| Literature DB >> 28388561 |
Lutao Du1, Xiumei Jiang1, Weili Duan1, Rui Wang1, Lishui Wang1, Guixi Zheng1, Keqiang Yan2, Lili Wang1, Juan Li1, Xin Zhang1, Hongwei Pan1, Yongmei Yang1, Chuanxin Wang3.
Abstract
Urinary microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC). In this study, we aimed to develop a urinary miRNAs panel for diagnosing and predicting recurrence of BC. Genome-wide miRNAs analysis by deep sequencing followed by two phases of quantitative real-time PCR assays were performed on urine supernatant of 276 BC patients and 276 controls. We identified a seven-miRNA panel (miR-7-5p, miR-22-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-126-5p, miR-200a-3p, miR-375, and miR-423-5p) that provided high diagnostic accuracy of BC with an AUC of 0.923 and 0.916 in training and validation set, respectively. The corresponding AUCs of this panel for Ta, T1 and T2-T4 were 0.864, 0.930 and 0.978, significantly higher than those of urine cytology, which were 0.531, 0.628 and 0.724, respectively (all p < 0.05). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that nonmuscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) patients with high miR-22-3p and low miR-200a-3p level had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.002 and 0.040, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that miR-22-3p and miR-200a-3p were independently associated with RFS of NMIBC (p = 0.024 and 0.008, respectively). In conclusion, our results suggested that urinary miRNAs may have considerable clinical value in diagnosis and recurrence prediction of BC.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; diagnosis; microRNA; recurrence; urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28388561 PMCID: PMC5522322 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
The relative expression of selected urinary miRNA in patients with BC and controls in training set and validation set [median (interquartile range)]
| miRNA | Training set | Validation set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls (n=150) | BCs (n=150) | Controls (n=120) | BCs (n=120) | |||
| miR-22-3p | 1.14 (0.54-1.88) | 2.91 (1.83-4.05) | <0.001 | 1.01 (0.53-1.97) | 2.76 (1.65-3.98) | <0.001 |
| miR-29a-3p | 1.34 (0.54-2.71) | 2.60 (1.18-6.53) | <0.001 | 1.14 (0.50-2.11) | 1.76 (0.77-4.17) | <0.001 |
| miR-375 | 1.10 (0.73-1.71) | 2.07 (1.24-3.73) | <0.001 | 1.03 (0.70-1.51) | 1.83 (1.18-2.61) | <0.001 |
| miR-7-5p | 0.92 (0.49-2.21) | 1.43 (0.86-2.73) | <0.001 | 1.00 (0.56-1.80) | 1.44 (0.80-2.81) | <0.001 |
| miR-126-5p | 1.29 (0.47-1.86) | 3.12 (1.01-5.20) | <0.001 | 1.12 (0.68-1.62) | 2.37 (1.00-4.26) | <0.001 |
| miR-423-5p | 1.04 (0.52-1.94) | 0.47 (0.20-0.93) | <0.001 | 1.01 (0.53-1.75) | 0.54 (0.23-1.20) | <0.001 |
| miR-200a-3p | 1.07 (0.54-1.82) | 0.62 (0.34-0.91) | <0.001 | 0.94 (0.54-1.87) | 0.62 (0.31-1.05) | <0.001 |
Figure 1Relative expression of seven selected miRNAs in urine
Relative expressions of seven selected urinary miRNAs in patients with BC (n = 150) and control individuals (n = 150) using RT-qPCR assay in training set (A–G), *p< 0.001.
Figure 2Diagnostic performance of three-lncRNA panel and urine cytology for the detection of BC
(A and B) ROC curves for the detection of BC using seven-miRNA panel in training set (A) and validation set (B); (C–E) ROC curves using the seven-miRNA panel for the detection of Ta (C), T1 (D) and T2-T4 (E) in validation set; (F–I) ROC curves analysis using urine cytology for the detection of BC with all stages (F), Ta (G), T1 (H) and T2-T4 (I) in validation set.
Correlations between urinary miRNA concentrations and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with BC in validation set [median (interquartile range)]
| Parameters | Total cases | miR-22-3p | miR-29a-3p | miR-375 | miR-7-5p | miR-126-5p | miR-423-5p | miR-200a-3p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | 0.92 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.11 | |||||||||
| <65 | 57 | 2.70 (1.80-3.82) | 1.83 (1.08-4.28) | 1.88 (1.38-2.69) | 1.52 (0.95-2.79) | 3.01 (1.40-4.05) | 0.52 (0.29-0.90) | 0.73 (0.35-1.06) | |||||||
| ≥65 | 63 | 3.06 (1.94-4.70) | 2.20 (0.76-5.00) | 1.69 (1.04-2.47) | 1.26 (0.67-3.10) | 2.03 (0.88-4.70) | 0.35 (0.15-0.89) | 0.50 (0.26-1.01) | |||||||
| 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.82 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.17 | |||||||||
| Male | 94 | 3.06 (1.84-4.29) | 1.92 (0.96-4.11) | 1.77 (1.17-2.63) | 1.37 (0.69-2.75) | 2.10 (0.90-3.90) | 0.42 (0.17-0.94) | 0.54 (0.29-0.94) | |||||||
| Female | 26 | 2.58 (1.75-3.63) | 3.48 (0.99-5.61) | 1.90 (1.28-2.54) | 1.71 (1.07-2.98) | 3.36 (1.50-4.86) | 0.53 (0.37-0.84) | 0.72 (0.46-1.14) | |||||||
| 0.02 | 0.54 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.73 | |||||||||
| Ta-T1 | 71 | 2.59 (1.46-4.01) | 2.02 (0.76-4.18) | 1.52 (1.06-2.56) | 1.27 (0.77-3.10) | 1.74 (0.88-4.23) | 0.52 (0.23-1.15) | 0.59 (0.29-1.05) | |||||||
| T2-T4 | 49 | 3.21 (2.20-4.74) | 2.35 (1.10-4.58) | 2.16 (1.39-3.03) | 1.52 (1.00-2.79) | 3.20 (1.40-4.31) | 0.40 (0.14-0.71) | 0.65 (0.35-1.05) | |||||||
| 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.17 | |||||||||
| Low grade | 46 | 3.18 (2.00-4.68) | 1.98 (0.73-5.11) | 1.61 (0.56-2.59) | 1.09 (0.65-2.21) | 1.53 (0.82-3.92) | 0.41 (0.16-0.82) | 0.54 (0.26-0.94) | |||||||
| High grade | 74 | 2.71 (1.61-3.84) | 2.16 (1.14-4.27) | 1.88 (1.33-2.67) | 1.61 (1.01-3.09) | 3.02 (1.45-4.29) | 0.47 (0.24-0.93) | 0.69 (0.36-1.06) | |||||||
| 0.80 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.61 | |||||||||
| Negative | 104 | 3.01 (1.83-4.06) | 1.81 (0.83-3.99) | 1.68 (1.14-2.56) | 1.47 (0.79-2.81) | 2.37 (1.00-4.30) | 0.44 (0.18-0.92) | 0.60 (0.34-1.05) | |||||||
| Positive | 16 | 2.47 (1.69-4.33) | 4.21 (1.20-9.88) | 2.44 (1.30-4.19) | 1.39 (0.90-2.87) | 2.58 (0.84-4.19) | 0.40 (0.23-0.81) | 0.65 (0.26-1.04) |
Figure 3Prognostic significance of miR-22-3p and miR-200a-3p expression
Kaplan–Meier curves for recurrence-free survival according to the urine levels of miR-22-3p (A) and miR-200a-3p (B) in NMIBC patients in validation set.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis of recurrence-free survival in NMIBC patients in validation set
| Parameters | Categories | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | Parameters | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| age | <65 vs. ≥65 | 0.816 (0.408-1.632) | 0.565 | |||
| sex | Male vs. Female | 1.220 (0.548-2.717) | 0.626 | |||
| Tumor stage | Ta vs. T1 | 2.852 (1.346-6.043) | 0.006 | Tumor stage | 2.956 (1.324-6.602) | 0.008 |
| Tumor grade | Low vs. High | 0.712 (0.450-1.126) | 0.147 | |||
| Lymph node metastasis | Negative vs. Positive | 0.541 (0.074-3.966) | 0.546 | |||
| miR-22-3p expression | Low vs. High | 3.040 (1.435-6.443) | 0.004 | miR-22-3p expression | 2.469 (1.128-5.406) | 0.024 |
| miR-29a-3p expression | Low vs. High | 1.206 (0.599-2.425) | 0.600 | |||
| miR-375 expression | Low vs. High | 0.969 (0.484-1.943) | 0.930 | |||
| miR-7-5p expression | Low vs. High | 0.677 (0.337-1.363) | 0.275 | |||
| miR-126-5p expression | Low vs. High | 0.725 (0.362-1.452) | 0.365 | |||
| miR-423-5p expression | Low vs. High | 0.715 (0.355-1.438) | 0.346 | |||
| miR-200a-3p expression | Low vs. High | 0.481 (0.234-0.985) | 0.045 | miR-200a-3p expression | 0.364 (0.173-0.766) | 0.008 |
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.