Literature DB >> 28391431

Sclerostin Antibody Increases Callus Size and Strength but does not Improve Fracture Union in a Challenged Open Rat Fracture Model.

Alyson Morse1,2, Michelle M McDonald1,3, Aaron Schindeler1,2, Lauren Peacock1, Kathy Mikulec1, Tegan L Cheng1,2, Min Liu4, Hua Zhu Ke5, David G Little6,7.   

Abstract

Open fractures remain a challenge in orthopedics. Current strategies to intervene are often inadequate, particularly in severe fractures or when treatment is delayed. Sclerostin is a negative regulator of bone growth and sclerostin-neutralizing antibodies (Scl-Ab) can increase bone mass and strength. The application of these antibodies to improve orthopedic repair has shown varied results, and may be dependent on the location and severity of the bony injury. We examined Scl-Ab treatment within an established rat osteotomy model with periosteal stripping analogous to open fracture repair. In one study, Scl-Ab was given 25 mg/kg bi-weekly, either from the time of fracture or from 3 weeks post-fracture up to an end-point of 12 weeks. A second study treated only delayed union open fractures that did not show radiographic union by week 6 post-fracture. Outcome measures included radiographic union, microCT analysis of bone volume and architecture, and histology. In the first study, Scl-Ab given from either 0 or 3 weeks significantly improved callus bone volume (+52%, p < 0.05 and +58%, p < 0.01) at 12 weeks, as well as strength (+48%, p < 0.05 and +70%, p < 0.05). Despite these improvements, union rate was not changed. In the second study treating only established delayed fractures, bony callus volume was similarly increased by Scl-Ab treatment; however, this did not translate to increased biomechanical strength or union improvement. Sclerostin antibody treatment has limited effects on the healing of challenging open fractures with periosteal stripping, but shows the greatest benefits on callus size and strength with earlier intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed union; Open fracture; Osteotomy; Sclerostin; Sost

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391431     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0275-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sclerostin: an Emerging Target for the Treatment of Cancer-Induced Bone Disease.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Jesus Delgado-Calle
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Diabetes and Impaired Fracture Healing: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mina Tanios; Bradley Brickman; Emily Cage; Kassem Abbas; Cody Smith; Marina Atallah; Sudipta Baroi; Beata Lecka-Czernik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.163

Review 3.  Drug discovery of sclerostin inhibitors.

Authors:  Sifan Yu; Dijie Li; Ning Zhang; Shuaijian Ni; Meiheng Sun; Luyao Wang; Huan Xiao; Dingdong Liu; Jin Liu; Yuanyuan Yu; Zongkang Zhang; Samuel Tin Yui Yeung; Shu Zhang; Aiping Lu; Zhenlin Zhang; Baoting Zhang; Ge Zhang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 14.903

4.  The effects of romosozumab combined with active vitamin D3 on fracture healing in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Ryota Takase; Yuta Tsubouchi; Takefumi Otsu; Takashi Kataoka; Tatsuya Iwasaki; Masashi Kataoka; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  Real-time finite element analysis allows homogenization of tissue scale strains and reduces variance in a mouse defect healing model.

Authors:  Graeme R Paul; Esther Wehrle; Duncan C Tourolle; Gisela A Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.