Literature DB >> 28391033

Offline continuous theta burst stimulation over right inferior frontal gyrus and pre-supplementary motor area impairs inhibition during a go/no-go task.

Neil M Drummond1, Erin K Cressman2, Anthony N Carlsen2.   

Abstract

In a typical go/no-go task a single imperative stimulus is presented each trial, either a go or no-go stimulus. Participants are instructed to initiate a known response upon appearance of the go-signal and withhold the response if the no-go signal is presented. It is unclear whether the go-response is prepared in advance of the imperative stimulus in a go/no-go task. Moreover, it is unclear if inhibitory control processes suppress preparatory go-activation. The purpose of the present experiment was 1) to determine whether the go-response is prepared in advance of stimulus identification with the use of a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), and 2) investigate the inhibitory role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) during the performance of a go/no-go task with the use of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). The experiment consisted of three phases; a pre-cTBS phase in which participants completed a go/no-go and simple-RT task, followed by offline cTBS to temporarily deactivate either rIFG or preSMA (with a sham control), then a post-cTBS phase which was identical to the pre-cTBS phase. Results revealed that stimulation to both cortical sites impaired participants' ability to withhold movements during no-go trials. Notably, rIFG or preSMA stimulation did not affect the latency of voluntary go-responses and did not enable the SAS to involuntarily trigger responses. These findings suggest that preparation and initiation of the go-response occurs after the imperative stimulus, with the rIFG and preSMA involved in inhibiting the go-response once the stimulus is identified as a no-go signal.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioural control; Continuous theta burst stimulation; Go/no-go task; Response inhibition; Response initiation; Startling acoustic stimulus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391033     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Connectivity of the Frontal Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Inhibitory Control During a Go/No-Go Task as a Predictive Biomarker in Major Depression.

Authors:  Ying-Lin Han; Zhong-Peng Dai; Mohammad Chattun Ridwan; Pin-Hua Lin; Hong-Liang Zhou; Hao-Fei Wang; Zhi-Jian Yao; Qing Lu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Dissociable Effects of Theta-Burst Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus on Inhibitory Control in Nicotine Addiction.

Authors:  Roger D Newman-Norlund; Makayla Gibson; Patrick A McConnell; Brett Froeliger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Neural similarity between mentalizing and live social interaction during the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  Junaid S Merchant; Diana Alkire; Elizabeth Redcay
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  Secondary motor areas for response inhibition: an epicortical recording and stimulation study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Takeyama; Riki Matsumoto; Kiyohide Usami; Takuro Nakae; Akihiro Shimotake; Takayuki Kikuchi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Takeharu Kunieda; Susumu Miyamoto; Ryosuke Takahashi; Akio Ikeda
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inhibits improvement on a working memory task.

Authors:  Teodóra Vékony; Viola Luca Németh; Adrienn Holczer; Krisztián Kocsis; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; László Vécsei; Anita Must
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.