| Literature DB >> 28389667 |
Catherine Beaumont1, Élisabeth Walsh-Wilkinson1, Marie-Claude Drolet1, Élise Roussel1, Marie Arsenault2, Jacques Couet3.
Abstract
Aortic valve regurgitation (AR) imposes a volume overload (VO) to the left ventricle (LV). Male rats with a pathological heart overload usually progress more quickly towards heart failure than females. We examined whether a sexual dimorphism exists in the myocardial transcriptional adaptations to AR. Adult Wistar male and female rats either underwent a sham operation or were induced with AR and then followed for 26 weeks. Female AR rats gained relatively more LV mass than males (75 vs. 42%). They had a similar increase in LV chamber dimensions compared to males but more wall thickening. On the other hand, fatty acid oxidation (FAO)-related LV enzyme activity was only decreased in AR males. The expression of genes encoding FAO-related enzymes was only reduced in AR males and not in females. A similar situation was observed for the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis or function as well as for genes encoding for transcription factors implicated in the control of bioenergetics and mitochondrial function (Errα, Errγ or Pgc1α). Although females develop more LV hypertrophy from severe VO, their myocardial gene expression remains closer to normal. This could provide survival benefits for females with severe VO.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28389667 PMCID: PMC5429715 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00855-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Animal characteristics at the end of the study.
| Parameters | ShM (n = 11/11) | ShF (n = 7/10) | ArM (n = 7/7) | ArF (n = 7/8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight, g | 703 ± 27.9 | 349 ± 13.5b | 668 ± 45.3 | 353 ± 15.3b |
| Heart, mg | 1604 ± 70.8 | 882 ± 30.5b | 2282 ± 96.6a | 1563 ± 101.1a, b |
| Ind. Heart, mg/g | 2.3 ± 0.11 | 2.5 ± 0.09 | 3.4 ± 0.14a | 4.4 ± 0.12a, b |
| LV, mg | 985 ± 26.6 | 591 ± 20.9b | 1550 ± 70.1a | 1094 ± 66.0a, b |
| Ind. LV, mg/g | 1.4 ± 0.06 | 1.7 ± 0.06 | 2.3 ± 0.07a | 3.1 ± 0.23a, b |
| Right ventricle, mg | 333 ± 14.0 | 185 ± 6.7b | 424 ± 22.2a | 320 ± 40.4a, b |
| Ind. RV, mg/g | 0.48 ± 0.025 | 0.53 ± 0.022 | 0.66 ± 0.063a | 0.90 ± 0.133a, b |
| Retroperitoneal fat, g | 8.9 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.4b | 6.7 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.5b |
Sham: sham-operated controls; Ar: aortic regurgitation; M: male rats and F: female rats. LV: left ventricle, RV: right ventricle and Ind. indexed. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of animals per group is indicated in parentheses. ap < 0.05 vs. the corresponding sham group and bp < 0.05 vs. the corresponding male group.
Echocardiography data and hemodynamic values.
| Parameters | ShM (n = 11) | ShF (n = 7) | ArM (n = 7) | ArF (n = 7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDD, mm | 9.3 ± 0.15 | 7.9 ± 0.08b | 12.1 ± 0.52a | 10.4 ± 0.2a, b |
| ESD, mm | 4.4 ± 0.09 | 3.7 ± 0.08b | 7.0 ± 0.45a | 5.5 ± 0.19a, b |
| SW, mm | 1.5 ± 0.03 | 1.3 ± 0.02b | 1.5 ± 0.03 | 1.4 ± 0.03a, b |
| PW, mm | 1.5 ± 0.03 | 1.4 ± 0.03b | 1.6 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.02a |
| LV mass (echo), mg | 1109 ± 51.2 | 724 ± 13.0b | 1793 ± 148.9a | 1246 ± 85.4a, b |
| Ind. LV mass (echo), mg/g | 1.6 ± 0.08 | 2.1 ± 0.07b | 2.7 ± 0.08a | 3.7 ± 0.28a, b |
| RWT, unitless | 0.33 ± 0.004 | 0.34 ± 0.006 | 0.26 ± 0.012a | 0.28 ± 0.004a |
| mWS, mmHg.cm2 | 189 ± 1.8 | 169 ± 1.8 | 278 ± 15.0a | 231 ± 5.6a, b |
| FS, % | 53 ± 0.5 | 54 ± 0.6 | 42 ± 1.4a | 47 ± 1.0a, b |
| % regurgitation | na | na | 79 ± 4.5 | 79 ± 7.1 |
| LAD, mm | 6.4 ± 0.14 | 4.3 ± 0.12b | 7.9 ± 0.37a | 5.7 ± 0.17a, b |
| MWV, mm/s | 20.9 ± 0.58 | 22.3 ± 0.74 | 18.0 ± 0.91 | 21.2 ± 0.80 |
| MPI (Tei index) | 0.39 ± 0.019 | 0.43 ± 0.018 | 0.52 ± 0.030a | 0.52 ± 0.050a |
| HR, bpm | 365 ± 11.0 | 396 ± 9.0 | 337 ± 12.9a | 380 ± 9.3b |
| SV, µl | 202 ± 3.0 | 160 ± 0.6b | 409 ± 31.0a | 260 ± 4.1a, b |
| CO, ml/min | 74 ± 2.7 | 64 ± 3.2b | 137 ± 10.3a | 98 ± 2.7a, b |
| dP/dT+ | 5470 ± 475 | 6519 ± 465 | 4881 ± 354 | 5679 ± 707 |
| dP/dT− | 5389 ± 375 | 6598 ± 603 | 4526 ± 271 | 3467 ± 295a |
| EDP, mmHg | 13.6 ± 0.68 | 11.3 ± 1.48 | 17.1 ± 1.06a | 13.7 ± 1.60b |
| SAP, mmHg | 125 ± 7.0 | 123 ± 5.0 | 131 ± 6.6 | 128 ± 9.6 |
| DAP, mmHg | 78 ± 3.0 | 75 ± 4.2 | 58 ± 2.9a | 56 ± 5.2a |
| PP, mmHg | 47 ± 5.3 | 48 ± 3.2 | 72 ± 4.8a | 72 ± 5.0a |
EDD: end-diastolic diameter, ESD: end-systolic diameter, SW: septal wall thickness, PW: posterior wall, Ind: indexed, RWT: relative wall thickness, mWS: mean LV wall stress, FS: fractional shortening, LAD, left atrial diameter, MWV: LV mid-wall velocity, MPI: myocardial performance index, HR: heart rate, bpm: beats per minute, SV: stroke volume, CO: cardiac output, dP/dt+ and dP/dt−, maximal and minimal derivative of pressure/time, EDP: LV end-diastolic pressure, SAP: systolic arterial pressure, DAP: diastolic arterial pressure and PP: pulse pressure. Na: not applicable. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of animals per group is indicated in parentheses. ap < 0.05 vs. the corresponding sham group and bp < 0.05 vs. the corresponding male group. Echocardiography measurements were obtained under inhaled isoflurane anaesthesia.
Figure 1Progression of different LV parameters as evaluated by echocardiography during the duration of the study (26 weeks). Δ: % difference between week 0 and week 26, EDD: end-diastolic diameter (A), ESD: end-systolic diameter (B), SW: septal wall thickness (C), PW: posterior wall thickness (D), RWT: relative wall thickness (E), mWS: mean wall stress (F), FS: fractional shortening (G), SV: stroke volume (H) and CO: cardiac output (I). The results are reported in % as the mean ± SEM (n = 7–11/gr). Probability values from a 2-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak post-testing to evaluate the p value of sex, (S), disease (D) or disease-sex interactions (S × D) are shown next to each panel.
Figure 2Impact of LV dilatation and hypertrophy caused by severe aortic regurgitation on cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area (Top panels; A and B) and on myocardial capillary density (bottom panels (C and D). Left panels (A and C): The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–7/gr.). Probability values are from a 2-way ANOVA and Holm-Sedak post-testing. *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 between indicated groups. Upper right panels: Representative Masson’s trichrome staining of mid-chamber short-axis LV sections (magnification x200); bottom right panels: LV sections stained with isolectin B4 coupled with horseradish peroxidase (magnification x400).
Figure 3Evaluation by real-time quantitative RT-PCR of the LV mRNA levels of various hypertrophy (top two graphs; A and B) and extracellular matrix remodelling (bottom; C) markers. The results are reported in arbitrary units (AU) as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/gr.). The mRNA levels of the sham (sham-operated animals) groups (ShM and ShF) were normalized to 1 and are represented by the dotted line. White columns represent the ArM group, and black columns represent the ArF group. *p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding sham group and ¶p < 0.05 between the ArM and ArF groups.
Figure 4LV myocardial activity levels of enzymes implicated in fatty acid β-oxidation, glucose metabolism and mitochondrial energy production in male and female AR rats after 6 months. Hydroxyacyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH) (A), hexokinase (HK) (B), citrate synthase (C), and succinate dehydrogenase (D) enzymatic activities were measured in LV homogenates from 5–6 animals in each group as described in the Methods. The results are reported as the mean ± SEM. Probability values are from a 2-way ANOVA and Holm-Sedak post-testing. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 between indicated groups.
Figure 5Evaluation by real-time quantitative RT-PCR of the LV mRNA levels of genes encoding for enzymes implicated in fatty acid oxidation (left panels; A and C) and glycolysis (top right panel; B) and for transcription factors related to bioenergetics control (right bottom panel; D). The results are reported in arbitrary units (AU) as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/gr.). The mRNA levels of the sham (sham-operated animals) groups (ShM and ShF) were normalized to 1 and are represented by the dotted line. White columns represent the ArM group, and black columns represent the ArF group. *p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding sham group and ¶p < 0.05 between the ArM and ArF groups.
Figure 6Evaluation by real-time quantitative RT-PCR of the LV mRNA levels of genes encoding for markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and function (A and B). The results are reported in arbitrary units (AU) as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/gr.). The mRNA levels of the sham (sham-operated animals) groups (ShM and ShF) were normalized to 1 and are represented by the dotted line. White columns represent the ArM group, and black columns represent the ArF group. *p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding sham group and ¶p < 0.05 between the ArM and ArF groups.