% of cases. Age and diagnosis of primary OA and RDC were the significant factors for the posterior rotation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic measurement; hip; pelvic sagittal inclination; standing position; supine position; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28392134     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Masashi Okamoto; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Implications of Spinopelvic Mobility on Total Hip Arthroplasty: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  John D Attenello; Jeffery K Harpstrite
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-11

3.  Does Acetabular Coverage Vary Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Patients with Hip Dysplasia?

Authors:  Tetsuya Tachibana; Masanori Fujii; Kenji Kitamura; Tetsuro Nakamura; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reliability and Validity Analysis of Pelvic Sagittal Inclination Calculated by Inverse Cosine Function Method on Pelvic Anteroposterior Radiographs.

Authors:  Hao-Han Huang; Yan Chen; Zhao-Xun Chen; Chang-Qing Zhao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The effect of pelvic tilt on three-dimensional coverage of the femoral head: A computational simulation study using patient-specific anatomy.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.