Literature DB >> 28390649

Abbreviated closure for remote damage control laparotomy in extreme environments: A randomized trial of sutures versus wound clamps comparing terrestrial and weightless conditions.

Andrew W Kirkpatrick1, Jessica Lynn McKee2, Colonel Homer Tien3, Anthony J LaPorta4, Kit Lavell5, Tim Leslie6, Paul B McBeth7, Derek J Roberts8, Chad G Ball9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Far-Forward Damage Control Laparotomies (DCLs) might provide direct-compression of visceral hemorrhage, however, suturing is a limiting factor, especially for non-physicians. We thus compared abbreviated skin closures comparing skin-suture (SS) versus wound-clamp (WC), on-board a research aircraft in weightlessness (0g) and normal gravity (1g).
METHODS: Surgeons conducted DCLs on a surgical-simulator; onboard the hangered-aircraft (1g), or during parabolic flight (0g), randomized to either WC or SS.
RESULTS: Ten surgeons participated. Two (40%) surgeons randomized to suture in 0g were incapacitated with motion-sickness, and none were able to close in either 1 or 0g. With WC, two completely closed in 1g as did three in 0g, despite having longer incisions (p = 0.016). Overall skin-closure with WC was significantly greater in both 1g (p = 0.016) and 0g (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: WC was more effective in 1g and particularly 0g. Future studies should address the utility of abbreviated WC abdominal closure to facilitate potential Far-Forward DCL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID ISRCTN/77929274.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Damage control surgery; Exsanguination; Operational medicine; Surgical simulation; Tactical medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28390649     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  4 in total

1.  A “human-proof pointy-end”: a robotically applied hemostatic clamp for care-under-fire

Authors:  Ian A. McKee; Jessica L. McKee; Brian E. Knudsen; Ryan Shelton; Tony LaPorta; Juan Wachs; Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during spaceflight - a guideline for CPR in microgravity from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM) and the European Society of Aerospace Medicine Space Medicine Group (ESAM-SMG).

Authors:  Jochen Hinkelbein; Steffen Kerkhoff; Christoph Adler; Anton Ahlbäck; Stefan Braunecker; Daniel Burgard; Fabrizio Cirillo; Edoardo De Robertis; Eckard Glaser; Theresa K Haidl; Pete Hodkinson; Ivan Zefiro Iovino; Stefanie Jansen; Kolaparambil Varghese Lydia Johnson; Saskia Jünger; Matthieu Komorowski; Marion Leary; Christina Mackaill; Alexander Nagrebetsky; Christopher Neuhaus; Lucas Rehnberg; Giovanni Marco Romano; Thais Russomano; Jan Schmitz; Oliver Spelten; Clément Starck; Seamus Thierry; Rochelle Velho; Tobias Warnecke
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Robot-assisted surgery in space: pros and cons. A review from the surgeon's point of view.

Authors:  Desirè Pantalone; Giulia Satu Faini; Francesca Cialdai; Elettra Sereni; Stefano Bacci; Daniele Bani; Marco Bernini; Carlo Pratesi; PierLuigi Stefàno; Lorenzo Orzalesi; Michele Balsamo; Valfredo Zolesi; Monica Monici
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.415

4.  Robotically applied hemostatic clamping for care-under-fire: harnessing bomb robots for hemorrhage control.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ian A McKee; Brian Knudsen; Ryan Shelton; Anthony J LaPorta; Juan Wachs; Jessica L McKee
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.