Literature DB >> 28390883

Is Orthopedic Department Teaching Status Associated With Adverse Outcomes Of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Matthew R Boylan1, Dean C Perfetti2, Qais Naziri2, Aditya V Maheshwari2, Carl B Paulino2, Michael A Mont3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although resident physicians play a vital role in the US health care system, they are believed to create inefficiencies in the delivery of care. Under the regional component of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model, teaching hospitals are forced to compete on efficiency and outcomes with nonteaching hospitals.
METHODS: We identified 86,021 patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty in New York State between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. Outcomes included length and cost of the index admission, disposition, and 90-day readmission. Mixed-effects regression models compared teaching vs nonteaching orthopedic hospitals after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital, surgeon, and year of surgery.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery at teaching hospitals had longer lengths of stay (β = 3.2%; P < .001) and higher costs of admission (β = 13.6%; P < .001). There were no differences in disposition status (odds ratio = 1.03; P = .779). The risk of 90-day readmission was lower for teaching hospitals (odds ratio = 0.89; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Primary total hip arthroplasty at teaching orthopedic hospitals is characterized by greater utilization of health care resources during the index admission. This suggests that teaching hospitals may be adversely affected by reimbursement tied to competition on economic and clinical metrics. Although a certain level of inefficiency is inherent during the learning process, these policies may hinder learning opportunities for residents in the clinical setting.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; healthcare; readmission; teaching status; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28390883     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  The impact of surgical trainee involvement in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan S Marder; Ian Gopie; Chibuokem P Ikwuazom; Declan Tozzi; Neil V Shah; Qais Naziri; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-05

2.  Does Resident Participation Influence Surgical Time and Clinical Outcomes? An Analysis on Primary Bilateral Single-Staged Sequential Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Christopher T Garnett; Tzu H Cheng; Joshua R Buksbaum; Vivek Singh; Neil V Shah
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Relationship between hospital size and teaching status on outcomes for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; J D Whaley; M LaVelle; G Petersen-Fitts; D Lombardo; D Yong; D Malone; J Khan; D J L Lima
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-01-01

4.  Economic Impact of Outpatient Medicare Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Charles M Davis; Eric R Swenson; Travis M Lehman; Derek A Haas
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Does Hospital Teaching Status Matter? Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Pattern and Incidence of 90-day Readmissions After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tracy M Borsinger; April W Simon; Steven D Culler; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Returning to Normalcy or Returning to a New Normal?

Authors:  Erik N Zeegen; Adolph J Yates; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.