Literature DB >> 28389804

Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD.

Tomoki Aburatani1, Kazuyuki Kojima2, Sho Otsuki3, Hideaki Murase3, Keisuke Okuno3, Kentaro Gokita3, Chiharu Tomii3, Toshiro Tanioka3, Mikito Inokuchi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is widely performed in Japan as a function-preserving surgical approach. Since esophagogastrostomy (EG) was associated with increased reflux symptoms and anastomotic strictures, we have chosen double-tract reconstruction (DTR) as the standard reconstruction method since March 2013. In this study, we described a novel method of laparoscopic DTR using detachable ENDO-PSD and compared its 1-year outcome with EG performed formerly in our institution.
METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic PG between May 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively divided into two groups based on the type of reconstruction and were subsequently analyzed (19 patients in the DTR group and 22 in the EG group). All of them underwent a laparoscopic PG with regional lymph node dissection. In the DTR group, the lower left port site was extended to 4 cm, and an intracorporeal purse-string suture was performed using the detachable ENDO-PSD. The jejunogastrostomy was fashioned on the anterior side of the remnant stomach parallel to the transection line, 2 cm from the cut end. The EG group used the conventional purse-string suture instrument through the 6 cm upper midline mini-laparotomy incision. Patient characteristics, operative data, early operative complications and 1-year postoperative follow-up findings were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The frequencies of reflux symptoms (10.5 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.003), usage of proton pump inhibitors (31.6 vs. 72.7%, P = 0.008), and anastomotic strictures (0 vs. 27%, P = 0.014) were significantly lower in the DTR group as compared to the EG group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, average postoperative/preoperative weight loss ratio, and postoperative/preoperative ratio of biochemical markers (hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, cholesterol).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that DTR is a useful reconstruction method after PG, especially in terms of preventing reflux esophagitis and anastomotic strictures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-tract reconstruction; ENDO-PSD; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Proximal gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389804     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5539-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Completely laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  I Uyama; A Sugioka; J Fujita; Y Komori; H Matsui; A Hasumi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Meal size, satiety and cholecystokinin in gastrectomized humans.

Authors:  C Bergh; S Sjöstedt; G Hellers; M Zandian; P Södersten
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhide Kumagai; Kouji Shimizu; Noboru Yokoyama; Sadatsugu Aida; Shuei Arima; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Ju Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Tanimura; M Higashino; Y Fukunaga; S Kishida; A Ogata; Y Fujiwara; H Osugi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification.

Authors:  J Rüdiger Siewert; Marcus Feith; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Shuo-Meng Xiao; Ling-Chao Tang; Zhi Ding; Xiang Zhou; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification.

Authors:  Makoto Kubo; Mitsuru Sasako; Takuji Gotoda; Hiroyuki Ono; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Daizo Saito; Takeshi Sano; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  The role of laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Theodoros E Pavlidis; Efstathios T Pavlidis; Athanasios K Sakantamis
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.407

View more
  15 in total

1.  Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshiro Tanioka; Rawat Waratchanont; Ryosuke Fukuyo; Toshifumi Saito; Yuya Umebayashi; Emi Kanemoto; Kenta Kobayashi; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Mikito Inokuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Tan; Meng-Ni Ran; Zi-Lin Liu; Ling-Han Tang; Zhou Ma; Zhou He; Zhou Xu; Fang-Han Li; Jiang-Wei Xiao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Is single tract jejunal interposition better than double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy?

Authors:  Shuaibing Lu; Fei Ma; Wei Yang; Liangqun Peng; Yawei Hua
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-08

Review 4.  A review on double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tricia S Lewis; YongDong Feng
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Protocol for Comparing the Efficacy of Three Reconstruction Methods of the Digestive Tract (Kamikawa Versus Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Tube-Like Stomach) After Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Wei Dong Wang; Rui Qi Gao; Tong Chen; Dan Hong Dong; Qin Chuan Yang; Hai Kun Zhou; Jiang Peng Wei; Peng Fei Yu; Xi Sheng Yang; Xiao Hua Li; Gang Ji
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  Clinical outcomes of gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Tetsuya Ito; Okihide Suzuki; Kyoichi Ogata; Youichi Kumagai; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  A meta-analysis of comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shengnan Li; Lihu Gu; Zefeng Shen; Danyi Mao; Parikshit A Khadaroo; Hui Su
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zakari Shaibu; Zhihong Chen; Said Abdulrahman Salim Mzee; Acquah Theophilus; Isah Adamu Danbala
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Reconstruction Methods and Complications of Esophagogastrostomy and Jejunal Interposition in Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Du; Pei Wu; Pengliang Wang; Yuwei Du; Kai Li; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu; Zhi Zhu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique versus laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Kano; M Ohashi; S Ida; K Kumagai; T Sano; N Hiki; S Nunobe
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.