Simone Y Loo1,2, Sophie Dell'Aniello2, Laetitia Huiart3, Christel Renoux1,2,4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. INSERM, CIC 1410, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion, Saint-Pierre, France. 4. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are alternatives to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of thromboembolism. It is unclear how NOACs have been adopted in the UK since first introduced in 2008. The present study was conducted to describe the trends in the prescription of NOACs in the UK, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. METHODS: Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the rates of new use of NOACs and VKAs from 2009 to 2015 were calculated using Poisson regression. Patient characteristics associated with NOAC initiation were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall rate of oral anticoagulant initiation increased by 58% over the study period [rate ratio (RR) 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23, 2.03], even as the rate of new VKA use decreased by 31% (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52, 0.93). By contrast, the rate of initiation of NOAC increased, particularly from 2012 onwards, with a 17-fold increase from 2012 to 2015 (RR 17.68; 95% CI 12.16, 25.71). In 2015, NOACs accounted for 56.5% of oral anticoagulant prescriptions, with rivaroxaban prescribed most frequently, followed by apixaban and then dabigatran. Compared to VKAs, new NOAC users were less likely to have congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease, and more likely to have a history of ischaemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, the rate of initiation of NOACs has increased substantially since 2009, and these agents have now surpassed VKAs as the anticoagulant of choice. Moreover, the characteristics of patients initiated on NOACs have changed over time, and this should be accounted for in future studies comparing NOACs and VKAs.
AIMS: Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are alternatives to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of thromboembolism. It is unclear how NOACs have been adopted in the UK since first introduced in 2008. The present study was conducted to describe the trends in the prescription of NOACs in the UK, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. METHODS: Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the rates of new use of NOACs and VKAs from 2009 to 2015 were calculated using Poisson regression. Patient characteristics associated with NOAC initiation were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall rate of oral anticoagulant initiation increased by 58% over the study period [rate ratio (RR) 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23, 2.03], even as the rate of new VKA use decreased by 31% (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52, 0.93). By contrast, the rate of initiation of NOAC increased, particularly from 2012 onwards, with a 17-fold increase from 2012 to 2015 (RR 17.68; 95% CI 12.16, 25.71). In 2015, NOACs accounted for 56.5% of oral anticoagulant prescriptions, with rivaroxaban prescribed most frequently, followed by apixaban and then dabigatran. Compared to VKAs, new NOAC users were less likely to have congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease, and more likely to have a history of ischaemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, the rate of initiation of NOACs has increased substantially since 2009, and these agents have now surpassed VKAs as the anticoagulant of choice. Moreover, the characteristics of patients initiated on NOACs have changed over time, and this should be accounted for in future studies comparing NOACs and VKAs.
Authors: Susan S Jick; James A Kaye; Catherine Vasilakis-Scaramozza; Luis A Garcia Rodríguez; Ana Ruigómez; Christoph R Meier; Raymond G Schlienger; Corri Black; Hershel Jick Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Rupert Bauersachs; Scott D Berkowitz; Benjamin Brenner; Harry R Buller; Hervé Decousus; Alex S Gallus; Anthonie W Lensing; Frank Misselwitz; Martin H Prins; Gary E Raskob; Annelise Segers; Peter Verhamme; Phil Wells; Giancarlo Agnelli; Henri Bounameaux; Alexander Cohen; Bruce L Davidson; Franco Piovella; Sebastian Schellong Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Rikke Sørensen; Morten Lock Hansen; Morten Lamberts; Peter Weeke; Anders P Mikkelsen; Lars Køber; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Emil L Fosbøl Journal: Europace Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ellie Danielson; Yves Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Steven R Deitcher; Mary Cushman; Stephan Moll; Craig M Kessler; C Gregory Elliott; Rolf Paulson; Turnly Wong; Kenneth A Bauer; Bruce A Schwartz; Joseph P Miletich; Henri Bounameaux; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jan Heeringa; Deirdre A M van der Kuip; Albert Hofman; Jan A Kors; Gerard van Herpen; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Theo Stijnen; Gregory Y H Lip; Jacqueline C M Witteman Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-03-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Daria Generalova; Scott Cunningham; Stephen J Leslie; Gordon F Rushworth; Laura McIver; Derek Stewart Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jared P Beller; Elizabeth D Krebs; Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Mohammed A Quader; Alan M Speir; Andy C Kiser; Mark Joseph; Leora T Yarboro; Nicholas R Teman; Gorav Ailawadi Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Rhanderson Cardoso; Stephan Willems; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Atul Verma; Richard Schilling; Stefan H Hohnloser; Ken Okumura; Matias Nordaby; Marc A Brouwer; Hugh Calkins Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: William Beedham; George Peck; Simon E Richardson; Kevin Tsang; Michael Fertleman; David Jh Shipway Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.659