Literature DB >> 28391439

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: First 407 Patients in 1 year.

Yonatan Lessing1, Niv Pencovich2, Marian Khatib2,3, Shai Meron-Eldar2,3, Joseph Koriansky2,3, Subhi Abu-Abeid2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a promising laparoscopic procedure with various benefits including shorter operating times and less operative complications. That said, it is yet to gain widespread acceptance. Here, we describe our first-year experience with OAGB in our department, in particular the safety and efficacy of this procedure.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent OAGB between March 2015 and March 2016 by our bariatric surgery unit. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed as well as outcomes during the first year.
RESULTS: Four hundred and seven patients underwent OAGB (254 females, average age 41.8 ± 12.05, BMI = 41.7 ± 5.77 kg/m2). Ninety-eight patients (24%) had prior bariatric surgery. Ninety-four patients (23%) had diabetes, 93 patients (22.8%) had hypertension, 123 (28.8%) had hyperlipidemia, and 35 patients (8.6%) suffered from obstructive sleep apnea. Eight patients (1.96%) had early minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 1-3a), and 10 patients (2.45%) suffered early major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b). The average length of hospital stay was 2.2 ± 0.84 days (range 2-10 days). Twenty patients (4.8%) were readmitted, and 10 patients underwent reoperation. Patients who had had previous bariatric surgery had higher rates of complications, a prolonged hospital admission, higher rates of readmission, and early reoperations. The average excess weight loss (%EWL) 1 year following surgery was 88.9 ± 27.3 and 72.8 ± 43.5% in patients that underwent primary and revision OAGB, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: OAGB is both safe and effective as a primary as well as a revision bariatric surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Bariatric; Mini-gastric bypass; Obesity; Sleeve gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391439     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2668-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  24 in total

1.  A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  K S Kular; N Manchanda; R Rutledge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  A Vignali; S Di Palo; P De Nardi; G Radaelli; E Orsenigo; C Staudacher
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  T L Trus; G D Pope; S R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases.

Authors:  R Rutledge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy.

Authors:  Jean Marc Chevallier; Gustavo A Arman; Martino Guenzi; Cedric Rau; Mathieu Bruzzi; Nathan Beaupel; Frank Zinzindohoué; Anne Berger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012.

Authors:  Su-Hsin Chang; Carolyn R T Stoll; Jihyun Song; J Esteban Varela; Christopher J Eagon; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  [Surgical treatment of morbid obesity].

Authors:  Andrei Keidar; Subhi Abu Abeid; Gabriela Lieberman; Rakefet Bachrach; David Zacharovitch; Itamar Raz
Journal:  Harefuah       Date:  2008-11

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Supreet Singh Bindra; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  The influence of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jan Franko; Brendan G O'Connell; John R Mehall; Steven G Harper; Joseph H Nejman; D Mark Zebley; Steven A Fassler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  George Darby Pope; John D Birkmeyer; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Giacomo Piatto; Giovanni Merola; Jacques Himpens; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Alberto Sartori; Nicola Clemente; Miguel Herrera; Kelvin Higa; Wendy A Brown; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: an Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Magouliotis; Vasiliki S Tasiopoulou; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Magouliotis; Vasiliki S Tasiopoulou; Alexis A Svokos; Konstantina A Svokos; Eleni Sioka; Dimitrios Zacharoulis
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Tailored One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 3-Year Outcomes of 94 Patients.

Authors:  Theodoropoulos Charalampos; Natoudi Maria; Vrakopoulou Gavriella Zoi Vrakopoulou; Triantafyllou Tania; Dimitrios Raptis; Zografos George; Leandros Emmanouil; Albanopoulos Konstantinos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  The effect of stoma size on the mid-term weight loss outcome of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): a single-blinded prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Elgeidie; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Mohamed El Sorogy; Ayman El Nakeeb; Mohamad Elrefai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study.

Authors:  Almino C Ramos; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Kamal Mahawar; Wendy Brown; Lilian Kow; Kevin P White; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery-a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Charleen Yeo; Glen Ho; Nicholas Syn; Malcolm Mak; Saleem Ahmed; Aung Myint Oo; Aaryan Koura; Sanghvi Kaushal; Danson Yeo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Tiffany Tie; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Scott Shikora; Wendy A Brown
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Association Between Circular Stapler Diameter and Stricture Rates Following Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Allen; C I Wells; M Greenslade; I P Bissett; G O'Grady
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients.

Authors:  Chetan D Parmar; Kamal K Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.