Roy J Weinberg1, Tamuru Okada2, Aaron Chen1, Walter Kim3, Changyi Chen1, Peter H Lin4. 1. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Vascular Associates, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Vascular Associates, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: plin@bcm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy device has become an important therapeutic armamentarium in the management of venous thromboembolism. In this study, we compare the efficacy and safety profile of the AngioJet thrombectomy device and ASPIRE thrombectomy system in a porcine venous thrombosis model. METHODS: Twelve adult pigs underwent bilateral iliac venous thrombosis created by using a stent graft thrombosis model and subsequently underwent either AngioJet (n = 6) or ASPIRE mechanical thrombectomy (n = 6) 1 week later. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to assess thrombectomy efficacy, and computed tomography was used to evaluate pulmonary embolism (PE). Hemolytic effect was measured by plasma-free hemoglobin (PfHgb). Iliac vein thrombogenicity was evaluated with radiolabeled platelet and fibrin deposition. Veins were harvested and evaluated with light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Similar thrombectomy efficacy by IVUS evaluation was noted in both groups. Significant greater PE and hemolysis were identified in the AngioJet group compared to the ASPIRE group. The AngioJet group had greater reduction in WBC and platelet compared to the ASPIRE group. No difference was found in thrombogenicity, light microscopic evaluation, or SEM. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices had similar thrombectomy efficacy and thrombogenicity response. The ASPIRE catheter incurred less PE and hemolysis compared to the AngioJet device. Vessel wall response by histological analysis and SEM was similar in both groups.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy device has become an important therapeutic armamentarium in the management of venous thromboembolism. In this study, we compare the efficacy and safety profile of the AngioJet thrombectomy device and ASPIRE thrombectomy system in a porcine venous thrombosis model. METHODS: Twelve adult pigs underwent bilateral iliac venous thrombosis created by using a stent graft thrombosis model and subsequently underwent either AngioJet (n = 6) or ASPIRE mechanical thrombectomy (n = 6) 1 week later. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to assess thrombectomy efficacy, and computed tomography was used to evaluate pulmonary embolism (PE). Hemolytic effect was measured by plasma-free hemoglobin (PfHgb). Iliac vein thrombogenicity was evaluated with radiolabeled platelet and fibrin deposition. Veins were harvested and evaluated with light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Similar thrombectomy efficacy by IVUS evaluation was noted in both groups. Significant greater PE and hemolysis were identified in the AngioJet group compared to the ASPIRE group. The AngioJet group had greater reduction in WBC and platelet compared to the ASPIRE group. No difference was found in thrombogenicity, light microscopic evaluation, or SEM. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices had similar thrombectomy efficacy and thrombogenicity response. The ASPIRE catheter incurred less PE and hemolysis compared to the AngioJet device. Vessel wall response by histological analysis and SEM was similar in both groups.