Literature DB >> 28389323

An approach to allergy risk assessments for e-liquid ingredients.

Sandra Costigan1, Juan Lopez-Belmonte2.   

Abstract

Many flavours and fragrances are known allergens. Their selection and inclusion levels in e-liquids must therefore be guided by toxicological principles, taking into account the exposure pattern and inhalation route of exposure. For contact sensitisation, a general, agreed quantitative risk assessment approach to prevent dermal sensitisation exists. Here we propose exposure parameters and safety factors to apply this approach to e-liquid ingredients. Additionally, as a risk management approach for pre-sensitised individuals, we derive a threshold of 0.1% for indicating the presence of a contact sensitiser in e-liquid. Risk assessment for respiratory sensitisation is not well established. Occupational exposure limits that protect against respiratory allergy are generally very low. Cocoa shell extract is used as a case study to discuss the issues. A tolerable exposure level is derived and estimates of consumer exposure are presented, leading to the practical risk management approach of excluding respiratory sensitisers as e-liquid ingredients. Related to this, if natural extracts are used as flavourings in e-liquids, we recommend only protein-free versions are used. Additionally, we recommend the presence of any potential food allergens should be noted on the product information.
Copyright © 2017 British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact sensitisation; E-cigarette; E-liquid; ENDS; Flavour; Hypersensitivity; Respiratory allergy; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389323     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  2 in total

1.  Association of smoking and electronic cigarette use with wheezing and related respiratory symptoms in adults: cross-sectional results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, wave 2.

Authors:  Dongmei Li; Isaac K Sundar; Scott McIntosh; Deborah J Ossip; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Richard J O'Connor; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The Evolving E-cigarette: Comparative Chemical Analyses of E-cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke.

Authors:  Anthony Cunningham; Kevin McAdam; Jesse Thissen; Helena Digard
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.