Literature DB >> 28388844

Effects of Drug-Antibody Ratio on Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Antibody-Maytansinoid Conjugates.

Xiuxia Sun1, Jose F Ponte1, Nicholas C Yoder1, Rassol Laleau1, Jennifer Coccia1, Leanne Lanieri1, Qifeng Qiu1, Rui Wu1, Erica Hong1, Megan Bogalhas1, Lintao Wang1, Ling Dong1, Yulius Setiady1, Erin K Maloney1, Olga Ab1, Xiaoyan Zhang1, Jan Pinkas1, Thomas A Keating1, Ravi Chari1, Hans K Erickson1, John M Lambert1.   

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are being actively pursued as a treatment option for cancer following the regulatory approval of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla). ADCs consist of a cytotoxic agent conjugated to a targeting antibody through a linker. The two approved ADCs (and most ADCs now in the clinic that use a microtubule disrupting agent as the payload) are heterogeneous conjugates with an average drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 3-4 (potentially ranging from 0 to 8 for individual species). Ado-trastuzumab emtansine employs DM1, a semisynthetic cytotoxic payload of the maytansinoid class, which is conjugated via lysine residues of the antibody to an average DAR of 3.5. To understand the effect of DAR on the preclinical properties of ADCs using maytansinoid cytotoxic agents, we prepared a series of conjugates with a cleavable linker (M9346A-sulfo-SPDB-DM4 targeting folate receptor α (FRα)) or an uncleavable linker (J2898A-SMCC-DM1 targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)) with varying DAR and evaluated their biochemical characteristics, in vivo stability, efficacy, and tolerability. For both formats, a series of ADCs with DARs ranging from low (average of ∼2 and range of 0-4) to very high (average of 10 and range of 7-14) were prepared in good yield with high monomer content and low levels of free cytotoxic agent. The in vitro potency consistently increased with increasing DAR at a constant antibody concentration. We then characterized the in vivo disposition of these ADCs. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that conjugates with an average DAR below ∼6 had comparable clearance rates, but for those with an average DAR of ∼9-10, rapid clearance was observed. Biodistribution studies in mice showed that these 9-10 DAR ADCs rapidly accumulate in the liver, with maximum localization for this organ at 24-28% percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) compared with 7-10% for lower-DAR conjugates (all at 2-6 h post-injection). Our preclinical findings on tolerability and efficacy suggest that maytansinoid conjugates with DAR ranging from 2 to 6 have a better therapeutic index than conjugates with very high DAR (∼9-10). These very high DAR ADCs suffer from decreased efficacy, likely due to faster clearance. These results support the use of DAR 3-4 for maytansinoid ADCs but suggest that the exploration of lower or higher DAR may be warranted depending on the biology of the target antigen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28388844     DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   4.774


  37 in total

1.  Lipophilic indocarbocyanine conjugates for efficient incorporation of enzymes, antibodies and small molecules into biological membranes.

Authors:  Weston J Smith; Huy Tran; James I Griffin; Jessica Jones; Vivian P Vu; Lizanne Nilewski; Nathan Gianneschi; Dmitri Simberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Antibody-Drug Conjugates against Cancer.

Authors:  Paul Malik; Colin Phipps; Andrea Edginton; Jonathan Blay
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Understanding the in vivo fate of radioimmunoconjugates for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Delphine Vivier; Sai Kiran Sharma; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.921

4.  Preclinical and translational pharmacokinetics of a novel THIOMAB™ antibody-antibiotic conjugate against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Rong Deng; Chenguang Zhou; Dongwei Li; Hao Cai; Siddharth Sukumaran; Montserrat Carrasco-Triguero; Ola Saad; Denise Nazzal; Christopher Lowe; Saroja Ramanujan; Amrita V Kamath
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  The clinical development of antibody-drug conjugates - lessons from leukaemia.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Shilpa Paul; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Improved Tumor Penetration and Single-Cell Targeting of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Increases Anticancer Efficacy and Host Survival.

Authors:  Cornelius Cilliers; Bruna Menezes; Ian Nessler; Jennifer Linderman; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Reduction-rebridging strategy for the preparation of ADPN-based antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Oleksandr Koniev; Igor Dovgan; Brigitte Renoux; Anthony Ehkirch; Jitka Eberova; Sarah Cianférani; Sergii Kolodych; Sébastien Papot; Alain Wagner
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.597

8.  Rapid and Simultaneous Characterization of Drug Conjugation in Heavy and Light Chains of a Monoclonal Antibody Revealed by High-Resolution Ion Mobility Separations in SLIM.

Authors:  Gabe Nagy; Isaac K Attah; Christopher R Conant; Weijing Liu; Sandilya V B Garimella; Harsha P Gunawardena; Jared B Shaw; Richard D Smith; Yehia M Ibrahim
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Progress in Gynecologic Cancers with Antibody Drug Conjugates.

Authors:  David M O'Malley; Corinne A Calo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Clinical Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Authors:  Iftekhar Mahmood
Journal:  Antibodies (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.