Literature DB >> 28391144

Sources and fate of antimicrobials in integrated fish-pig and non-integrated tilapia farms.

Kang Li1, Liping Liu2, Jia Zhan3, Marie-Louise Scippo4, Kristian Hvidtfeldt5, Yuan Liu6, Anders Dalsgaard7.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial contamination in aquaculture products constitutes a food safety hazard, but little is known about the introduction and accumulation of antimicrobials in integrated fish-pig aquaculture. This study, conducted in 2013, aimed to determine the residues of 11 types of antimicrobials by UPLC-MS/MS analysis in fish feed (n=37), pig feed (n=9), pig manure (n=9), pond sediment (n=20), fish skin (n=20) and muscle tissue (n=20) sampled from integrated tilapia-pig farms, non-integrated tilapia farms and fish feed supply shops. There was a higher occurrence of antimicrobial residues in fish skin from both integrated and non-integrated farms, and in pig manure. Enrofloxacin (3.9-129.3μg/kg) and sulfadiazine (0.7-7.8μg/kg) were commonly detected in fish skin and muscle, pig manure and pond sediment from integrated farms, with different types of antimicrobials found in pig manure and tilapia samples. In non-integrated farms, sulfadiazine (2.5-89.9μg/kg) was the predominant antimicrobial detected in fish skin and muscle, fish feed and pond sediment. In general, antimicrobials seemed not to be commonly transmitted from pig to fish in tilapia-pig integrated farms, and fish feed, pig feed and pond sediment did not seem as important sources of the antimicrobials found in fish from both systems. The frequent findings of antimicrobial residues in fish skin compared with fish muscle was probably due to different pharmacokinetics in different tissue types, which have practical food safety implications since antimicrobial residues monitoring is usually performed analyzing mixed skin and fish muscle samples.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial residues; Feed; Integrated production system; Pig manure; Sediment; Tilapia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391144     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  1 in total

1.  Can Reclaimed Water Be Used for Sustainable Food Production in Aquaponics?

Authors:  Liliana Cifuentes-Torres; Gabriel Correa-Reyes; Leopoldo G Mendoza-Espinosa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.