Steven M Kogan1, Junhan Cho2, Gene H Brody3, Steven R H Beach4. 1. Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, 123 Dawson Hall, 305 Sanford Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Center for Family Research, University of Georgia, 1095 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4527, USA. Electronic address: smkogan@uga.edu. 2. Center for Family Research, University of Georgia, 1095 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4527, USA. Electronic address: junhan.cho@usc.edu. 3. Center for Family Research, University of Georgia, 1095 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4527, USA. Electronic address: gbrody@uga.edu. 4. Center for Family Research, University of Georgia, 1095 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4527, USA. Electronic address: srhbeach@uga.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Marijuana use rates peak during emerging adulthood (ages 18 to 25years). Although marijuana use quantity reliably predicts substance-related problems, considerable individual differences characterize this association. The aims of the present study were to examine the influence of community disadvantage in amplifying the effects of marijuana use on downstream substance use problems, as well as the mediating influence of social disengagement in the path linking marijuana use frequency to related problems. METHOD: We conducted a 3-year longitudinal study with 505 Black men from rural communities in Georgia, age 20.3years at baseline. Three waves of data were collected at 18-month intervals in participants' homes or convenient community settings. Men completed audio computer-assisted self-interviews concerning their substance use, engagement in conventional roles and relationships, community characteristics, and substance use problems. RESULTS: Community disadvantage moderated the association of marijuana use with changes in substance use problems across time. In disadvantaged communities, a robust effect emerged between marijuana use frequency and related problems, whereas in less disadvantaged communities, marijuana use quantity and problems were not significantly associated. Increases in social disengagement mediated the influence of marijuana use on substance use problems in the context of community disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: For young Black men, residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood appears to amplify the impact of marijuana use on substance use problems. This effect appears to be a consequence of increases in social disengagement.
OBJECTIVES:Marijuana use rates peak during emerging adulthood (ages 18 to 25years). Although marijuana use quantity reliably predicts substance-related problems, considerable individual differences characterize this association. The aims of the present study were to examine the influence of community disadvantage in amplifying the effects of marijuana use on downstream substance use problems, as well as the mediating influence of social disengagement in the path linking marijuana use frequency to related problems. METHOD: We conducted a 3-year longitudinal study with 505 Black men from rural communities in Georgia, age 20.3years at baseline. Three waves of data were collected at 18-month intervals in participants' homes or convenient community settings. Men completed audio computer-assisted self-interviews concerning their substance use, engagement in conventional roles and relationships, community characteristics, and substance use problems. RESULTS: Community disadvantage moderated the association of marijuana use with changes in substance use problems across time. In disadvantaged communities, a robust effect emerged between marijuana use frequency and related problems, whereas in less disadvantaged communities, marijuana use quantity and problems were not significantly associated. Increases in social disengagement mediated the influence of marijuana use on substance use problems in the context of community disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: For young Black men, residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood appears to amplify the impact of marijuana use on substance use problems. This effect appears to be a consequence of increases in social disengagement.
Authors: Brett C Haberstick; Susan E Young; Joanna S Zeiger; Jeffrey M Lessem; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Beth A Reboussin; Renee M Johnson; Kerry M Green; C Debra M Furr-Holden; Nicholas S Ialongo; Adam J Milam Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Steven M Kogan; Junhan Cho; Steven R H Beach; Alicia K Smith; Shota Nishitani Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 4.492